So we have lots of places where we try to preallocate chunks in order to
make sure we have enough space as we make our allocations. This has
historically meant that we''re constantly tweaking when we should
allocate a
new chunk, and historically we have gotten this horribly wrong so we way
over allocate either metadata or data. To try and keep this from happening
we are going to make it so that the block group item insertion is done out
of band at the end of a transaction. This will allow us to create chunks
even if we are trying to make an allocation for the extent tree. With this
patch my enospc tests run faster (didn''t expect this) and more
efficiently
use the disk space (this is what I wanted). Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 5 ++
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 10 ++++
fs/btrfs/transaction.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 305002b..d66dc1c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -1137,6 +1137,9 @@ struct btrfs_block_group_cache {
* Today it will only have one thing on it, but that may change
*/
struct list_head cluster_list;
+
+ /* For delayed block group creation */
+ struct list_head new_bg_list;
};
/* delayed seq elem */
@@ -2865,6 +2868,8 @@ int btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle
*trans,
u64 size);
int btrfs_remove_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *root, u64 group_start);
+void btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
+ struct btrfs_root *root);
u64 btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 flags);
u64 btrfs_get_alloc_profile(struct btrfs_root *root, int data);
void btrfs_clear_space_info_full(struct btrfs_fs_info *info);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index a8de1c3..9dc77b2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -2361,10 +2361,6 @@ static noinline int run_clustered_refs(struct
btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
}
next:
- do_chunk_alloc(trans, fs_info->extent_root,
- 2 * 1024 * 1024,
- btrfs_get_alloc_profile(root, 0),
- CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE);
cond_resched();
spin_lock(&delayed_refs->lock);
}
@@ -2478,10 +2474,6 @@ int btrfs_run_delayed_refs(struct btrfs_trans_handle
*trans,
if (root == root->fs_info->extent_root)
root = root->fs_info->tree_root;
- do_chunk_alloc(trans, root->fs_info->extent_root,
- 2 * 1024 * 1024, btrfs_get_alloc_profile(root, 0),
- CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE);
-
btrfs_delayed_refs_qgroup_accounting(trans, root->fs_info);
delayed_refs = &trans->transaction->delayed_refs;
@@ -2551,6 +2543,8 @@ again:
}
if (run_all) {
+ btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(trans, root);
+
node = rb_first(&delayed_refs->root);
if (!node)
goto out;
@@ -3826,7 +3820,8 @@ enum flush_state {
FLUSH_DELALLOC_WAIT = 2,
FLUSH_DELAYED_ITEMS_NR = 3,
FLUSH_DELAYED_ITEMS = 4,
- COMMIT_TRANS = 5,
+ ALLOC_CHUNK = 5,
+ COMMIT_TRANS = 6,
};
static int flush_space(struct btrfs_root *root,
@@ -3863,6 +3858,20 @@ static int flush_space(struct btrfs_root *root,
ret = btrfs_run_delayed_items_nr(trans, root, nr);
btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
break;
+ case ALLOC_CHUNK:
+ trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root);
+ if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(trans);
+ break;
+ }
+ ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root->fs_info->extent_root,
+ num_bytes,
+ btrfs_get_alloc_profile(root, 0),
+ CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE);
+ btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
+ if (ret == -ENOSPC)
+ ret = 0;
+ break;
case COMMIT_TRANS:
ret = may_commit_transaction(root, space_info, orig_bytes, 0);
break;
@@ -5515,8 +5524,6 @@ static noinline int find_free_extent(struct
btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_block_group_cache *used_block_group;
u64 search_start = 0;
int empty_cluster = 2 * 1024 * 1024;
- int allowed_chunk_alloc = 0;
- int done_chunk_alloc = 0;
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
int loop = 0;
int index = 0;
@@ -5548,9 +5555,6 @@ static noinline int find_free_extent(struct
btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
if (btrfs_mixed_space_info(space_info))
use_cluster = false;
- if (orig_root->ref_cows || empty_size)
- allowed_chunk_alloc = 1;
-
if (data & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA && use_cluster) {
last_ptr = &root->fs_info->meta_alloc_cluster;
if (!btrfs_test_opt(root, SSD))
@@ -5860,34 +5864,18 @@ loop:
index = 0;
loop++;
if (loop == LOOP_ALLOC_CHUNK) {
- if (allowed_chunk_alloc) {
- ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root, num_bytes +
- 2 * 1024 * 1024, data,
- CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED);
- /*
- * Do not bail out on ENOSPC since we
- * can do more things.
