Qu Wenruo
2013-Jun-26 05:27 UTC
[PATCH] btrfs-progs: Cleanup for using BTRFS_SETGET_STACK instead of raw convert
Some codes still use the cpu_to_lexx instead of the
BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS declared in ctree.h.
Also added some BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS for btrfs_header and
btrfs_super.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
btrfs-convert.c | 2 +-
btrfs-find-root.c | 6 +++---
btrfs-image.c | 2 +-
btrfs-show-super.c | 2 +-
ctree.h | 7 +++++++
disk-io.c | 6 +++---
utils.c | 4 ++--
volumes.c | 2 +-
8 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/btrfs-convert.c b/btrfs-convert.c
index 399856f..cb96790 100644
--- a/btrfs-convert.c
+++ b/btrfs-convert.c
@@ -1802,7 +1802,7 @@ static int prepare_system_chunk_sb(struct
btrfs_super_block *super)
btrfs_set_stack_chunk_num_stripes(chunk, 1);
btrfs_set_stack_chunk_sub_stripes(chunk, 0);
chunk->stripe.devid = super->dev_item.devid;
- chunk->stripe.offset = cpu_to_le64(0);
+ btrfs_set_stack_stripe_offset(&chunk->stripe, 0);
memcpy(chunk->stripe.dev_uuid, super->dev_item.uuid, BTRFS_UUID_SIZE);
btrfs_set_super_sys_array_size(super, sizeof(*key) + sizeof(*chunk));
return 0;
diff --git a/btrfs-find-root.c b/btrfs-find-root.c
index 810d835..d3f4ccc 100644
--- a/btrfs-find-root.c
+++ b/btrfs-find-root.c
@@ -247,10 +247,10 @@ static int search_iobuf(struct btrfs_root *root, void
*iobuf,
u64 h_byte, h_level, h_gen, h_owner;
// printf("searching %Lu\n", offset + block_off);
- h_byte = le64_to_cpu(header->bytenr);
- h_owner = le64_to_cpu(header->owner);
+ h_byte = btrfs_stack_header_bytenr(header);
+ h_owner = btrfs_stack_header_owner(header);
h_level = header->level;
- h_gen = le64_to_cpu(header->generation);
+ h_gen = btrfs_stack_header_generation(header);
if (h_owner != objectid)
goto next;
diff --git a/btrfs-image.c b/btrfs-image.c
index 22239fe..599a35f 100644
--- a/btrfs-image.c
+++ b/btrfs-image.c
@@ -1332,7 +1332,7 @@ static void update_super_old(u8 *buffer)
btrfs_set_stack_chunk_num_stripes(chunk, 1);
btrfs_set_stack_chunk_sub_stripes(chunk, 0);
chunk->stripe.devid = super->dev_item.devid;
- chunk->stripe.offset = cpu_to_le64(0);
+ btrfs_set_stack_stripe_offset(&chunk->stripe, 0);
memcpy(chunk->stripe.dev_uuid, super->dev_item.uuid, BTRFS_UUID_SIZE);
btrfs_set_super_sys_array_size(super, sizeof(*key) + sizeof(*chunk));
csum_block(buffer, 4096);
diff --git a/btrfs-show-super.c b/btrfs-show-super.c
index f587f10..3e2567e 100644
--- a/btrfs-show-super.c
+++ b/btrfs-show-super.c
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static void dump_superblock(struct btrfs_super_block *sb)
s = (char *) &sb->magic;
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
putchar(isprint(s[i]) ? s[i] : ''.'');
- if (sb->magic == cpu_to_le64(BTRFS_MAGIC))
+ if (btrfs_super_magic(sb) == BTRFS_MAGIC)
printf(" [match]\n");
else
printf(" [DON''T MATCH]\n");
diff --git a/ctree.h b/ctree.h
index 3fe14b0..4c2f430 100644
--- a/ctree.h
+++ b/ctree.h
@@ -1712,6 +1712,12 @@ BTRFS_SETGET_HEADER_FUNCS(header_owner, struct
btrfs_header, owner, 64);
BTRFS_SETGET_HEADER_FUNCS(header_nritems, struct btrfs_header, nritems, 32);
BTRFS_SETGET_HEADER_FUNCS(header_flags, struct btrfs_header, flags, 64);
BTRFS_SETGET_HEADER_FUNCS(header_level, struct btrfs_header, level, 8);
+BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(stack_header_bytenr, struct btrfs_header, bytenr, 64);
+BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(stack_header_nritems, struct btrfs_header, nritems,
+ 32);
+BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(stack_header_owner, struct btrfs_header, owner, 64);
+BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(stack_header_generation, struct btrfs_header,
+ generation, 64);
static inline int btrfs_header_flag(struct extent_buffer *eb, u64 flag)
{
@@ -1918,6 +1924,7 @@ BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(super_csum_type, struct
btrfs_super_block,
csum_type, 16);
BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(super_cache_generation, struct btrfs_super_block,
cache_generation, 64);
+BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(super_magic, struct btrfs_super_block, magic, 64);
static inline int btrfs_super_csum_size(struct btrfs_super_block *s)
{
diff --git a/disk-io.c b/disk-io.c
index 9ffe6e4..4eef029 100644
--- a/disk-io.c
+++ b/disk-io.c
@@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block
*sb, u64 sb_bytenr)
return -1;
if (btrfs_super_bytenr(&buf) != sb_bytenr ||
- buf.magic != cpu_to_le64(BTRFS_MAGIC))
+ btrfs_super_magic(&buf) != BTRFS_MAGIC)
return -1;
memcpy(sb, &buf, sizeof(*sb));
@@ -1120,9 +1120,9 @@ int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block
*sb, u64 sb_bytenr)
if (btrfs_super_bytenr(&buf) != bytenr )
continue;
/* if magic is NULL, the device was removed */
- if (buf.magic == 0 && i == 0)
+ if (btrfs_super_magic(&buf) == 0 && i == 0)
return -1;
- if (buf.magic != cpu_to_le64(BTRFS_MAGIC))
+ if (btrfs_super_magic(&buf) != BTRFS_MAGIC)
continue;
if (!fsid_is_initialized) {
diff --git a/utils.c b/utils.c
index 7b4cd74..1eeda0f 100644
--- a/utils.c
+++ b/utils.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ int make_btrfs(int fd, const char *device, const char
*label,
btrfs_set_super_bytenr(&super, blocks[0]);
btrfs_set_super_num_devices(&super, 1);
- super.magic = cpu_to_le64(BTRFS_MAGIC);
+ btrfs_set_super_magic(&super, BTRFS_MAGIC);
btrfs_set_super_generation(&super, 1);
btrfs_set_super_root(&super, blocks[1]);
btrfs_set_super_chunk_root(&super, blocks[3]);
@@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ int btrfs_device_already_in_root(struct btrfs_root *root,
int fd,
ret = 0;
disk_super = (struct btrfs_super_block *)buf;
- if (disk_super->magic != cpu_to_le64(BTRFS_MAGIC))
+ if (btrfs_super_magic(disk_super) != BTRFS_MAGIC)
goto brelse;
if (!memcmp(disk_super->fsid, root->fs_info->super_copy->fsid,
diff --git a/volumes.c b/volumes.c
index d6f81f8..05608a5 100644
--- a/volumes.c
+++ b/volumes.c
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(int fd, const char *path,
ret = -EIO;
goto error_brelse;
}
- devid = le64_to_cpu(disk_super->dev_item.devid);
+ devid = btrfs_stack_device_id(&disk_super->dev_item);
if (btrfs_super_flags(disk_super) & BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_METADUMP)
*total_devs = 1;
else
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
David Sterba
2013-Jul-02 17:26 UTC
Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: Cleanup for using BTRFS_SETGET_STACK instead of raw convert
That''s a good cleanup, please send the kernel version as well. david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
David Sterba
2013-Jul-02 17:36 UTC
Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: Cleanup for using BTRFS_SETGET_STACK instead of raw convert
