Hi I got the bellow error when I try to configure asterisk code. $./configure --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl ... ... ... checking for mandatory modules: OPENSSL... fail configure: *** configure: *** The OPENSSL installation appears to be missing or broken. configure: *** Either correct the installation, or run configure configure: *** including --without-ssl. I installed openssl in "/usr/local/ssl/" . Please help me to resolve this as I need to configure asterisk with SIP in TLS ,I am using 1.8 beta5 version . Or give some link where I am find how to make asterisk to work with SIP on TLS. Thanks Nikhil -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100916/4042dda0/attachment.htm
On Thursday 16 Sep 2010, Nikhil wrote:> Hi > I got the bellow error when I try to configure asterisk code. > > $./configure --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl > ... > ... > ... > checking for mandatory modules: OPENSSL... fail > > configure: *** > configure: *** The OPENSSL installation appears to be missing or broken. > configure: *** Either correct the installation, or run configure > configure: *** including --without-ssl. > > I installed openssl in "/usr/local/ssl/" . > > Please help me to resolve this as I need to configure asterisk with SIP > in TLS ,I am using 1.8 beta5 version . Or give some link where I am > find how to make asterisk to work with SIP on TLS.Did you remember to run ldconfig after installing ssl? What OS are you running? If some kind of Linux, why not just install the openssl and openssl-devel packages? -- AJS
On 09/16/2010 04:11 PM, A J Stiles wrote:> On Thursday 16 Sep 2010, Nikhil wrote: >> Hi >> I got the bellow error when I try to configure asterisk code. >>>> $./configure --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl >> ... >> ... >> ... >> checking for mandatory modules: OPENSSL... fail >> >> configure: *** >> configure: *** The OPENSSL installation appears to be missing or broken. >> configure: *** Either correct the installation, or run configure >> configure: *** including --without-ssl. >> >> I installed openssl in "/usr/local/ssl/" . >> >> Please help me to resolve this as I need to configure asterisk with SIP >> in TLS ,I am using 1.8 beta5 version . Or give some link where I am >> find how to make asterisk to work with SIP on TLS. > Did you remember to run ldconfig after installing ssl? > > What OS are you running? If some kind of Linux, why not just install the > openssl and openssl-devel packages? >I am using centOS-5 and I installed the ssl from source code(openssl-0.9.8k),but I think that is not the problem..Did anyone face the same type of error when doing configure the asterisk code?if yes how u solved that problem.?please help me on this. Thanks Nikhil
Its working now when I installed openssl using yum. yum install -y openssl-devel. Thanks Nikhil On 09/16/2010 05:26 PM, Nikhil wrote:> On 09/16/2010 04:11 PM, A J Stiles wrote: >> On Thursday 16 Sep 2010, Nikhil wrote: >>> Hi >>> I got the bellow error when I try to configure asterisk code. >>> > >>> $./configure --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl >>> ... >>> ... >>> ... >>> checking for mandatory modules: OPENSSL... fail >>> >>> configure: *** >>> configure: *** The OPENSSL installation appears to be missing or broken. >>> configure: *** Either correct the installation, or run configure >>> configure: *** including --without-ssl. >>> >>> I installed openssl in "/usr/local/ssl/" . >>> >>> Please help me to resolve this as I need to configure asterisk with SIP >>> in TLS ,I am using 1.8 beta5 version . Or give some link where I am >>> find how to make asterisk to work with SIP on TLS. >> Did you remember to run ldconfig after installing ssl? >> >> What OS are you running? If some kind of Linux, why not just install the >> openssl and openssl-devel packages? >> > I am using centOS-5 and I installed the ssl from source > code(openssl-0.9.8k),but I think that is not the problem..Did anyone > face the same type of error when doing configure the asterisk code?if > yes how u solved that problem.?please help me on this. > > Thanks > Nikhil > >