- */
- if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOSPC) {
- btrfs_abort_transaction(trans,
- root, ret);
- goto out;
- }
- allowed_chunk_alloc = 0;
- if (ret == 1)
- done_chunk_alloc = 1;
- } else if (!done_chunk_alloc &&
- space_info->force_alloc =- CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE) {
- space_info->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED;
+ ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root, num_bytes +
+ 2 * 1024 * 1024, data,
+ CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE);
+ /*
+ * Do not bail out on ENOSPC since we
+ * can do more things.
+ */
+ if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOSPC) {
+ btrfs_abort_transaction(trans,
+ root, ret);
+ goto out;
}
-
- /*
- * We didn''t allocate a chunk, go ahead and drop the
- * empty size and loop again.
- */
- if (!done_chunk_alloc)
- loop = LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE;
}
if (loop == LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE) {
@@ -5962,20 +5950,6 @@ int btrfs_reserve_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle
*trans,
data = btrfs_get_alloc_profile(root, data);
again:
- /*
- * the only place that sets empty_size is btrfs_realloc_node, which
- * is not called recursively on allocations
- */
- if (empty_size || root->ref_cows) {
- ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root->fs_info->extent_root,
- num_bytes + 2 * 1024 * 1024, data,
- CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE);
- if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOSPC) {
- btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, ret);
- return ret;
- }
- }
-
WARN_ON(num_bytes < root->sectorsize);
ret = find_free_extent(trans, root, num_bytes, empty_size,
hint_byte, ins, data);
@@ -5985,12 +5959,6 @@ again:
num_bytes = num_bytes >> 1;
num_bytes = num_bytes & ~(root->sectorsize - 1);
num_bytes = max(num_bytes, min_alloc_size);
- ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root->fs_info->extent_root,
- num_bytes, data, CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE);
- if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOSPC) {
- btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, ret);
- return ret;
- }
if (num_bytes == min_alloc_size)
final_tried = true;
goto again;
@@ -7828,6 +7796,31 @@ error:
return ret;
}
+void btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
+ struct btrfs_root *root)
+{
+ struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group, *tmp;
+ struct btrfs_root *extent_root = root->fs_info->extent_root;
+ struct btrfs_block_group_item item;
+ struct btrfs_key key;
+ int ret;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(block_group, tmp, &trans->new_bgs,
+ new_bg_list) {
+ list_del_init(&block_group->new_bg_list);
+
+ spin_lock(&block_group->lock);
+ memcpy(&item, &block_group->item, sizeof(item));
+ memcpy(&key, &block_group->key, sizeof(key));
+ spin_unlock(&block_group->lock);
+
+ ret = btrfs_insert_item(trans, extent_root, &key, &item,
+ sizeof(item));
+ if (ret)
+ btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, extent_root, ret);
+ }
+}
+
int btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *root, u64 bytes_used,
u64 type, u64 chunk_objectid, u64 chunk_offset,
@@ -7861,6 +7854,7 @@ int btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle
*trans,
spin_lock_init(&cache->lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->cluster_list);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->new_bg_list);
btrfs_init_free_space_ctl(cache);
@@ -7892,12 +7886,7 @@ int btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle
*trans,
ret = btrfs_add_block_group_cache(root->fs_info, cache);
BUG_ON(ret); /* Logic error */
- ret = btrfs_insert_item(trans, extent_root, &cache->key,
&cache->item,
- sizeof(cache->item));
- if (ret) {
- btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, extent_root, ret);
- return ret;
- }
+ list_add_tail(&cache->new_bg_list, &trans->new_bgs);
set_avail_alloc_bits(extent_root->fs_info, type);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
index 0629edf..c01dec7 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
@@ -374,6 +374,7 @@ again:
h->qgroup_reserved = qgroup_reserved;
h->delayed_ref_elem.seq = 0;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&h->qgroup_ref_list);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&h->new_bgs);
smp_mb();
if (cur_trans->blocked && may_wait_transaction(root, type)) {
@@ -549,6 +550,9 @@ static int __btrfs_end_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle
