thr3ads.net - Btrfs devel - [btrfs] kernel BUG at include/linux/spinlock.h:376! [Jan 2010]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Johannes Hirte

2010-Jan-07 21:29 UTC

[btrfs] kernel BUG at include/linux/spinlock.h:376!

One of my btrfs filesystems gives the following bug message on access:

Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: kernel BUG at include/linux/spinlock.h:376!
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: last sysfs file: 
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:18.3/temp1_input
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: CPU 1
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: Pid: 2837, comm: btrfs-endio-wri Not tainted 
2.6.33-rc3-00033-g03b7675 #12 TYAN Tiger K8W Dual AMD Opteron, S2875/To Be 
Filled
By O.E.M.
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8118f7ea>] 
[<ffffffff8118f7ea>]
btrfs_assert_tree_locked+0x16/0x1c
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff8800237b5a50  EFLAGS: 00010246
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: RAX: 0000000000000404 RBX: ffff88011f444ea0 
RCX: ffff880000000000
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: ffff88011c219000 
RDI: ffff8800829b3c00
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: RBP: ffff8800237b5a50 R08: 0000000000000016 
R09: ffff8800237b5a30
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: R10: ffff8800237b5a28 R11: 0000000000000191 
R12: ffff88011c219000
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: R13: 000000000000000c R14: 0000000000000001 
R15: ffff88011981e740
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: FS:  00007f2c79ac8700(0000) 
GS:ffff88002b400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 
000000008005003b
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: CR2: 00000000026300a0 CR3: 0000000116b7f000 
CR4: 00000000000006f0
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 
DR2: 0000000000000000
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 
DR7: 0000000000000400
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: Process btrfs-endio-wri (pid: 2837, 
threadinfo ffff8800237b4000, task ffff8800235037e0)
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: Stack:
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: ffff8800237b5ac0 ffffffff81154ded
000000000000012c
000000000000000c
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: <0> ffff880000000016 0000000181150b93 
0000000000000ce3 00000f6600000000
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: <0> ffff88007ff44000 ffff8800829b3d00 
0000000000000000 ffff88011f444ea0
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: Call Trace:
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff81154ded>]
push_leaf_left+0x9f/0x158
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff8115539e>]
btrfs_del_items+0x363/0x48f
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff81175b06>] 
btrfs_mark_extent_written+0x53b/0x55f
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff8105616c>] ?
trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff8138bc85>] ?
mutex_unlock+0x9/0xb
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff8117422d>] 
btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x176/0x247
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff810544cf>] ?
trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff81174313>] 
btrfs_writepage_end_io_hook+0x15/0x17
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff81184dd5>] 
end_bio_extent_writepage+0xa9/0x154
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff8105613b>] ? 
trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10c/0x130
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff810c8d27>] bio_endio+0x26/0x28
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff81167b8d>] 
end_workqueue_fn+0x10c/0x11b
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff8118d259>]
worker_loop+0x175/0x44d
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff8118d0e4>] ?
worker_loop+0x0/0x44d
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff81047197>] kthread+0x7a/0x82
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff81002c94>] 
kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff8138e13c>] ?
restore_args+0x0/0x30
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff8104711d>] ? kthread+0x0/0x82
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff81002c90>] ? 
kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: Code: c8 ff 48 81 c4 88 00 00 00 5b 41 5c 41 
5d 41 5e 41 5f c9 c3 90 f6 47 38 02 55 48 89 e5 75 10 8b 47 70 89 c2 c1 fa 08 
38 c
2 75 04 <0f> 0b eb fe c9 c3 55 31 c0 65 48 8b 14 25 48 b5 00 00 48 89 e5
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: RIP  [<ffffffff8118f7ea>] 
btrfs_assert_tree_locked+0x16/0x1c
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: RSP <ffff8800237b5a50>
Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: ---[ end trace 96d932f09da027f6 ]---

It only happens on write access. I was able to copy all the data to another 
drive without any error. The filesystem is damaged, btrfsck gives

root 5 inode 6969680 errors 2000
found 191511994368 bytes used err is 1
total csum bytes: 186404900
total tree bytes: 629936128
total fs tree bytes: 388333568
btree space waste bytes: 146015924
file data blocks allocated: 191957340160
 referenced 190751694848
Btrfs v0.19-4-gab8fb4c

It''s the btrfs-code from 2.6.33 with the following additional patches:

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/acl.c b/fs/btrfs/acl.c
index 2e9e699..3a3a96d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/acl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/acl.c
@@ -111,13 +111,15 @@ static int btrfs_set_acl(struct btrfs_trans_handle 
*trans,

        switch (type) {
        case ACL_TYPE_ACCESS:
-               mode = inode->i_mode;
-               ret = posix_acl_equiv_mode(acl, &mode);
-               if (ret < 0)
-                       return ret;
-               ret = 0;
-               inode->i_mode = mode;
                name = POSIX_ACL_XATTR_ACCESS;
+               if (acl) {
+                       mode = inode->i_mode;
+                       ret = posix_acl_equiv_mode(acl, &mode);
+                       if (ret < 0)
+                               return ret;
+                       ret = 0;
+                       inode->i_mode = mode;
+               }
                break;
        case ACL_TYPE_DEFAULT:
                if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index c4bc570..654f702 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
@@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ int btrfs_realloc_node(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
                        if (!cur) {
                                cur = read_tree_block(root, blocknr,
                                                         blocksize, gen);
-                       } else if (!uptodate) {
+                       } else {
                                btrfs_read_buffer(cur, gen);
                        }
                }

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
index a972868..ed3e4a2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
@@ -3281,8 +3281,10 @@ static noinline_for_stack int 
relocate_block_group(struct reloc_control *rc)
                return -ENOMEM;

        path = btrfs_alloc_path();
-       if (!path)
+       if (!path) {
+               kfree(cluster);
                return -ENOMEM;
+       }

        rc->extents_found = 0;
        rc->extents_skipped = 0;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 198cff2..220dad5 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -2649,8 +2649,10 @@ again:
        em = lookup_extent_mapping(em_tree, logical, *length);
        read_unlock(&em_tree->lock);

-       if (!em && unplug_page)
+       if (!em && unplug_page) {
+               kfree(multi);
                return 0;
+       }

        if (!em) {
                printk(KERN_CRIT "unable to find logical %llu len
%llu\n",

I don''t think that anyone of these patches causes the bug or FS
corruption.

regards,
  Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Johannes Hirte

2010-Jan-14 15:36 UTC

head link

Re: [btrfs] kernel BUG at include/linux/spinlock.h:376!

