Friday November 30 2007 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
7:17PM |
1 |
backgroundrb not cleaning up tmp files? |
6:57PM |
2 |
which version of backgroundrb to use |
|
Sunday November 25 2007 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
1:43AM |
2 |
Fwd: Render_to_string from a worker |
|
Thursday November 22 2007 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
2:40PM |
0 |
How to get result from do_work in a worker |
|
Wednesday November 21 2007 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
12:06AM |
2 |
Is fork { } safe inside of a worker? How else may this be done... |
|
Friday November 16 2007 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
12:46PM |
1 |
Backgroundrb with Load Balancing Rails engines |
|
Wednesday November 14 2007 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:11PM |
1 |
couple of questions |
2:40PM |
0 |
Worker status bug in new version |
5:01AM |
7 |
BackgrounDRb version 1.0RC1 available now |
|
Monday November 12 2007 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
8:31PM |
1 |
Worker start lag |
4:05PM |
0 |
Workers calling Workers |
|
Friday November 9 2007 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
4:05PM |
3 |
Why the switch to SMTP |
3:08PM |
2 |
Backgroundrb alternative idea |
|
Wednesday November 7 2007 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
5:51PM |
2 |
workers cleanup |
|
Friday November 2 2007 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:05AM |
10 |
pre-release version of backgroundrb available now from svn |