Filipe David Borba Manana
2013-Sep-22 20:54 UTC
[PATCH] Btrfs: fix tracking of orphan inode count
In inode.c:btrfs_orphan_add() if we failed to insert the orphan
item, we would return without decrementing the orphan count that
we just incremented before attempting the insertion, leaving the
orphan inode count wrong.
In inode.c:btrfs_orphan_del(), we were decrementing the inode
orphan count if the bit BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED was set,
which is logically wrong because it should be decremented if the
bit BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM was set - after all we increment
the count when we set the bit BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 40a32ed..c462bd1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -2969,6 +2969,7 @@ int btrfs_orphan_add(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct inode *inode)
if (insert >= 1) {
ret = btrfs_insert_orphan_item(trans, root, btrfs_ino(inode));
if (ret) {
+ atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
if (reserve) {
clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED,
&BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags);
@@ -3018,14 +3019,16 @@ static int btrfs_orphan_del(struct btrfs_trans_handle
*trans,
release_rsv = 1;
spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock);
- if (trans && delete_item)
- ret = btrfs_del_orphan_item(trans, root, btrfs_ino(inode));
-
- if (release_rsv) {
- btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode);
+ if (delete_item) {
atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
+ if (trans)
+ ret = btrfs_del_orphan_item(trans, root,
+ btrfs_ino(inode));
}
+ if (release_rsv)
+ btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode);
+
return ret;
}
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html