thr3ads.net - Btrfs devel - [PATCH] btrfs-progs: trivial code style fix in root-tree.c [Aug 2012]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Wang Sheng-Hui

2012-Aug-16 13:17 UTC

[PATCH] btrfs-progs: trivial code style fix in root-tree.c

Add code indent to the bad styled statements.

Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
---
 root-tree.c |   10 ++++------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/root-tree.c b/root-tree.c
index 782472c..39cfef6 100644
--- a/root-tree.c
+++ b/root-tree.c
@@ -182,12 +182,10 @@ int btrfs_del_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *root,
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
 	if (ret) {
-btrfs_print_leaf(root, path->nodes[0]);
-printk("failed to del %llu %u %llu\n",
-	(unsigned long long)key->objectid,
-	key->type,
-	(unsigned long long)key->offset);
-
+		btrfs_print_leaf(root, path->nodes[0]);
+		printk("failed to del %llu %u %llu\n",
+			(unsigned long long)key->objectid, key->type,
+			(unsigned long long)key->offset);
 	}
 	BUG_ON(ret != 0);
 	leaf = path->nodes[0];
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Arne Jansen

2012-Aug-16 13:23 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: trivial code style fix in root-tree.c

On 16.08.2012 15:17, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:> Add code indent to the bad styled statements.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
> ---
>  root-tree.c |   10 ++++------
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/root-tree.c b/root-tree.c
> index 782472c..39cfef6 100644
> --- a/root-tree.c
> +++ b/root-tree.c
> @@ -182,12 +182,10 @@ int btrfs_del_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *root,
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto out;
>  	if (ret) {
> -btrfs_print_leaf(root, path->nodes[0]);
> -printk("failed to del %llu %u %llu\n",
> -	(unsigned long long)key->objectid,
> -	key->type,
> -	(unsigned long long)key->offset);
> -
I guess Alexander intentionally put in the bad indentation
to remind him to remove this code before submitting the
patch :)
> +		btrfs_print_leaf(root, path->nodes[0]);
> +		printk("failed to del %llu %u %llu\n",
> +			(unsigned long long)key->objectid, key->type,
> +			(unsigned long long)key->offset);
>  	}
>  	BUG_ON(ret != 0);
>  	leaf = path->nodes[0];
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Wang Sheng-Hui

2012-Aug-16 13:26 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: trivial code style fix in root-tree.c

On 2012年08月16日 21:23, Arne Jansen wrote:> On 16.08.2012 15:17, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
>> Add code indent to the bad styled statements.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  root-tree.c |   10 ++++------
>>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/root-tree.c b/root-tree.c
>> index 782472c..39cfef6 100644
>> --- a/root-tree.c
>> +++ b/root-tree.c
>> @@ -182,12 +182,10 @@ int btrfs_del_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle
*trans, struct btrfs_root *root,
>>  	if (ret < 0)
>>  		goto out;
>>  	if (ret) {
>> -btrfs_print_leaf(root, path->nodes[0]);
>> -printk("failed to del %llu %u %llu\n",
>> -	(unsigned long long)key->objectid,
>> -	key->type,
>> -	(unsigned long long)key->offset);
>> -
> 
> I guess Alexander intentionally put in the bad indentation
> to remind him to remove this code before submitting the
> patch :)
> 
>> +		btrfs_print_leaf(root, path->nodes[0]);
>> +		printk("failed to del %llu %u %llu\n",
>> +			(unsigned long long)key->objectid, key->type,
>> +			(unsigned long long)key->offset);
>>  	}
When I saw the BUG_ON, I wonder do we still need the above branch statement.
It looks just to be helpful for debug - give out some info, right? 
>>  	BUG_ON(ret != 0);
>>  	leaf = path->nodes[0];
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Arne Jansen

2012-Aug-16 13:30 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: trivial code style fix in root-tree.c

