sean darcy
2009-Sep-22 01:26 UTC
[asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?
In my attempts to set up digium fax I get an odd warning: -- Executing [s at Capture-Fax:2] ReceiveFAX("SIP/173-b53023e8", "/var/spool/asterisk/fax/20090921_1806.tif") in new stack -- Channel 'SIP/173-b53023e8' receiving fax '/var/spool/asterisk/fax/20090921_1806.tif' [Sep 21 18:06:37] WARNING[5149]: chan_sip.c:5561 sip_indicate: Don't know how to indicate condition 19 -- Channel 'SIP/173-b53023e8' fax session '7' started Is there some list of these conditions? Should I care? sean
David Backeberg
2009-Sep-22 02:42 UTC
[asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:26 PM, sean darcy <seandarcy2 at gmail.com> wrote:> In my attempts to set up digium fax I get an odd warning: > > ? ? -- Executing [s at Capture-Fax:2] ReceiveFAX("SIP/173-b53023e8", > "/var/spool/asterisk/fax/20090921_1806.tif") in new stack > ? ? -- Channel 'SIP/173-b53023e8' receiving fax > '/var/spool/asterisk/fax/20090921_1806.tif' > [Sep 21 18:06:37] WARNING[5149]: chan_sip.c:5561 sip_indicate: Don't > know how to indicate condition 19 > ? ? -- Channel 'SIP/173-b53023e8' fax session '7' started > > Is there some list of these conditions? Should I care?I get a lot of fax messages that seem extraneous so I usually ignore them. There is already an open ticket want an SVN fix for one that I found particularly annoying. I'm talking about one that repeatedly talks about a missing segment or something like that, and it happens a gazillion times per fax. A gazillion being "way more than I want it to". Did the fax come through okay? If yes I recommend ignoring the error unless you want to be particularly diligent and dig through the bug tracker to see if it's already been fixed.