*trans,
trans->qgroup_reserved = 0;
}
+ if (!list_empty(&trans->new_bgs))
+ btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(trans, root);
+
while (count < 2) {
unsigned long cur = trans->delayed_ref_updates;
trans->delayed_ref_updates = 0;
@@ -564,6 +568,9 @@ static int __btrfs_end_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle
*trans,
btrfs_trans_release_metadata(trans, root);
trans->block_rsv = NULL;
+ if (!list_empty(&trans->new_bgs))
+ btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(trans, root);
+
if (lock && !atomic_read(&root->fs_info->open_ioctl_trans)
&&
should_end_transaction(trans, root)) {
trans->transaction->blocked = 1;
@@ -1400,6 +1407,9 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle
*trans,
*/
cur_trans->delayed_refs.flushing = 1;
+ if (!list_empty(&trans->new_bgs))
+ btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(trans, root);
+
ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, root, 0);
if (ret)
goto cleanup_transaction;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.h b/fs/btrfs/transaction.h
index 1b05480..b6463e1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.h
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct btrfs_trans_handle {
struct btrfs_root *root;
struct seq_list delayed_ref_elem;
struct list_head qgroup_ref_list;
+ struct list_head new_bgs;
};
struct btrfs_pending_snapshot {
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 02:04:13PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:> So we have lots of places where we try to preallocate chunks in order to > make sure we have enough space as we make our allocations. This has > historically meant that we''re constantly tweaking when we should allocate a > new chunk, and historically we have gotten this horribly wrong so we way > over allocate either metadata or data. To try and keep this from happening > we are going to make it so that the block group item insertion is done out > of band at the end of a transaction. This will allow us to create chunks > even if we are trying to make an allocation for the extent tree. With this > patch my enospc tests run faster (didn''t expect this) and more efficiently > use the disk space (this is what I wanted). Thanks, >I''m afraid this does not perform good enough in normal case, here is the compilebench test: # cat btrfs-makej/result-4k intial create total runs 30 avg 51.99 MB/s (user 0.50s sys 0.85s) compile total runs 30 avg 98.45 MB/s (user 0.12s sys 0.38s) read compiled tree total runs 3 avg 19.89 MB/s (user 1.55s sys 3.07s) delete compiled tree total runs 30 avg 12.15 seconds (user 0.66s sys 2.15s) # cat btrfs-josef-makej/result intial create total runs 30 avg 49.79 MB/s (user 0.52s sys 0.87s) compile total runs 30 avg 70.01 MB/s (user 0.14s sys 0.44s) read compiled tree total runs 3 avg 18.46 MB/s (user 1.57s sys 3.16s) delete compiled tree total runs 30 avg 13.88 seconds (user 0.67s sys 2.18s) And the blktrace shows that it makes us do more seeks in create and compile section. The patch overall looks clean and good though. thanks, liubo> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 5 ++ > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- > fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 10 ++++ > fs/btrfs/transaction.h | 1 + > 4 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h > index 305002b..d66dc1c 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h > +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h > @@ -1137,6 +1137,9 @@ struct btrfs_block_group_cache { > * Today it will only have one thing on it, but that may change > */ > struct list_head cluster_list; > + > + /* For delayed block group creation */ > + struct list_head new_bg_list; > }; > > /* delayed seq elem */ > @@ -2865,6 +2868,8 @@ int btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > u64 size); > int btrfs_remove_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > struct btrfs_root *root, u64 group_start); > +void btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > + struct btrfs_root *root); > u64 btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 flags); > u64 btrfs_get_alloc_profile(struct btrfs_root *root, int data); > void btrfs_clear_space_info_full(struct btrfs_fs_info *info); > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > index a8de1c3..9dc77b2 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > @@ -2361,10 +2361,6 @@ static noinline int run_clustered_refs(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > } > > next: > - do_chunk_alloc(trans, fs_info->extent_root, > - 2 * 1024 * 1024, > - btrfs_get_alloc_profile(root, 0), > - CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE); > cond_resched(); > spin_lock(&delayed_refs->lock); > } > @@ -2478,10 +2474,6 @@ int btrfs_run_delayed_refs(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > if (root == root->fs_info->extent_root) > root = root->fs_info->tree_root; > > - do_chunk_alloc(trans, root->fs_info->extent_root, > - 2 * 1024 * 1024, btrfs_get_alloc_profile(root, 0), > - CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE); > - > btrfs_delayed_refs_qgroup_accounting(trans, root->fs_info); > > delayed_refs = &trans->transaction->delayed_refs; > @@ -2551,6 +2543,8 @@ again: > } > > if (run_all) { > + btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(trans, root); > + > node = rb_first(&delayed_refs->root); > if (!node) > goto out; > @@ -3826,7 +3820,8 @@ enum flush_state { > FLUSH_DELALLOC_WAIT = 2, > FLUSH_DELAYED_ITEMS_NR = 3, > FLUSH_DELAYED_ITEMS = 4, > - COMMIT_TRANS = 5, > + ALLOC_CHUNK = 5, > + COMMIT_TRANS = 6, > }; > > static int flush_space(struct btrfs_root *root, > @@ -3863,6 +3858,20 @@ static int flush_space(struct btrfs_root *root, > ret = btrfs_run_delayed_items_nr(trans, root, nr); > btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root); > break; > + case ALLOC_CHUNK: > + trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root); > + if (IS_ERR(trans)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(trans); > + break; > + } > + ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root->fs_info->extent_root, > + num_bytes, > + btrfs_get_alloc_profile(root, 0), > + CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE); > + btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root); > + if (ret == -ENOSPC) > + ret = 0; > + break; > case COMMIT_TRANS: > ret = may_commit_transaction(root, space_info, orig_bytes, 0); > break; > @@ -5515,8 +5524,6 @@ static noinline int find_free_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > struct btrfs_block_group_cache *used_block_group; > u64 search_start = 0; > int empty_cluster = 2 * 1024 * 1024; > - int allowed_chunk_alloc = 0; > - int done_chunk_alloc = 0; > struct btrfs_space_info *space_info; > int loop = 0; > int index = 0; > @@ -5548,9 +5555,6 @@ static noinline int find_free_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > if (btrfs_mixed_space_info(space_info)) > use_cluster = false; > > - if (orig_root->ref_cows || empty_size) > - allowed_chunk_alloc = 1; > - > if (data & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA && use_cluster) { > last_ptr = &root->fs_info->meta_alloc_cluster; > if (!btrfs_test_opt(root, SSD)) > @@ -5860,34 +5864,18 @@ loop: > index = 0; > loop++; > if (loop == LOOP_ALLOC_CHUNK) { > - if (allowed_chunk_alloc) { > - ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root, num_bytes + > - 2 * 1024 * 1024, data, > - CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED); > - /* > - * Do not bail out on ENOSPC since we > - * can do more things. > - */ > - if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOSPC) { > - btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, > - root, ret); > - goto out; > - } > - allowed_chunk_alloc = 0; > - if (ret == 1) > - done_chunk_alloc = 1; > - } else if (!done_chunk_alloc && > - space_info->force_alloc => - CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE) { > - space_info->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED; > + ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root, num_bytes + > + 2 * 1024 * 1024, data, > + CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE); > + /* > + * Do not bail out on ENOSPC since we > + * can do more things. > + */ > + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOSPC) { > + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, > + root, ret); > + goto out; > } > - > - /* > - * We didn''t allocate a chunk, go ahead and drop the > - * empty size and loop again. > - */ > - if (!done_chunk_alloc) > - loop = LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE; > } > > if (loop == LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE) { > @@ -5962,20 +5950,6 @@ int btrfs_reserve_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > > data = btrfs_get_alloc_profile(root, data); > again: > - /* > - * the only place that sets empty_size is btrfs_realloc_node, which > - * is not called recursively on allocations > - */ > - if (empty_size || root->ref_cows) { > - ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root->fs_info->extent_root, > - num_bytes + 2 * 1024 * 