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 01:27:08PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:> --- a/btrfs-convert.c > +++ b/btrfs-convert.c > @@ -1802,7 +1802,7 @@ static int prepare_system_chunk_sb(struct btrfs_super_block *super) > btrfs_set_stack_chunk_num_stripes(chunk, 1); > btrfs_set_stack_chunk_sub_stripes(chunk, 0); > chunk->stripe.devid = super->dev_item.devid;This should use the btrfs_set_* accessors too, right?> - chunk->stripe.offset = cpu_to_le64(0); > + btrfs_set_stack_stripe_offset(&chunk->stripe, 0); > memcpy(chunk->stripe.dev_uuid, super->dev_item.uuid, BTRFS_UUID_SIZE); > btrfs_set_super_sys_array_size(super, sizeof(*key) + sizeof(*chunk)); > return 0;> --- a/btrfs-image.c > +++ b/btrfs-image.c > @@ -1332,7 +1332,7 @@ static void update_super_old(u8 *buffer) > btrfs_set_stack_chunk_num_stripes(chunk, 1); > btrfs_set_stack_chunk_sub_stripes(chunk, 0); > chunk->stripe.devid = super->dev_item.devid;same here, and there''s one more in update_super().> - chunk->stripe.offset = cpu_to_le64(0); > + btrfs_set_stack_stripe_offset(&chunk->stripe, 0); > memcpy(chunk->stripe.dev_uuid, super->dev_item.uuid, BTRFS_UUID_SIZE); > btrfs_set_super_sys_array_size(super, sizeof(*key) + sizeof(*chunk)); > csum_block(buffer, 4096);-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Qu Wenruo
2013-Jul-03 00:43 UTC
Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: Cleanup for using BTRFS_SETGET_STACK instead of raw convert
于 2013年07月03日 01:36, David Sterba 写道:> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 01:27:08PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: >> --- a/btrfs-convert.c >> +++ b/btrfs-convert.c >> @@ -1802,7 +1802,7 @@ static int prepare_system_chunk_sb(struct btrfs_super_block *super) >> btrfs_set_stack_chunk_num_stripes(chunk, 1); >> btrfs_set_stack_chunk_sub_stripes(chunk, 0); >> chunk->stripe.devid = super->dev_item.devid; > This should use the btrfs_set_* accessors too, right?I''m afraid not. :( chunk->stripe.devid is __le64 and so the same is dev_item.devid. btrfs_set_* is calling cpu_to_le64, but neither of them is u64. If using btrfs_set_*, we need to first convert le64 to cpu and then convert back. So here I didn''t use the btrfs_set_* functions.> >> - chunk->stripe.offset = cpu_to_le64(0); >> + btrfs_set_stack_stripe_offset(&chunk->stripe, 0); >> memcpy(chunk->stripe.dev_uuid, super->dev_item.uuid, BTRFS_UUID_SIZE); >> btrfs_set_super_sys_array_size(super, sizeof(*key) + sizeof(*chunk)); >> return 0; >> --- a/btrfs-image.c >> +++ b/btrfs-image.c >> @@ -1332,7 +1332,7 @@ static void update_super_old(u8 *buffer) >> btrfs_set_stack_chunk_num_stripes(chunk, 1); >> btrfs_set_stack_chunk_sub_stripes(chunk, 0); >> chunk->stripe.devid = super->dev_item.devid; > same here, and there''s one more in update_super().Same reason above.> >> - chunk->stripe.offset = cpu_to_le64(0); >> + btrfs_set_stack_stripe_offset(&chunk->stripe, 0); >> memcpy(chunk->stripe.dev_uuid, super->dev_item.uuid, BTRFS_UUID_SIZE); >> btrfs_set_super_sys_array_size(super, sizeof(*key) + sizeof(*chunk)); >> csum_block(buffer, 4096);-- ----------------------------------------------------- Qu Wenruo Development Dept.I Nanjing Fujitsu Nanda Software Tech. Co., Ltd.(FNST) No. 6 Wenzhu Road, Nanjing, 210012, China TEL: +86+25-86630566-8526 COINS: 7998-8526 FAX: +86+25-83317685 MAIL: quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com ----------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Qu Wenruo
2013-Jul-03 00:47 UTC
Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: Cleanup for using BTRFS_SETGET_STACK instead of raw convert
于 2013年07月03日 01:26, David Sterba 写道:> That''s a good cleanup, please send the kernel version as well. > > david >I''ll send the kernel patch asap. -- ----------------------------------------------------- Qu Wenruo Development Dept.I Nanjing Fujitsu Nanda Software Tech. Co., Ltd.(FNST) No. 6 Wenzhu Road, Nanjing, 210012, China TEL: +86+25-86630566-8526 COINS: 7998-8526 FAX: +86+25-83317685 MAIL: quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com ----------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html