Friday November 30 2007 | ||
Time | Replies | Subject |
---|---|---|
7:17PM | 1 | backgroundrb not cleaning up tmp files? |
6:57PM | 2 | which version of backgroundrb to use |
Sunday November 25 2007 | ||
Time | Replies | Subject |
1:43AM | 2 | Fwd: Render_to_string from a worker |
Thursday November 22 2007 | ||
Time | Replies | Subject |
2:40PM | 0 | How to get result from do_work in a worker |
Wednesday November 21 2007 | ||
Time | Replies | Subject |
12:06AM | 2 | Is fork { } safe inside of a worker? How else may this be done... |
Friday November 16 2007 | ||
Time | Replies | Subject |
12:46PM | 1 | Backgroundrb with Load Balancing Rails engines |
Wednesday November 14 2007 | ||
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:11PM | 1 | couple of questions |
2:40PM | 0 | Worker status bug in new version |
5:01AM | 7 | BackgrounDRb version 1.0RC1 available now |
Monday November 12 2007 | ||
Time | Replies | Subject |
8:31PM | 1 | Worker start lag |
4:05PM | 0 | Workers calling Workers |
Friday November 9 2007 | ||
Time | Replies | Subject |
4:05PM | 3 | Why the switch to SMTP |
3:08PM | 2 | Backgroundrb alternative idea |
Wednesday November 7 2007 | ||
Time | Replies | Subject |
5:51PM | 2 | workers cleanup |
Friday November 2 2007 | ||
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:05AM | 10 | pre-release version of backgroundrb available now from svn |