Am Donnerstag 07 Januar 2010 22:29:32 schrieb Johannes
Hirte:> One of my btrfs filesystems gives the following bug message on access:
> 
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: kernel BUG at
> include/linux/spinlock.h:376! Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: invalid
> opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: last sysfs file:
> /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:18.3/temp1_input
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: CPU 1
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: Pid: 2837, comm: btrfs-endio-wri Not
> tainted 2.6.33-rc3-00033-g03b7675 #12 TYAN Tiger K8W Dual AMD Opteron,
> S2875/To Be Filled
> By O.E.M.
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8118f7ea>] 
> [<ffffffff8118f7ea>] btrfs_assert_tree_locked+0x16/0x1c
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff8800237b5a50  EFLAGS:
> 00010246 Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: RAX: 0000000000000404 RBX:
> ffff88011f444ea0 RCX: ffff880000000000
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI:
> ffff88011c219000 RDI: ffff8800829b3c00
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: RBP: ffff8800237b5a50 R08:
> 0000000000000016 R09: ffff8800237b5a30
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: R10: ffff8800237b5a28 R11:
> 0000000000000191 R12: ffff88011c219000
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: R13: 000000000000000c R14:
> 0000000000000001 R15: ffff88011981e740
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: FS:  00007f2c79ac8700(0000)
> GS:ffff88002b400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0:
> 000000008005003b
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: CR2: 00000000026300a0 CR3:
> 0000000116b7f000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1:
> 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6:
> 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: Process btrfs-endio-wri (pid: 2837,
> threadinfo ffff8800237b4000, task ffff8800235037e0)
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: Stack:
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: ffff8800237b5ac0 ffffffff81154ded
> 000000000000012c 000000000000000c
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: <0> ffff880000000016
0000000181150b93
> 0000000000000ce3 00000f6600000000
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: <0> ffff88007ff44000
ffff8800829b3d00
> 0000000000000000 ffff88011f444ea0
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: Call Trace:
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff81154ded>]
> push_leaf_left+0x9f/0x158 Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel:
> [<ffffffff8115539e>] btrfs_del_items+0x363/0x48f Jan  6 23:08:12
datengrab
> kernel: [<ffffffff81175b06>]
> btrfs_mark_extent_written+0x53b/0x55f
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff8105616c>] ?
> trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel:
> [<ffffffff8138bc85>] ? mutex_unlock+0x9/0xb Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab
> kernel: [<ffffffff8117422d>]
> btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x176/0x247
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff810544cf>] ?
> trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel:
> [<ffffffff81174313>]
> btrfs_writepage_end_io_hook+0x15/0x17
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff81184dd5>]
> end_bio_extent_writepage+0xa9/0x154
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff8105613b>] ?
> trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10c/0x130
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff810c8d27>]
bio_endio+0x26/0x28
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff81167b8d>]
> end_workqueue_fn+0x10c/0x11b
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff8118d259>]
> worker_loop+0x175/0x44d Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel:
> [<ffffffff8118d0e4>] ? worker_loop+0x0/0x44d Jan  6 23:08:12
datengrab
> kernel: [<ffffffff81047197>] kthread+0x7a/0x82 Jan  6 23:08:12
datengrab
> kernel: [<ffffffff81002c94>]
> kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: [<ffffffff8138e13c>] ?
> restore_args+0x0/0x30 Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel:
> [<ffffffff8104711d>] ? kthread+0x0/0x82 Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab
kernel:
> [<ffffffff81002c90>] ?
> kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: Code: c8 ff 48 81 c4 88 00 00 00 5b 41 5c
> 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c9 c3 90 f6 47 38 02 55 48 89 e5 75 10 8b 47 70 89 c2 c1
> fa 08 38 c
> 2 75 04 <0f> 0b eb fe c9 c3 55 31 c0 65 48 8b 14 25 48 b5 00 00 48 89
e5
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: RIP  [<ffffffff8118f7ea>]
> btrfs_assert_tree_locked+0x16/0x1c
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: RSP <ffff8800237b5a50>
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: ---[ end trace 96d932f09da027f6 ]---
> 
> It only happens on write access. I was able to copy all the data to another
> drive without any error. The filesystem is damaged, btrfsck gives
> 
> root 5 inode 6969680 errors 2000
> found 191511994368 bytes used err is 1
> total csum bytes: 186404900
> total tree bytes: 629936128
> total fs tree bytes: 388333568
> btree space waste bytes: 146015924
> file data blocks allocated: 191957340160
>  referenced 190751694848
> Btrfs v0.19-4-gab8fb4c
> 
> It''s the btrfs-code from 2.6.33 with the following additional
patches:
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/acl.c b/fs/btrfs/acl.c
> index 2e9e699..3a3a96d 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/acl.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/acl.c
> @@ -111,13 +111,15 @@ static int btrfs_set_acl(struct btrfs_trans_handle
> *trans,
> 
>         switch (type) {
>         case ACL_TYPE_ACCESS:
> -               mode = inode->i_mode;
> -               ret = posix_acl_equiv_mode(acl, &mode);
> -               if (ret < 0)
> -                       return ret;
> -               ret = 0;
> -               inode->i_mode = mode;
>                 name = POSIX_ACL_XATTR_ACCESS;
> +               if (acl) {
> +                       mode = inode->i_mode;
> +                       ret = posix_acl_equiv_mode(acl, &mode);
> +                       if (ret < 0)
> +                               return ret;
> +                       ret = 0;
> +                       inode->i_mode = mode;
> +               }
>                 break;
>         case ACL_TYPE_DEFAULT:
>                 if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> index c4bc570..654f702 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> @@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ int btrfs_realloc_node(struct btrfs_trans_handle
> *trans, if (!cur) {
>                                 cur = read_tree_block(root, blocknr,
>                                                          blocksize, gen);
> -                       } else if (!uptodate) {
> +                       } else {
>                                 btrfs_read_buffer(cur, gen);
>                         }
>                 }
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
> index a972868..ed3e4a2 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
> @@ -3281,8 +3281,10 @@ static noinline_for_stack int
> relocate_block_group(struct reloc_control *rc)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
> 
>         path = btrfs_alloc_path();
> -       if (!path)
> +       if (!path) {
> +               kfree(cluster);
>                 return -ENOMEM;
> +       }
> 
>         rc->extents_found = 0;
>         rc->extents_skipped = 0;
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 198cff2..220dad5 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -2649,8 +2649,10 @@ again:
>         em = lookup_extent_mapping(em_tree, logical, *length);
>         read_unlock(&em_tree->lock);
> 
> -       if (!em && unplug_page)
> +       if (!em && unplug_page) {
> +               kfree(multi);
>                 return 0;
> +       }
> 
>         if (!em) {
>                 printk(KERN_CRIT "unable to find logical %llu len
%llu\n",
> 
> I don''t think that anyone of these patches causes the bug or FS
corruption.
> 
> regards,
>   Johannes
Noone any ideas here? If more infos are needed, please say.

regards,
  Johannes

Chris Mason

2010-Jan-14 19:37 UTC

head link

Re: [btrfs] kernel BUG at include/linux/spinlock.h:376!

