This is what you show CBeyond. You have some vouchers there from CBeyond
that will allow me to get paid from them not you.
Chuck Coleman
President CCI Technologies/CC Call Center/CSI Technologies
Director of Managed Services for Gurus2go
Cell 510-439-6501
Confidential Email: This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
whom they are addressed.? Please notify the sender immediately by email if
you have received this email by mistake and delete this email from your
system. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that
disclosing, copying, distributing, or taking any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited.? Please also note that
any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of the CSI Technologies, Inc..?
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:00
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: asterisk-users Digest, Vol 56, Issue 23
Send asterisk-users mailing list submissions to
asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
asterisk-users-owner at lists.digium.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of asterisk-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: problem with an agi in PHP (BERGANZ Fran?ois)
2. Re: Making use of SIP "making progress" messages
(Olle E. Johansson)
3. Re: Faxing success rate on PRI (Marco Signorini)
4. Re: Faxing success rate on PRI (Doug Lytle)
5. Re: Faxing success rate on PRI (Lee Howard)
6. Re: Faxing success rate on PRI (Steve Underwood)
7. Re: Bounty- CDR Bug Fix (Tilghman Lesher)
8. Re: problem with an agi in PHP (Steve Edwards)
9. Re: Faxing success rate on PRI (Marco Signorini)
10. Re: colorized logfiles in asterisk 1.6.0.6 (Tilghman Lesher)
11. How to install spandsp from source in lenny ? (Olivier)
12. Re: Cdr problem (Tilghman Lesher)
13. Re: Broken Pipe error while using UpdateConfig command
(Tilghman Lesher)
14. Re: Faxing success rate on PRI (Marco Signorini)
15. Re: How to install spandsp from source in lenny ?
(James Sneeringer)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:29:04 +0100
From: BERGANZ Fran?ois <francois at acropolistelecom.net>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] problem with an agi in PHP
To: "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion'"
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Message-ID: <006601c9a0c3$66331360$32993a20$@net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I am sorry it work !
In fact, I had mistakes in my config?
Sorry
And thank you for answering?
Cordialement,
BERGANZ Fran?ois
P Pensez ? l'Environnement, n'imprimez ce mail que si n?cessaire.
De : asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] De la part de Danny
Nicholas
Envoy? : lundi 9 mars 2009 15:07
? : 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] problem with an agi in PHP
You didn?t say whether a2billing.php works from the shell. Is it 755
permissioned?
_____
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of BERGANZ
Fran?ois
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 8:53 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] problem with an agi in PHP
I have the same thing with AGI in the dialplan
And php is install
Cordialement,
BERGANZ Fran?ois
P Pensez ? l'Environnement, n'imprimez ce mail que si n?cessaire.
De : asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] De la part de Danny
Nicholas
Envoy? : lundi 9 mars 2009 14:36
? : 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] problem with an agi in PHP
The message ?indicates? that DEADAGI will not work and that you should use
AGI instead. Are you sure PHP is installed on your machine and functioning
properly (from $, php a2billing.php works)?
_____
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of BERGANZ
Fran?ois
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 8:30 AM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] problem with an agi in PHP
Hello,
I need to execute an agi in php.
I have that:
== Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5
-- Executing [0170725000 at mnupprx1:1]
Answer("SIP/33179977999-b6c18478",
"") in new stack
-- Executing [0170725000 at mnupprx1:2]
GotoIf("SIP/33179977999-b6c18478",
"0?6:3)") in new stack
-- Goto (mnupprx1,0170725000,3)
-- Executing [0170725000 at mnupprx1:3]
DeadAGI("SIP/33179977999-b6c18478",
"a2billing.php") in new stack
[Mar 9 14:25:08] WARNING[7518]: res_agi.c:3064 deadagi_exec: DeadAGI has
been deprecated, please use AGI in all cases!
-- Launched AGI Script /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/a2billing.php
-- <SIP/33179977999-b6c18478>AGI Script a2billing.php completed,
returning 0
-- Executing [0170725000 at mnupprx1:4]
Wait("SIP/33179977999-b6c18478",
"2") in new stack
-- Executing [0170725000 at mnupprx1:5]
Hangup("SIP/33179977999-b6c18478",
"") in new stack
== Spawn extension (mnupprx1, 0170725000, 5) exited non-zero on
'SIP/33179977999-b6c18478'
I dont know why it dont exec it !
Cordialement,
BERGANZ Fran?ois
P Pensez ? l'Environnement, n'imprimez ce mail que si n?cessaire.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090309/ec2f45
e6/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:08:08 +0100
From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej at edvina.net>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Making use of SIP "making progress"
messages
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Message-ID: <F502050C-1C22-41AC-8908-3701D79A4EF3 at edvina.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
6 mar 2009 kl. 13.36 skrev Mikel Lindsaar:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there any way to make use of the SIP making progress messages?
>
> I find that about the time the SIP peer says "making progress" is
the
> time the other end actually starts to ring, or is busy etc.
>
> Before that time, I want to generate an "in progress" tone using
> playtones to let the user know that their call is doing something.
>
> I need to be able to call stop tones once the in progress call is
> received.
