Hi all,
my dialplan is:
/;
======================================================================================//
//; FROM VOIP//
//;
======================================================================================//
//
//[from-voip]//
//include => default//
//
//[default]
/
/; FAXes//
//exten => _FAX_.,1,Noop("from-voip: FAX ${CALLERID(num)}
${EXTEN}")//
//exten => _FAX_.,n,Set(DID=${EXTEN:4})//
//exten => _FAX_.,n,Goto(fax-services,s,1)/
but on a call directed to, es. FAX_3700 i got:
[Nov 30 11:38:30] NOTICE[5462][C-00000027]: chan_sip.c:26309
handle_request_invite: Call from 'voip-trunk' (xxx:5060) to extension
'FAX_3700' rejected because extension not found in context
'from-voip'.
[Nov 30 11:38:30] NOTICE[5462][C-00000027]: chan_sip.c:26309
handle_request_invite: Call from 'voip-trunk' (xxx:5060) to extension
'FAX_3700' rejected because extension not found in context
'from-voip'.
Other extension like _IVR_ or _VMR_ works perfeclty and are defined in
the same manner.
Maybe _FAX was a reserved keyword ?
Michele
--
Michele Pinassi
Responsabile Telefonia di Ateneo
Servizio Reti, Sistemi e Sicurezza Informatica - Universit? degli Studi di Siena
tel: 0577.(23)5000 - centralino at unisi.it
Per trovare una soluzione rapida ai tuoi problemi tecnici consulta le FAQ di
Ateneo, http://www.faq.unisi.it
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20161130/173a6cb7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20161130/173a6cb7/attachment.pgp>
Hello, The letter "X" is reserved for dialplan patterns. You should escape it this way : _FA[X]_ Best regards Jean Aunis Le 30/11/2016 ? 11:45, Michele Pinassi a ?crit :> > Hi all, > > my dialplan is: > > /; > ======================================================================================// > //; FROM VOIP// > //; > ======================================================================================// > // > //[from-voip]// > //include => default// > // > //[default] > / > > /; FAXes// > //exten => _FAX_.,1,Noop("from-voip: FAX ${CALLERID(num)} ${EXTEN}")// > //exten => _FAX_.,n,Set(DID=${EXTEN:4})// > //exten => _FAX_.,n,Goto(fax-services,s,1)/ > > but on a call directed to, es. FAX_3700 i got: > > [Nov 30 11:38:30] NOTICE[5462][C-00000027]: chan_sip.c:26309 > handle_request_invite: Call from 'voip-trunk' (xxx:5060) to extension > 'FAX_3700' rejected because extension not found in context 'from-voip'. > [Nov 30 11:38:30] NOTICE[5462][C-00000027]: chan_sip.c:26309 > handle_request_invite: Call from 'voip-trunk' (xxx:5060) to extension > 'FAX_3700' rejected because extension not found in context 'from-voip'. > > Other extension like _IVR_ or _VMR_ works perfeclty and are defined in > the same manner. > > Maybe _FAX was a reserved keyword ? > > Michele > > -- > Michele Pinassi > Responsabile Telefonia di Ateneo > Servizio Reti, Sistemi e Sicurezza Informatica - Universit? degli Studi di Siena > tel: 0577.(23)5000 -centralino at unisi.it > > Per trovare una soluzione rapida ai tuoi problemi tecnici consulta le FAQ di Ateneo,http://www.faq.unisi.it > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20161130/9de5a676/attachment.html>
On Wednesday 30 Nov 2016, Michele Pinassi wrote:>[stuff deleted] > but on a call directed to, es. FAX_3700 i got: > > [Nov 30 11:38:30] NOTICE[5462][C-00000027]: chan_sip.c:26309 > handle_request_invite: Call from 'voip-trunk' (xxx:5060) to extension > 'FAX_3700' rejected because extension not found in context 'from-voip'. > [Nov 30 11:38:30] NOTICE[5462][C-00000027]: chan_sip.c:26309 > handle_request_invite: Call from 'voip-trunk' (xxx:5060) to extension > 'FAX_3700' rejected because extension not found in context 'from-voip'. > > Other extension like _IVR_ or _VMR_ works perfeclty and are defined in > the same manner. > > Maybe _FAX was a reserved keyword ?Almost. The letter X is a reserved *character*; it gets translated internally to [0-9]. So your extension pattern _FAX_. actually matches the pattern FA[0-9]_. and something like "FAX_3700" is not going to match this pattern (because there is now a letter X in the place where the extension pattern is expecting for there to be a digit 0-9). Try a backslash before the X? -- AJS Note: Originating address only accepts e-mail from list! If replying off- list, change address to asterisk1list at earthshod dot co dot uk .