1024, data, > - CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE); > - if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOSPC) { > - btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, ret); > - return ret; > - } > - } > - > WARN_ON(num_bytes < root->sectorsize); > ret = find_free_extent(trans, root, num_bytes, empty_size, > hint_byte, ins, data); > @@ -5985,12 +5959,6 @@ again: > num_bytes = num_bytes >> 1; > num_bytes = num_bytes & ~(root->sectorsize - 1); > num_bytes = max(num_bytes, min_alloc_size); > - ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root->fs_info->extent_root, > - num_bytes, data, CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE); > - if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOSPC) { > - btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, ret); > - return ret; > - } > if (num_bytes == min_alloc_size) > final_tried = true; > goto again; > @@ -7828,6 +7796,31 @@ error: > return ret; > } > > +void btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > + struct btrfs_root *root) > +{ > + struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group, *tmp; > + struct btrfs_root *extent_root = root->fs_info->extent_root; > + struct btrfs_block_group_item item; > + struct btrfs_key key; > + int ret; > + > + list_for_each_entry_safe(block_group, tmp, &trans->new_bgs, > + new_bg_list) { > + list_del_init(&block_group->new_bg_list); > + > + spin_lock(&block_group->lock); > + memcpy(&item, &block_group->item, sizeof(item)); > + memcpy(&key, &block_group->key, sizeof(key)); > + spin_unlock(&block_group->lock); > + > + ret = btrfs_insert_item(trans, extent_root, &key, &item, > + sizeof(item)); > + if (ret) > + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, extent_root, ret); > + } > +} > + > int btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > struct btrfs_root *root, u64 bytes_used, > u64 type, u64 chunk_objectid, u64 chunk_offset, > @@ -7861,6 +7854,7 @@ int btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > spin_lock_init(&cache->lock); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->list); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->cluster_list); > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->new_bg_list); > > btrfs_init_free_space_ctl(cache); > > @@ -7892,12 +7886,7 @@ int btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > ret = btrfs_add_block_group_cache(root->fs_info, cache); > BUG_ON(ret); /* Logic error */ > > - ret = btrfs_insert_item(trans, extent_root, &cache->key, &cache->item, > - sizeof(cache->item)); > - if (ret) { > - btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, extent_root, ret); > - return ret; > - } > + list_add_tail(&cache->new_bg_list, &trans->new_bgs); > > set_avail_alloc_bits(extent_root->fs_info, type); > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c > index 0629edf..c01dec7 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c > @@ -374,6 +374,7 @@ again: > h->qgroup_reserved = qgroup_reserved; > h->delayed_ref_elem.seq = 0; > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&h->qgroup_ref_list); > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&h->new_bgs); > > smp_mb(); > if (cur_trans->blocked && may_wait_transaction(root, type)) { > @@ -549,6 +550,9 @@ static int __btrfs_end_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > trans->qgroup_reserved = 0; > } > > + if (!list_empty(&trans->new_bgs)) > + btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(trans, root); > + > while (count < 2) { > unsigned long cur = trans->delayed_ref_updates; > trans->delayed_ref_updates = 0; > @@ -564,6 +568,9 @@ static int __btrfs_end_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > btrfs_trans_release_metadata(trans, root); > trans->block_rsv = NULL; > > + if (!list_empty(&trans->new_bgs)) > + btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(trans, root); > + > if (lock && !atomic_read(&root->fs_info->open_ioctl_trans) && > should_end_transaction(trans, root)) { > trans->transaction->blocked = 1; > @@ -1400,6 +1407,9 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > */ > cur_trans->delayed_refs.flushing = 1; > > + if (!list_empty(&trans->new_bgs)) > + btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(trans, root); > + > ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, root, 0); > if (ret) > goto cleanup_transaction; > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.h b/fs/btrfs/transaction.h > index 1b05480..b6463e1 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.h > +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.h > @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct btrfs_trans_handle { > struct btrfs_root *root; > struct seq_list delayed_ref_elem; > struct list_head qgroup_ref_list; > + struct list_head new_bgs; > }; > > struct btrfs_pending_snapshot { > -- > 1.7.7.6 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:32:05 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 02:04:13PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: >> So we have lots of places where we try to preallocate chunks in order to >> make sure we have enough space as we make our allocations. This has >> historically meant that we''re constantly tweaking when we should allocate a >> new chunk, and historically we have gotten this horribly wrong so we way >> over allocate either metadata or data. To try and keep this from happening >> we are going to make it so that the block group item insertion is done out >> of band at the end of a transaction. This will allow us to create chunks >> even if we are trying to make an allocation for the extent tree. With this >> patch my enospc tests run faster (didn''t expect this) and more efficiently >> use the disk space (this is what I wanted). Thanks, >> > > I''m afraid this does not perform good enough in normal case, here is the > compilebench test: > > # cat btrfs-makej/result-4k > intial create total runs 30 avg 51.99 MB/s (user 0.50s sys 0.85s) > compile total runs 30 avg 98.45 MB/s (user 0.12s sys 0.38s) > read compiled tree total runs 3 avg 19.89 MB/s (user 1.55s sys 3.07s) > delete compiled tree total runs 30 avg 12.15 seconds (user 0.66s sys 2.15s) > > # cat btrfs-josef-makej/result > intial create total runs 30 avg 49.79 MB/s (user 0.52s sys 0.87s) > compile total runs 30 avg 70.01 MB/s (user 0.14s sys 0.44s) > read compiled tree total runs 3 avg 18.46 MB/s (user 1.57s sys 3.16s) > delete compiled tree total runs 30 avg 13.88 seconds (user 0.67s sys 2.18s) > > And the blktrace shows that it makes us do more seeks in create and > compile section.I think it is because the metadata free space become smaller. Without this patch, we may allocate metadata chunks as many as possible until the size of the metadata chunks touches the threshold of the chunk allocation. And then we can allocate the free space linearly, so the seeks are less than the result after we apply this patch.>> @@ -5962,20 +5950,6 @@ int btrfs_reserve_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, >> >> data = btrfs_get_alloc_profile(root, data); >> again: >> - /* >> - * the only place that sets empty_size is btrfs_realloc_node, which >> - * is not called recursively on allocations >> - */ >> - if (empty_size || root->ref_cows) { >> - ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root->fs_info->extent_root, >> - num_bytes + 2 * 1024 * 1024, data, >> - CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE); >> - if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOSPC) { >> - btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, ret); >> - return ret; >> - } >> - } >> - >> WARN_ON(num_bytes < root->sectorsize); >> ret = find_free_extent(trans, root, num_bytes, empty_size, >> hint_byte, ins, data);I think retaining this chunk allocation may help you. Thanks Miao>> @@ -7828,6 +7796,31 @@ error: >> return ret; >> } >> >> +void btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, >> + struct btrfs_root *root) >> +{ >> + struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group, *tmp; >> + struct btrfs_root *extent_root = root->fs_info->extent_root; >> + struct btrfs_block_group_item item; >> + struct btrfs_key key; >> + int ret; >> + >> + list_for_each_entry_safe(block_group, tmp, &trans->new_bgs, >> + new_bg_list) { >> + list_del_init(&block_group->new_bg_list); >> + >> + spin_lock(&block_group->lock); >> + memcpy(&item, &block_group->item, sizeof(item)); >> + memcpy(&key, &block_group->key, sizeof(key)); >> + spin_unlock(&block_group->lock); >> + >> + ret = btrfs_insert_item(trans, extent_root, &key, &item, >> + sizeof(item)); >> + if (ret) >> + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, extent_root, ret); >> + } >> +} >> + >> int btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, >> struct btrfs_root *root, u64 bytes_used, >> u64 type, u64 chunk_objectid, u64 chunk_offset, >> @@ -7861,6 +7854,7 @@ int btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, >> spin_lock_init(&cache->lock); >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->list); >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->cluster_list); >> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->new_bg_list); >> >> btrfs_init_free_space_ctl(cache); >> >> @@ -7892,12 +7886,7 @@ int btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, >> ret = btrfs_add_block_group_cache(root->fs_info, cache); >> BUG_ON(ret); /* Logic error */ >> >> - ret = btrfs_insert_item(trans, extent_root, &cache->key, &cache->item, >> - sizeof(cache->item)); >> - if (ret) { >> - btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, extent_root, ret); >> - return ret; >> - } >> + list_add_tail(&cache->new_bg_list, &trans->new_bgs); >> >> set_avail_alloc_bits(extent_root->fs_info, type); >> >> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c >> index 0629edf..c01dec7 100644 >> --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c >> +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c >> @@ -374,6 +374,7 @@ again: >> h->qgroup_reserved = qgroup_reserved; >> h->delayed_ref_elem.seq = 0; >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&h->qgroup_ref_list); >> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&h->new_bgs); >> >> smp_mb(); >> if (cur_trans->blocked && may_wait_transaction(root, type)) { >> @@ -549,6 +550,9 @@ static int __btrfs_end_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, >> trans->qgroup_reserved = 0; >> } >> >> + if (!list_empty(&trans->new_bgs)) >> + btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(trans, root); >> + >> while (count < 2) { >> unsigned long cur = trans->delayed_ref_updates; >> trans->delayed_ref_updates = 0; >> @@ -564,6 +568,9 @@ static int __btrfs_end_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, >> btrfs_trans_release_metadata(trans, root); >> trans->block_rsv = NULL; >> >> + if (!list_empty(&trans->new_bgs)) >> + btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(trans, root); >> + >> if (lock && !atomic_read(&root->fs_info->open_ioctl_trans) && >> should_end_transaction(trans, root)) { >> trans->transaction->blocked = 1; >> @@ -1400,6 +1407,9 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, >> */ >> cur_trans->delayed_refs.flushing = 1; >> >> + if (!list_empty(&trans->new_bgs)) >> + btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(trans, root); >> + >> ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, root, 0); >> if (ret) >> goto cleanup_transaction; >> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.h b/fs/btrfs/transaction.h >> index 1b05480..b6463e1 100644 >> --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.h >> +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.h >> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct btrfs_trans_handle { >> struct btrfs_root *root; >> struct seq_list delayed_ref_elem; >> struct list_head qgroup_ref_list; >> + struct list_head new_bgs; >> }; >> >> struct btrfs_pending_snapshot { >> -- >> 1.7.7.6 >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:04:13 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:> So we have lots of places where we try to preallocate chunks in order to > make sure we have enough space as we make our allocations. This has > historically meant that we''re constantly tweaking when we should allocate a > new chunk, and historically we have gotten this horribly wrong so we way > over allocate either metadata or data. To try and keep this from happening > we are going to make it so that the block group item insertion is done out > of band at the end of a transaction. This will allow us to create chunks > even if we are trying to make an allocation for the extent tree. With this > patch my enospc tests run faster (didn''t expect this) and more efficiently > use the disk space (this is what I wanted). Thanks,This patch also fixes a deadlock problem that happened when we add two or more small devices(< 4G) into a seed fs(the profile of metadata is RAID1), and a enospc problem when we add a small device (< 256M) into a big empty seed fs(> 60G). (My fix patch which is similar to this one is on the way, I''m a bit slow :) )> @@ -1400,6 +1407,9 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > */ > cur_trans->delayed_refs.flushing = 1; > > + if (!list_empty(&trans->new_bgs)) > + btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(trans, root); > + > ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, root, 0); > if (ret) > goto cleanup_transaction;I think we can not make sure we won''t allocate new chunks when we create the pending snapshots and write out the space cache and inode cache, so we should check ->new_bgs and call btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() when committing the cowonly tree