Zhu Yanhai
2010-Mar-05 07:30 UTC
Do you think it''s time to tag a new version number for btrfs-progs?
Hi Chris, The latest release of btrfs-progs is still v0.19, at 2009-06-11. As it already has some major features since then, do you think it''s time to give it a 0.20 version number and release? It will be nice for the various Linux distribution teams to integrate. Thanks, Zhu Yanhai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Andy Lutomirski
2010-Mar-07 04:22 UTC
Re: Do you think it''s time to tag a new version number for btrfs-progs?
Zhu Yanhai wrote:> Hi Chris, > The latest release of btrfs-progs is still v0.19, at 2009-06-11. As it > already has some major features since then, do you think it''s time to > give it a 0.20 version number and release? It will be nice for the > various Linux distribution teams to integrate.Have recent patches even been committed anywhere public? btrfs-progs-unstable.git hasn''t been updated since November. --Andy> > Thanks, > Zhu Yanhai > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Goffredo Baroncelli
2010-Mar-07 14:47 UTC
Re: Do you think it''s time to tag a new version number for btrfs-progs?
On Sunday 07 March 2010, Andy Lutomirski wrote:> Zhu Yanhai wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > The latest release of btrfs-progs is still v0.19, at 2009-06-11.As it> > already has some major features since then, do you think it''s timeto> > give it a 0.20 version number and release? It will be nice for the > > various Linux distribution teams to integrate. > > Have recent patches even been committed anywhere public? > btrfs-progs-unstable.git hasn''t been updated since November. >See the "subvol" branch. It was updated 6 day ago http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs- unstable.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/subvol Goffredo> --Andy-- gpg key@ keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (ghigo) <kreijackATinwind.it> Key fingerprint = 4769 7E51 5293 D36C 814E C054 BF04 F161 3DC5 0512 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Andy Lutomirski
2010-Mar-08 13:47 UTC
Re: Do you think it''s time to tag a new version number for btrfs-progs?
Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:> On Sunday 07 March 2010, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> Zhu Yanhai wrote: >>> Hi Chris, >>> The latest release of btrfs-progs is still v0.19, at 2009-06-11. > As it >>> already has some major features since then, do you think it''s time > to >>> give it a 0.20 version number and release? It will be nice for the >>> various Linux distribution teams to integrate. >> Have recent patches even been committed anywhere public? >> btrfs-progs-unstable.git hasn''t been updated since November. >> > > See the "subvol" branch. It was updated 6 day ago > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs- > unstable.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/subvolThanks. That''s what I get for not scrolling down far enough. --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html