thr3ads.net - asterisk users - [asterisk-users] INVITE from DID: No matching endpoint found but completes the call anyway [Jan 2019]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Brian J. Murrell

2019-Jan-26 17:55 UTC

[asterisk-users] INVITE from DID: No matching endpoint found but completes the call anyway

I have a trunk set up for the DID from my provider:

[my_provider]
type=registration
outbound_auth=my_provider
server_uri=sip:sip.example.com
client_uri=sip:my_username at sip.example.com
retry_interval=60
 
[my_provider]
type=auth
auth_type=userpass
password=123456
username=my_username
 
[my_provider]
type=aor
contact=sip:sip.example.com:5060
 
[my_provider]
type=endpoint
context=from-my_provider
disallow=all
allow=ulaw
outbound_auth=my_provider
aors=my_provider
 
[my_provider]
type=identify
endpoint=my_provider
match=sip.example.com

And it registers fine:

 <Registration/ServerURI..............................> 
<Auth..........>  <Status.......>
=========================================================================================
 mytrunk/sip:sip.example.com                             my_provider      
Registered


And when it gets an INVITE from my provider (192.168.0.1):

<--- Received SIP request (997 bytes) from UDP:192.168.0.1:5060 --->
INVITE sip:1235551212 at 10.75.22.5:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK06d035fd;rport
Max-Forwards: 70
From: "Fred Flintstone" <sip:4565551212 at
192.168.0.1>;tag=as539f9476
To: <sip:1235551212 at 10.75.22.5:5060>
Contact: <sip:4565551212 at 192.168.0.1:5060>
Call-ID: 3ef877dc4477d8ce4aae29965c5d0875 at 192.168.0.1:5060
CSeq: 102 INVITE
User-Agent: foobar
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 17:40:00 GMT
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO,
PUBLISH, MESSAGE
Supported: replaces, timer
Remote-Party-ID: "Fred Flintstone" <sip:4565551212 at
192.168.0.1>;party=calling;privacy=off;screen=no
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 295

[SDP redacted]

It logs an error:

[Jan 26 12:40:00] NOTICE[21775]: res_pjsip/pjsip_distributor.c:525
log_failed_request: Request 'INVITE' from '"Fred
Flintstone" <sip:4565551212 at 192.168.0.1>' failed for
'192.168.0.1:5060' (callid: 3ef877dc4477d8ce4aae29965c5d0875 at
192.168.0.1:5060) - No matching endpoint found

But then goes on to complete the call:

<--- Transmitting SIP response (352 bytes) to UDP:192.168.0.1:5060 --->
SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.0.1:5060;rport=5060;received=192.168.0.1;branch=z9hG4bK06d035fd
Call-ID: 3ef877dc4477d8ce4aae29965c5d0875 at 192.168.0.1:5060
From: "Fred Flintstone" <sip:4565551212 at
192.168.0.1>;tag=as539f9476
To: <sip:1235551212 at 10.75.22.5>
CSeq: 102 INVITE
Server: Asterisk PBX 13.11.1
Content-Length:  0

[ launch into dialplan ]

So why the spurious error when it was able to complete the call?

Cheers,
b.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20190126/a5c38768/attachment.sig>

George Joseph

2019-Jan-28 14:29 UTC

head link

[asterisk-users] INVITE from DID: No matching endpoint found but completes the call anyway

