2016-05-03 16:43 GMT+02:00 Matt Fredrickson <creslin at digium.com>:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Olivier <oza.4h07 at gmail.com>
wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm helping a colleague (*) which has the following setup:
> >
> > ITSP --- <T.38 capable PJSIP trunk> --- Asterisk 13 ---
<PJSIP>--
> > Audiocodes MP-112 --- <FXO/FXS> --- Fax machine
> >
> > My issue is the following :
> > Audiocodes gateway reject INVITEs with 488 Not Acceptable Here
> >
> > It seems this gateway requires t38 settings to be present in SDP body
in
> the
> > very first INVITE.
> >
> > My questions are the following:
> >
> > 1. I expected T.38 to exclusively work with reINVITE where calls are
> > established as normal voice calls (PCMA/PCMU in SDP, for instance) and
> then
> > upgraded to T.38 (when CNG is detected, for instance).
> > Have you ever heard of T.38 sessions being established right from the
> start
> > (ie with T.38 settings in the first INVITE) ?
>
> No. It would seem to be extremely broken if it denies a call based on
> a lack of T.38 sdp parameters on the initial INVITE.
>
OK
>
> > 2. Is it possible to configure Asterisk to pass T.38 settings in SDP
in
> the
> > first INVITE it sends ?
> >
> > 3. Any suggestion with Audiocodes gateway ?
>
> Look for T.38 settings maybe? See if there is something keeping you
> from sending an initial invite with non-T.38 SDP....?
>
Yes, I think issue must come from incorrect Audiocodes settings.
Requiring T.38 settings within first INVITE seems very unusual.
Thank you very much for replying
>
> --
> Matthew Fredrickson
> Digium, Inc. | Engineering Manager
> 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
> http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20160504/91fb4657/attachment.html>