emoving them from our dialplans as time allows for testing. <br /> <br /> <div id=3D"divSignature">Thanks<br /> <br /> Bryant Zimmerman (ZK Tech Inc.)<br /> 616-855-1030 Ext. 2003</div> <br /> <br /> <span style=3D"font-family: tahoma,arial,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><hr align=3D"center" size=3D"2" width=3D"100%" /> <b>From</b>: "Jonas Kellens" <jonas.kellens at telenet.be><br /> <b>Sent</b>: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 5:53 AM<br /> <b>To</b>: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com><br /> <b>Subject</b>: [asterisk-users] Macro vs sub</span><br /> <br /> <span style=3D"font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">Hello list,<br /> <br /> can I conclude that it is better to use sub's in stead of macro's ?<br /> <br /> I read the following in an Asterisk-book :<br /> <br /> GoSub() works in a different manner from Macro(), though, in that it doesn’t have the stack space requirements, so<br /> it nests effectively. Essentially, GoSub() acts like Goto() with a memory of where it came from.<br /> <br /> Is it then not better to use a method that does not stack ?!<br /> <br /> <br /> Kind regards,<br /> <br /> Jonas.<br /> </span><br /></span> ------=_NextPart_000_0001_597A3D6D.3483A974--