On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 10:56 AM Brian J. Murrell <brian at
interlinx.bc.ca>
wrote:
> I have a trunk set up for the DID from my provider:
>
> [my_provider]
> type=registration
> outbound_auth=my_provider
> server_uri=sip:sip.example.com
> client_uri=sip:my_username at sip.example.com
> retry_interval=60
>
> [my_provider]
> type=auth
> auth_type=userpass
> password=123456
> username=my_username
>
> [my_provider]
> type=aor
> contact=sip:sip.example.com:5060
>
> [my_provider]
> type=endpoint
> context=from-my_provider
> disallow=all
> allow=ulaw
> outbound_auth=my_provider
> aors=my_provider
>
> [my_provider]
> type=identify
> endpoint=my_provider
> match=sip.example.com
>
> And it registers fine:
>
>  <Registration/ServerURI..............................> 
<Auth..........>
> <Status.......>
>
>
=========================================================================================>
>  mytrunk/sip:sip.example.com                             my_provider
>  Registered
>
>
> And when it gets an INVITE from my provider (192.168.0.1):
>
> <--- Received SIP request (997 bytes) from UDP:192.168.0.1:5060 --->
> INVITE sip:1235551212 at 10.75.22.5:5060 SIP/2.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK06d035fd;rport
> Max-Forwards: 70
> From: "Fred Flintstone" <sip:4565551212 at
192.168.0.1>;tag=as539f9476
> To: <sip:1235551212 at 10.75.22.5:5060>
> Contact: <sip:4565551212 at 192.168.0.1:5060>
> Call-ID: 3ef877dc4477d8ce4aae29965c5d0875 at 192.168.0.1:5060
> CSeq: 102 INVITE
> User-Agent: foobar
> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 17:40:00 GMT
> Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO,
> PUBLISH, MESSAGE
> Supported: replaces, timer
> Remote-Party-ID: "Fred Flintstone" <sip:4565551212 at
192.168.0.1
> >;party=calling;privacy=off;screen=no
> Content-Type: application/sdp
> Content-Length: 295
>
> [SDP redacted]
>
> It logs an error:
>
> [Jan 26 12:40:00] NOTICE[21775]: res_pjsip/pjsip_distributor.c:525
> log_failed_request: Request 'INVITE' from '"Fred
Flintstone" <
> sip:4565551212 at 192.168.0.1>' failed for
'192.168.0.1:5060' (callid:
> 3ef877dc4477d8ce4aae29965c5d0875 at 192.168.0.1:5060) - No matching
endpoint
> found
>
> But then goes on to complete the call:
>
> <--- Transmitting SIP response (352 bytes) to UDP:192.168.0.1:5060
--->
> SIP/2.0 100 Trying
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.1:5060
> ;rport=5060;received=192.168.0.1;branch=z9hG4bK06d035fd
> Call-ID: 3ef877dc4477d8ce4aae29965c5d0875 at 192.168.0.1:5060
> From: "Fred Flintstone" <sip:4565551212 at
192.168.0.1>;tag=as539f9476
> To: <sip:1235551212 at 10.75.22.5>
> CSeq: 102 INVITE
> Server: Asterisk PBX 13.11.1
> Content-Length:  0
>
> [ launch into dialplan ]
>
> So why the spurious error when it was able to complete the call?
>
What version of Asterisk and what's the value of the "identify_by"
parameter for the endpoint?
When you have an "identify" object configured, you should just use
"ip" as
the "identify_by",




>
> Cheers,
> b.
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> Check out the new Asterisk community forum at:
> https://community.asterisk.org/
>
> New to Asterisk? Start here:
>       https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


-- 
*George Joseph*
Digium - A Sangoma Company | Software Developer | Software Engineering
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
direct/fax: +1 256 428 6012
Check us out at: https://digium.com · https://sangoma.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20190128/24fa604b/attachment.html>

Brian J. Murrell

2019-Jan-28 15:35 UTC

head link

[asterisk-users] INVITE from DID: No matching endpoint found but completes the call anyway

On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 07:29 -0700, George Joseph wrote:> 
> What version of Asterisk
13.11.1

I know, I could stand to upgrade.
> and what's the value of the "identify_by"
> parameter for the endpoint?
It doesn't have one. I guess you are implying it should have one.
> When you have an "identify" object configured, you should just
use
> "ip" as
> the "identify_by",
I see.  OK.  Will give that a try.

Cheers,
b.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20190128/331c2095/attachment.sig>

Brian J. Murrell

2019-Jan-28 15:47 UTC

head link

[asterisk-users] INVITE from DID: No matching endpoint found but completes the call anyway

On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 07:29 -0700, George Joseph wrote:> When you have an "identify" object configured, you should just
use
> "ip" as
> the "identify_by",
But isn't ip the highest priory check in the default value of
endpoint_identifier_order and by extension, wouldn't an endpoint
without an "identify_by" implicitly be treated as
"identify_by=ip"?

So isn't my existing configuring already implicitly using
"identify_by=ip"?

Cheers,
b.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20190128/43c43bdf/attachment.sig>

asterisk users - Jan 2019 - INVITE from DID: No matching endpoint found but completes the call anyway

[asterisk-users] INVITE from DID: No matching endpoint found but completes the call anyway

[asterisk-users] INVITE from DID: No matching endpoint found but completes the call anyway

[asterisk-users] INVITE from DID: No matching endpoint found but completes the call anyway

[asterisk-users] INVITE from DID: No matching endpoint found but completes the call anyway