asterisk users - Oct 2014 - [asterisk-dev] AstriDevCon 2014: Agenda item Deprecate AMI/AGI(Ben Klang)

On Oct 22, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote:
> Paul Albrecht wrote:
>> Really? Shouldn?t something this major affecting the entire Asterisk
>> community get discussed on the lists? Any idea what Leif is talking
>> about when he says the community is in transition, moving from dial
>> plan model to external control.
> 
> It was something Ben Klang brought up and wanted to talk about - it's 
> not something that has been decided 'nor does anyone know what the 
> future entails. Any further discussions will naturally occur on the 
> mailing list and in fact some things have explicit action items to bring 
> them up on here.
> 
The suggestion that Asterisk should consider deprecating AMI/AGI is ?crazy
talk.? It doesn?t merit discussion and shouldn?t be on the agenda in the first
place. It?s completely impractical and can never happen. Moreover, Leif seems to
think we (the asterisk community) are in transition. What does that mean? Are we
abandoning the dial plan? Seriously? That?s never gonna happen either. ARI isn?t
easier to use than dial plan scripting. I guess one could hope that "what
happens in Vegas stays in Vegas?, but I don?t think the Asterisk community has
that kind of luck.
> Cheers,
> 
> -- 
> Joshua Colp
> Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
> 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
> Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
> 
> -- 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> 
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Paul Albrecht <palbrecht at glccom.com>
wrote:
>
> On Oct 22, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com>
wrote:
>
> > Paul Albrecht wrote:
> >> Really? Shouldn?t something this major affecting the entire
Asterisk
> >> community get discussed on the lists? Any idea what Leif is
talking
> >> about when he says the community is in transition, moving from
dial
> >> plan model to external control.
> >
> > It was something Ben Klang brought up and wanted to talk about -
it's
> > not something that has been decided 'nor does anyone know what the
> > future entails. Any further discussions will naturally occur on the
> > mailing list and in fact some things have explicit action items to
bring
> > them up on here.
> >
>
> The suggestion that Asterisk should consider deprecating AMI/AGI is ?crazy
> talk.? It doesn?t merit discussion and shouldn?t be on the agenda in the
> first place. It?s completely impractical and can never happen. Moreover,
> Leif seems to think we (the asterisk community) are in transition. What
> does that mean? Are we abandoning the dial plan? Seriously? That?s never
> gonna happen either. ARI isn?t easier to use than dial plan scripting. I
> guess one could hope that "what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas?, but
I
> don?t think the Asterisk community has that kind of luck.
>
>
Just because someone decided to bring up a radical idea does not mean we
refuse to discuss it.

This is an open source project. Communication is done in an open,
transparent manner. People should feel like they can bring up interesting,
radical, and yes - even crazy - ideas.

If you don't like that, you don't have to participate in the discussion.

-- 
Matthew Jordan
Digium, Inc. | Engineering Manager
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: http://digium.com & http://asterisk.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20141022/d2535766/attachment.html>