On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 10:29:32PM +0100, Johannes Hirte
wrote:> One of my btrfs filesystems gives the following bug message on access:
> 
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: kernel BUG at
include/linux/spinlock.h:376!
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: last sysfs file: 
> /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:18.3/temp1_input
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: CPU 1
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: Pid: 2837, comm: btrfs-endio-wri Not
tainted
> 2.6.33-rc3-00033-g03b7675 #12 TYAN Tiger K8W Dual AMD Opteron, S2875/To Be 
> Filled
> By O.E.M.
> Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8118f7ea>] 
[<ffffffff8118f7ea>]
> btrfs_assert_tree_locked+0x16/0x1c
Well, we really should have this tree block locked, but
btrfs_mark_extent_written is doing some special things.  Is the trace
always the same?

If so, please try this patch:

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 3bfe9f0..1148aa0 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -572,6 +572,7 @@ again:
 	key.objectid = inode->i_ino;
 	key.type = BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY;
 	key.offset = split;
+	path->keep_locks = 1;
 
 	ret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, root, &key, path, -1, 1);
 	if (ret > 0 && path->slots[0] > 0)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Johannes Hirte

2010-Jan-23 20:23 UTC

head link

Re: [btrfs] kernel BUG at include/linux/spinlock.h:376!

Am Donnerstag 14 Januar 2010 20:37:08 schrieb Chris
Mason:> On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 10:29:32PM +0100, Johannes Hirte wrote:
> > One of my btrfs filesystems gives the following bug message on access:
> > 
> > Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: kernel BUG at
> > include/linux/spinlock.h:376! Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel:
invalid
> > opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> > Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: last sysfs file:
> > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:18.3/temp1_input
> > Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: CPU 1
> > Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: Pid: 2837, comm: btrfs-endio-wri Not
> > tainted 2.6.33-rc3-00033-g03b7675 #12 TYAN Tiger K8W Dual AMD Opteron,
> > S2875/To Be Filled
> > By O.E.M.
> > Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8118f7ea>]
> > [<ffffffff8118f7ea>] btrfs_assert_tree_locked+0x16/0x1c
> 
> Well, we really should have this tree block locked, but
> btrfs_mark_extent_written is doing some special things.  Is the trace
> always the same?
Sorry for the long delay. Yes the trace was always the same. I can''t
test
patches, since I''m not working on the corrupted FS anymore. The bug
only
occurred on the corrupted filesystem. But as I''ve seen, Yan Zheng has
tracked
it down (commit 6c7d54ac87f338c479d9729e8392eca3f76e11e1). 

I still suspect that the FS corruption was caused by this bug. It
didn''t
happened again. If so, I''ll report.

regards,
  Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Chris Mason

2010-Jan-25 15:17 UTC

head link

Re: [btrfs] kernel BUG at include/linux/spinlock.h:376!

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 09:23:56PM +0100, Johannes Hirte
wrote:> Am Donnerstag 14 Januar 2010 20:37:08 schrieb Chris Mason:
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 10:29:32PM +0100, Johannes Hirte wrote:
> > > One of my btrfs filesystems gives the following bug message on
access:
> > > 
> > > Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: ------------[ cut here
]------------
> > > Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: kernel BUG at
> > > include/linux/spinlock.h:376! Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel:
invalid
> > > opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> > > Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: last sysfs file:
> > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:18.3/temp1_input
> > > Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: CPU 1
> > > Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: Pid: 2837, comm:
btrfs-endio-wri Not
> > > tainted 2.6.33-rc3-00033-g03b7675 #12 TYAN Tiger K8W Dual AMD
Opteron,
> > > S2875/To Be Filled
> > > By O.E.M.
> > > Jan  6 23:08:12 datengrab kernel: RIP:
0010:[<ffffffff8118f7ea>]
> > > [<ffffffff8118f7ea>] btrfs_assert_tree_locked+0x16/0x1c
> > 
> > Well, we really should have this tree block locked, but
> > btrfs_mark_extent_written is doing some special things.  Is the trace
> > always the same?
> 
> Sorry for the long delay. Yes the trace was always the same. I
can''t test
> patches, since I''m not working on the corrupted FS anymore. The
bug only
> occurred on the corrupted filesystem. But as I''ve seen, Yan Zheng
has tracked
> it down (commit 6c7d54ac87f338c479d9729e8392eca3f76e11e1). 
> 
> I still suspect that the FS corruption was caused by this bug. It
didn''t
> happened again. If so, I''ll report.
Right, we should have it fixed now, thanks for the report.

-chris

Btrfs devel - Jan 2010 - [btrfs] kernel BUG at include/linux/spinlock.h:376!

[btrfs] kernel BUG at include/linux/spinlock.h:376!

Re: [btrfs] kernel BUG at include/linux/spinlock.h:376!

Re: [btrfs] kernel BUG at include/linux/spinlock.h:376!

Re: [btrfs] kernel BUG at include/linux/spinlock.h:376!

Re: [btrfs] kernel BUG at include/linux/spinlock.h:376!