On 16.08.2012 15:26, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:> On 2012年08月16日 21:23, Arne Jansen wrote:
>> On 16.08.2012 15:17, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
>>> Add code indent to the bad styled statements.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  root-tree.c |   10 ++++------
>>>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/root-tree.c b/root-tree.c
>>> index 782472c..39cfef6 100644
>>> --- a/root-tree.c
>>> +++ b/root-tree.c
>>> @@ -182,12 +182,10 @@ int btrfs_del_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle
*trans, struct btrfs_root *root,
>>>  	if (ret < 0)
>>>  		goto out;
>>>  	if (ret) {
>>> -btrfs_print_leaf(root, path->nodes[0]);
>>> -printk("failed to del %llu %u %llu\n",
>>> -	(unsigned long long)key->objectid,
>>> -	key->type,
>>> -	(unsigned long long)key->offset);
>>> -
>>
>> I guess Alexander intentionally put in the bad indentation
>> to remind him to remove this code before submitting the
>> patch :)
>>
>>> +		btrfs_print_leaf(root, path->nodes[0]);
>>> +		printk("failed to del %llu %u %llu\n",
>>> +			(unsigned long long)key->objectid, key->type,
>>> +			(unsigned long long)key->offset);
>>>  	}
> 
> When I saw the BUG_ON, I wonder do we still need the above branch
statement.
> It looks just to be helpful for debug - give out some info, right? 
Yes. So either we delete it completely or we move the BUG_ON
into the block as a BUG_ON(1) and add a "Btrfs: "-prefix to the
printk.
On the other hand, I just saw this is progs, so I think it can
just be deleted.
> 
>>>  	BUG_ON(ret != 0);
>>>  	leaf = path->nodes[0];
>>
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Wang Sheng-Hui

2012-Aug-16 14:25 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: trivial code style fix in root-tree.c

On 2012年08月16日 21:30, Arne Jansen wrote:> On 16.08.2012 15:26, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
>> On 2012年08月16日 21:23, Arne Jansen wrote:
>>> On 16.08.2012 15:17, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
>>>> Add code indent to the bad styled statements.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  root-tree.c |   10 ++++------
>>>>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/root-tree.c b/root-tree.c
>>>> index 782472c..39cfef6 100644
>>>> --- a/root-tree.c
>>>> +++ b/root-tree.c
>>>> @@ -182,12 +182,10 @@ int btrfs_del_root(struct
btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root,
>>>>  	if (ret < 0)
>>>>  		goto out;
>>>>  	if (ret) {
>>>> -btrfs_print_leaf(root, path->nodes[0]);
>>>> -printk("failed to del %llu %u %llu\n",
>>>> -	(unsigned long long)key->objectid,
>>>> -	key->type,
>>>> -	(unsigned long long)key->offset);
>>>> -
>>>
>>> I guess Alexander intentionally put in the bad indentation
>>> to remind him to remove this code before submitting the
>>> patch :)
>>>
>>>> +		btrfs_print_leaf(root, path->nodes[0]);
>>>> +		printk("failed to del %llu %u %llu\n",
>>>> +			(unsigned long long)key->objectid, key->type,
>>>> +			(unsigned long long)key->offset);
>>>>  	}
>>
>> When I saw the BUG_ON, I wonder do we still need the above branch
statement.
>> It looks just to be helpful for debug - give out some info, right? 
> 
> Yes. So either we delete it completely or we move the BUG_ON
> into the block as a BUG_ON(1) and add a "Btrfs: "-prefix to the
> printk.
> On the other hand, I just saw this is progs, so I think it can
> just be deleted.
> 
>>
>>>>  	BUG_ON(ret != 0);
>>>>  	leaf = path->nodes[0];
>>>
>>
> 
Patch regenerated. Please check it. Thanks,

From 2150cb3a3f75416b56a5eb9311fd0d4aa5aaaed5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:23:07 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: code cleanup for root-tree.c/btrfs_del_root

Remove the redundant if check on the condition ret > 0.
Leave BUG_ON check here.

Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
---
 root-tree.c |    8 --------
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/root-tree.c b/root-tree.c
index 782472c..4578514 100644
--- a/root-tree.c
+++ b/root-tree.c
@@ -181,14 +181,6 @@ int btrfs_del_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct
btrfs_root *root,
 	ret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, root, key, path, -1, 1);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
-	if (ret) {
-btrfs_print_leaf(root, path->nodes[0]);
-printk("failed to del %llu %u %llu\n",
-	(unsigned long long)key->objectid,
-	key->type,
-	(unsigned long long)key->offset);
-
-	}
 	BUG_ON(ret != 0);
 	leaf = path->nodes[0];
 	ri = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, path->slots[0], struct btrfs_root_item);
-- 
1.7.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Btrfs devel - Aug 2012 - [PATCH] btrfs-progs: trivial code style fix in root-tree.c

[PATCH] btrfs-progs: trivial code style fix in root-tree.c

Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: trivial code style fix in root-tree.c

Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: trivial code style fix in root-tree.c

Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: trivial code style fix in root-tree.c

Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: trivial code style fix in root-tree.c