Olivier
2010-Apr-06 08:16 UTC
[asterisk-users] Which rule for Asterisk to Asterisk-addons compatibility ?
Hello, In asterisk-addons-1.6.1.2's changelog, you can see that 6 changes were committed between versions 1.6.1.1 and 1.6.1.2. But if I'm not mistaken, you cannot read anything there about Asterisk to Asterisk-addons compatibility. What is the rule for Asterisk to Asterisk-addons compatibility ? Is this rule implicit ("any Asterisk-addons 1.6.1.X is compatible with any Asterisk 1.6.1.Y") or did I miss something ? Regards. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100406/8f644f07/attachment.htm
Tilghman Lesher
2010-Apr-06 15:18 UTC
[asterisk-users] Which rule for Asterisk to Asterisk-addons compatibility ?
On Tuesday 06 April 2010 03:16:45 Olivier wrote:> In asterisk-addons-1.6.1.2's changelog, you can see that 6 changes were > committed between versions 1.6.1.1 and 1.6.1.2. > But if I'm not mistaken, you cannot read anything there about Asterisk to > Asterisk-addons compatibility. > > What is the rule for Asterisk to Asterisk-addons compatibility ? > Is this rule implicit ("any Asterisk-addons 1.6.1.X is compatible with any > Asterisk 1.6.1.Y") or did I miss something ?That should be completely correct, unless a security fix requires an API change. I don't think we've ever had that situation, so we've never had to address how we would label the difference. -- Tilghman Lesher Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer twitter: Corydon76 | IRC: Corydon76-dig (Freenode) Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org