Greetings, This is more of just a report than anything else. I run linux-stable, and while btrfs in 3.11.7 seemed fine, I''ve had oopses ever since installating 3.11.8. The server is not under heavy load when it happens, and it happens fairly shortly after a clean boot. The oopses all look like the following; here''s a representative couple. INFO: task btrfs-transacti:2103 blocked for more than 120 seconds. btrfs-transacti D c1089143 0 2103 2 0x00000000 d2391e80 00000046 d2391e60 c1089143 00000002 f74a1980 c198a100 9204095a 000002b7 c198a100 f7bd7100 efbfa640 f74a1980 d2391e58 c10113a7 f7bd7148 00000000 00000002 efbfa960 d2391e60 c107a391 00000000 d1009a80 d1009bd0 Call Trace: [<c1089143>] ? idle_balance+0x2a3/0x3b0 [<c10113a7>] ? __switch_to+0xc7/0x340 [<c107a391>] ? finish_task_switch+0x41/0xc0 [<c114c616>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xe6/0x100 [<f865d050>] ? btrfs_free_path+0x20/0x30 [btrfs] [<c15e7e13>] schedule+0x23/0x60 [<c15e64b5>] schedule_timeout+0x1d5/0x240 [<c15e8b1d>] ? _raw_spin_lock+0xd/0x10 [<f869dc40>] ? btrfs_run_ordered_operations+0x270/0x2b0 [btrfs] [<c103e628>] ? default_spin_lock_flags+0x8/0x10 [<c15e8cbf>] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2f/0x50 [<c106d418>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x48/0x70 [<f868418c>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x34c/0xa50 [btrfs] [<f8684cc4>] ? start_transaction+0x84/0x4a0 [btrfs] [<c105aaa0>] ? cascade+0x130/0x130 [<c106d1b0>] ? wake_up_bit+0x30/0x30 [<f867d0d9>] transaction_kthread+0x169/0x1f0 [btrfs] [<f867cf70>] ? btrfs_destroy_marked_extents.clone.96.clone.119+0x1e0/0x1e0 [btrfs] [<c106ca0c>] kthread+0x9c/0xa0 [<c1070000>] ? run_posix_cpu_timers+0x360/0x820 [<c15efef7>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28 [<c106c970>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0 INFO: task btrfs-transacti:2103 blocked for more than 120 seconds. btrfs-transacti D c1089143 0 2103 2 0x00000000 d2391e80 00000046 d2391e60 c1089143 00000002 f74a1980 c198a100 9204095a 000002b7 c198a100 f7bd7100 efbfa640 f74a1980 d2391e58 c10113a7 f7bd7148 00000000 00000002 efbfa960 d2391e60 c107a391 00000000 d1009a80 d1009bd0 Call Trace: [<c1089143>] ? idle_balance+0x2a3/0x3b0 [<c10113a7>] ? __switch_to+0xc7/0x340 [<c107a391>] ? finish_task_switch+0x41/0xc0 [<c114c616>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xe6/0x100 [<f865d050>] ? btrfs_free_path+0x20/0x30 [btrfs] [<c15e7e13>] schedule+0x23/0x60 [<c15e64b5>] schedule_timeout+0x1d5/0x240 [<c15e8b1d>] ? _raw_spin_lock+0xd/0x10 [<f869dc40>] ? btrfs_run_ordered_operations+0x270/0x2b0 [btrfs] [<c103e628>] ? default_spin_lock_flags+0x8/0x10 [<c15e8cbf>] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2f/0x50 [<c106d418>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x48/0x70 [<f868418c>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x34c/0xa50 [btrfs] [<f8684cc4>] ? start_transaction+0x84/0x4a0 [btrfs] [<c105aaa0>] ? cascade+0x130/0x130 [<c106d1b0>] ? wake_up_bit+0x30/0x30 [<f867d0d9>] transaction_kthread+0x169/0x1f0 [btrfs] [<f867cf70>] ? btrfs_destroy_marked_extents.clone.96.clone.119+0x1e0/0x1e0 [btrfs] [<c106ca0c>] kthread+0x9c/0xa0 [<c1070000>] ? run_posix_cpu_timers+0x360/0x820 [<c15efef7>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28 [<c106c970>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0 This is on x86_64, server-class hardware (ECC memory, etc). I ran a scrub overnight that reported no errors, and I''ll do it again now that I''ve reverted to 3.11.7. Is there any other info that might be useful to the btrfs devs about this? Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon GPL''ed software available at: http://pyropus.ca/software/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Nov 18, 2013, at 8:00 PM, Charles Cazabon <charlesc-lists-btrfs@pyropus.ca> wrote:> > This is on x86_64, server-class hardware (ECC memory, etc). I ran a scrub > overnight that reported no errors, and I''ll do it again now that I''ve reverted > to 3.11.7. > > Is there any other info that might be useful to the btrfs devs about this?sysrq+w would dump the blockage to kernel messages. Depending on your kernel you may need to first enable sysrq functions with echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq then echo 2 > /proc/sysrq-trigger then dmesg Chris Murphy-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Nov 18, 2013, at 8:53 PM, Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> wrote:> > On Nov 18, 2013, at 8:00 PM, Charles Cazabon <charlesc-lists-btrfs@pyropus.ca> wrote: >> >> This is on x86_64, server-class hardware (ECC memory, etc). I ran a scrub >> overnight that reported no errors, and I''ll do it again now that I''ve reverted >> to 3.11.7. >> >> Is there any other info that might be useful to the btrfs devs about this? > > sysrq+w would dump the blockage to kernel messages. Depending on your kernel you may need to first enable sysrq functions with > > echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq > > then > > echo 2 > /proc/sysrq-triggerCute. That 2 is supposed to be a w, hence sysrq+w. Chris Murphy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html