Josef Bacik
2011-Aug-30 15:41 UTC
[PATCH] Btrfs: don''t get the block_rsv in btrfs_free_tree_block
Since the durable block rsv stuff has been killed there is no need to get the
block_rsv in btrfs_free_tree_block anymore.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 4 ----
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 53f6dbd..d236df7 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -4707,7 +4707,6 @@ void btrfs_free_tree_block(struct btrfs_trans_handle
*trans,
struct extent_buffer *buf,
u64 parent, int last_ref)
{
- struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv;
struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache = NULL;
int ret;
@@ -4722,10 +4721,7 @@ void btrfs_free_tree_block(struct btrfs_trans_handle
*trans,
if (!last_ref)
return;
- block_rsv = get_block_rsv(trans, root);
cache = btrfs_lookup_block_group(root->fs_info, buf->start);
- if (block_rsv->space_info != cache->space_info)
- goto out;
if (btrfs_header_generation(buf) == trans->transid) {
if (root->root_key.objectid != BTRFS_TREE_LOG_OBJECTID) {
--
1.7.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html