>
> Any ideas?
show application playback
Check the "noanswer" option
/O :-)
------
Check our new SIP router class: http://edvina.net
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:13:17 +0100
From: Marco Signorini <marcotasto at libero.it>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing success rate on PRI
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Message-ID: <49B5320D.7080902 at libero.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi Gordon, thank you for your answer.
It's not mandatory to use an external box to handle the PRI. I was
thinking to use a Patton device instead of a TE120P just because I would
like to be able to switch to T38 in the near future or if working with
inband faxes will reveal problems.
I'm open to any suggestion, being in the initial requirements analysis
stage.
External devices, also, let me able to select a server independently by
the PCI, PCIXpress or any other connectors will be ready in the future,
maximizing the customer investment... but this could be the less
interesting part.
Thank you to All People answered me on this subject.
Analyzing your answers, seems that fax handling is still today
problematic with IAXModem and Hylafax... or I'm wrong?
What about other solutions?
Thank you and best regards,
Marco Signorini
======================INGEGNI Tech S.r.l.
http://www.ingegnitech.com
Gordon Henderson wrote:> On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, Marco wrote:
>
>
>> Hi List,
>> I've been using PSTN-ATA + Asterisk + IAXModem + Hylafax since
three
years>> on my lab test setup and I appreciate it. Moreover the global quantity
of
>> fax handled by this setup is not very high.
>>
>> I'll be involved in a more complex system for a customer and I
would like
>> to ask to All of you if you have experiences and/or statistical results
on>> faxing success and failure rate.
>>
>> The system I have to deploy will operate in the following context:
>>
>> - It will be interfaced to an E1 PRI
>> - It will be able to send and receive faxes (by e-mail and/or virtual
>> printers)
>> - It will be able to send faxes from a normal fax machine.
>>
>> The system will be placed on the same building, i.e. only private
ethernet>> trunks.
>>
>> I'm thinking to this type of solution:
>> - Patton external unit for E1
>>
>
> Out of curiosity, why an external box rather than something like a TE120P
> PCI card?
>
>
>
>> - Asterisk 1.4 + IAXModem + Hylafax
>> - An external ATA for the fax machine
>> but I'm open to any other possible solution (I'm thinking to
have a
>> demodulation on Patton and talk T38 with Asterisk 1.6).
>>
>
> Personally, I think you're adding complexity and can't see why that
would
> be better than an on-board PRI card...
>
> Gordon
>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:28:58 -0400
From: Doug Lytle <support at drdos.info>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing success rate on PRI
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Message-ID: <49B535BA.5060007 at drdos.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Marco Signorini wrote:> Analyzing your answers, seems that fax handling is still today
> problematic with IAXModem and Hylafax... or I'm wrong?
>
I would strongly disagree with this statement.
I'm running 3 systems. All 3 are PRI/iaxmodem/HylaFAX+. I may see a
failure maybe once every other month. Usually it's because the end user
has cancelled.
We average around 180 faxes a day
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 08:49:23 -0700
From: Lee Howard <faxguy at howardsilvan.com>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing success rate on PRI
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Message-ID: <49B53A83.904 at howardsilvan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Marco Signorini wrote:> Analyzing your answers, seems that fax handling is still today
> problematic with IAXModem and Hylafax... or I'm wrong?
A single server that I administer, receiving 12,000 pages and sending
1,000 pages daily would seem to contradict your conclusions.
Thanks,
Lee.
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:57:44 +0800
From: Steve Underwood <steveu at coppice.org>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing success rate on PRI
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Message-ID: <49B53C78.90500 at coppice.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Marco Signorini wrote:> Hi Gordon, thank you for your answer.
>
> It's not mandatory to use an external box to handle the PRI. I was
> thinking to use a Patton device instead of a TE120P just because I would
> like to be able to switch to T38 in the near future or if working with
> inband faxes will reveal problems.
> I'm open to any suggestion, being in the initial requirements analysis
> stage.
>
> External devices, also, let me able to select a server independently by
> the PCI, PCIXpress or any other connectors will be ready in the future,
> maximizing the customer investment... but this could be the less
> interesting part.
>
> Thank you to All People answered me on this subject.
> Analyzing your answers, seems that fax handling is still today
> problematic with IAXModem and Hylafax... or I'm wrong?
> What about other solutions?
>
I'm not sure where you got that idea. Most comments about iaxmodem +
HylaFAX are very positive. It does, of course, require a reliable
connection between iaxmodem and the PSTN, but most people set these
things up in a reasonably well controlled environment. There are some
notes at http://www.soft-switch.org/spandsp-soft-fax-performance.html
about the results of serious real world volume testing of iaxmodem.
Regards,
Steve
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:00:46 -0500
From: Tilghman Lesher <tilghman at mail.jeffandtilghman.com>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Bounty- CDR Bug Fix
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Message-ID: <200903091100.46627.tilghman at mail.jeffandtilghman.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Friday 06 March 2009 06:26:13 am Robert Broyles
wrote:> Great backports! :-)
>
> This should really be merged into 1.4.
This would violate the release policy for 1.4.
--
Tilghman
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Steve Edwards <asterisk.org at sedwards.com>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] problem with an agi in PHP
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0903090904310.21491 at fs.sedwards.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="x-unknown"
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Danny Nicholas wrote:
> The message ?indicates? that DEADAGI will not work and that you should use
> AGI instead.
