I read Kevin's piece in asterisk-announce about the new numbering scheme, and saw in svn-commits some tagging of 10.0.0-beta1. Perhaps I'm thick (I hope not!), but I really can't see why calling the next version 10.0.0 is any better than calling it 2.0.0! I'm surprised not to have seen ANY talk in asterisk-users or aserisk-dev about it, since the announcement. Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org
I agree, the numbering seems to make no sense. Oh well it's just an arbitrary measurement of non-progress anyway On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Tony Mountifield <tony at mountifield.org>wrote:> I read Kevin's piece in asterisk-announce about the new numbering scheme, > and saw in svn-commits some tagging of 10.0.0-beta1. > > Perhaps I'm thick (I hope not!), but I really can't see why calling the > next version 10.0.0 is any better than calling it 2.0.0! > > I'm surprised not to have seen ANY talk in asterisk-users or aserisk-dev > about it, since the announcement. > > Cheers > Tony > -- > Tony Mountifield > Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk > Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org > > -- > _____________________________________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: > http://www.asterisk.org/hello > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110722/c08c35f9/attachment.htm>
Hi Tony, On 07/22/2011 09:44 PM, Tony Mountifield wrote:> I read Kevin's piece in asterisk-announce about the new numbering scheme, > and saw in svn-commits some tagging of 10.0.0-beta1.Totally missed that one. Just did a quick browse.> Perhaps I'm thick (I hope not!), but I really can't see why calling the > next version 10.0.0 is any better than calling it 2.0.0!Don't think you are thick. There's no difference other than that 10 sounds more mature. So I'd say it's marketing L33tSp34k.> I'm surprised not to have seen ANY talk in asterisk-users or aserisk-dev > about it, since the announcement.Frankly I could not care less about version numbers. Instead I prefer stability, speedy bug fixes and new cool features. But 2.0.0 has my vote. Regards, Patrick
Since this change I started measuring temperature in Rankine. Its now 592.67 degrees here (south NJ). On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Tony Mountifield <tony at mountifield.org> wrote:> I read Kevin's piece in asterisk-announce about the new numbering scheme, > and saw in svn-commits some tagging of 10.0.0-beta1. > > Perhaps I'm thick (I hope not!), but I really can't see why calling the > next version 10.0.0 is any better than calling it 2.0.0! > > I'm surprised not to have seen ANY talk in asterisk-users or aserisk-dev > about it, since the announcement. > > Cheers > Tony > -- > Tony Mountifield > Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk > Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org > > -- > _____________________________________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? http://www.asterisk.org/hello > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > ? http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
Who really cares what the version number is. As long as the new version has
new features in it and is more stable than the old one. Please all stop
filling the mailing list with useless posts. Live with the new numbering
schema and get on with life.
Thanks
zktech
----------------------------------------
From: "Pezhman Lali" <lopl at lopl.net>
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 5:00 AM
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 10.0.0 better than 2.0.0?
I think 2.x is more better. may be 10.X is more creative, and has a binary
figure.but will not explain the true meaning
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Adam Moffett <adamlists at plexicomm.net>
wrote:
So next is version 11 and then version 100?
it has been mentioned that 10 is of course 2 ... think not in base 10
On 22 July 2011 22:26, Matthew J. Roth<mroth at imminc.com> wrote:
Kevin P. Fleming: The versions all go to ten. Look, right across the
board, ten, ten, ten and...
Asterisk Users: Oh, I see. And most open source projects upgrade to
two?
Kevin P. Fleming: Exactly.
Asterisk Users: Does that mean it's better? Is it any better?
Kevin P. Fleming: Well, it's eight better, isn't it? It's not two.
You
see, most blokes, you know, will be running at two. You're on two
here, all the way up, all the way up, all the way up, you're on two on
your software. Where can you go from there? Where?
Asterisk Users: I don't know.
Kevin P. Fleming: Nowhere. Exactly. What we do is, if we need that
extra push over the cliff, you know what we do?
Asterisk Users: Put it up to ten.
Kevin P. Fleming: Ten. Exactly. Eight better.
Asterisk Users: Why don't you just make two better and make two be the
top number and make that a little better?
Kevin P. Fleming: [pause] Asterisk goes to ten.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Matthew Roth
InterMedia Marketing Solutions
Software Engineer and Systems Developer
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
Pezhman Lali
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110727/3910adab/attachment.htm>