roots. And beside that, We''d better add a BUG_ON() after we update the root tree to make sure there is no pending block group item left in the list. Thanks Miao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:35:55PM -0600, Miao Xie wrote:> On wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:04:13 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > > So we have lots of places where we try to preallocate chunks in order to > > make sure we have enough space as we make our allocations. This has > > historically meant that we''re constantly tweaking when we should allocate a > > new chunk, and historically we have gotten this horribly wrong so we way > > over allocate either metadata or data. To try and keep this from happening > > we are going to make it so that the block group item insertion is done out > > of band at the end of a transaction. This will allow us to create chunks > > even if we are trying to make an allocation for the extent tree. With this > > patch my enospc tests run faster (didn''t expect this) and more efficiently > > use the disk space (this is what I wanted). Thanks, > > This patch also fixes a deadlock problem that happened when we add two or > more small devices(< 4G) into a seed fs(the profile of metadata is RAID1), > and a enospc problem when we add a small device (< 256M) into a big empty > seed fs(> 60G). > > (My fix patch which is similar to this one is on the way, I''m a bit slow :) ) > > > @@ -1400,6 +1407,9 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > > */ > > cur_trans->delayed_refs.flushing = 1; > > > > + if (!list_empty(&trans->new_bgs)) > > + btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(trans, root); > > + > > ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, root, 0); > > if (ret) > > goto cleanup_transaction; > > I think we can not make sure we won''t allocate new chunks when we > create the pending snapshots and write out the space cache and inode > cache, so we should check ->new_bgs and call btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() > when committing the cowonly tree roots. > > And beside that, We''d better add a BUG_ON() after we update the root tree to > make sure there is no pending block group item left in the list. >We''re also running this in run_delayed_refs when we want to run all delayed refs so we should be pretty safe, but a BUG_ON() would definitely make sure we are. Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:32:05PM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 02:04:13PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > > So we have lots of places where we try to preallocate chunks in order to > > make sure we have enough space as we make our allocations. This has > > historically meant that we''re constantly tweaking when we should allocate a > > new chunk, and historically we have gotten this horribly wrong so we way > > over allocate either metadata or data. To try and keep this from happening > > we are going to make it so that the block group item insertion is done out > > of band at the end of a transaction. This will allow us to create chunks > > even if we are trying to make an allocation for the extent tree. With this > > patch my enospc tests run faster (didn''t expect this) and more efficiently > > use the disk space (this is what I wanted). Thanks, > > > > I''m afraid this does not perform good enough in normal case, here is the > compilebench test: > > # cat btrfs-makej/result-4k > intial create total runs 30 avg 51.99 MB/s (user 0.50s sys 0.85s) > compile total runs 30 avg 98.45 MB/s (user 0.12s sys 0.38s) > read compiled tree total runs 3 avg 19.89 MB/s (user 1.55s sys 3.07s) > delete compiled tree total runs 30 avg 12.15 seconds (user 0.66s sys 2.15s) > > # cat btrfs-josef-makej/result > intial create total runs 30 avg 49.79 MB/s (user 0.52s sys 0.87s) > compile total runs 30 avg 70.01 MB/s (user 0.14s sys 0.44s) > read compiled tree total runs 3 avg 18.46 MB/s (user 1.57s sys 3.16s) > delete compiled tree total runs 30 avg 13.88 seconds (user 0.67s sys 2.18s) > > And the blktrace shows that it makes us do more seeks in create and > compile section. > > The patch overall looks clean and good though. >Yeah mostly what I''m looking for is more efficient metadata chunk allocation, and I expected it to have a performance impact somwhere (I just never hit one in my ENOSPC tests). This drop is within reason for me and I''m willing to eat a slight performance drop to not allocate an entire disk with metadata ;). Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html