Hi, Recently, I''ve red btrfsck.c of btrfs-progs to study the internal of btrfs. However, I may find typo in pick_next_pending() of btrfsck.c The first index of bits[] which is initialized should be 0, I think. Signed-off-by: TARUISI Hiroaki <taruishi.hiroak@jp.fujitsu.com> --- diff --git a/btrfsck.c b/btrfsck.c index 40c90f8..f961c9b 100644 --- a/btrfsck.c +++ b/btrfsck.c @@ -1920,7 +1920,7 @@ static int pick_next_pending(struct cache_tree *pending, cache = find_first_cache_extent(reada, 0); if (cache) { bits[0].start = cache->start; - bits[1].size = cache->size; + bits[0].size = cache->size; *reada_bits = 1; return 1; } -- taruisi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html