Karl Fife
2008-Aug-30 16:51 UTC
[asterisk-users] Wi-SIP & 802.11f - Inter Access Point Protocol HANDOFF
Has anyone ever really, truly, actually held on to a Wi-SIP call while moving from the range of one AP to the range of another AP in the same network? Let's say a 'YES' only counts if you had a bona-fide handoff. In other words, you began in place 'A' (within range of AP#1 but OUTSIDE the range of AP#2), AND THEN MOVED to place 'B' (in range of AP#2, but completely outside the range of AP#1) WITYOUT dropping the call. Supposedly it's possible with compliant hardware using 802.11f - Inter-Access Point Protocol (IAPP), but given how ALL standards ALWAYS work together PERFECTLY, 100% of the time :-), I'm guessing that it doesn't work. Can anyone speak to this from experience? -Karl
Michael Graves
2008-Aug-30 17:08 UTC
[asterisk-users] Wi-SIP & 802.11f - Inter Access Point Protocol HANDOFF
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:51:49 -0500, Karl Fife wrote:>Has anyone ever really, truly, actually held on to a Wi-SIP call while >moving from the range of one AP to the range of another AP in the same >network? > >Let's say a 'YES' only counts if you had a bona-fide handoff. In other >words, you began in place 'A' (within range of AP#1 but OUTSIDE the >range of AP#2), AND THEN MOVED to place 'B' (in range of AP#2, but >completely outside the range of AP#1) WITYOUT dropping the call. > >Supposedly it's possible with compliant hardware using 802.11f - >Inter-Access Point Protocol (IAPP), but given how ALL standards ALWAYS >work together PERFECTLY, 100% of the time :-), I'm guessing that it >doesn't work. Can anyone speak to this from experience? > >-KarlKarl, I'm guessing that it was not common. 802.11f handoffs reportedly take 100ms which is considered too long for streaming applications like voice and video. The 802.11r standard was only agreed upon and released days ago. This specifies FAST BSS transition specifically to saisfy such applications. Not sure if any hardware supports this as yet. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11r Michael -- Michael Graves mgraves<at>mstvp.com http://blog.mgraves.org o713-861-4005 c713-201-1262 sip:mjgraves at pixelpower.onsip.com skype mjgraves fwd 54245
Anthony Messina
2008-Aug-30 17:14 UTC
[asterisk-users] Wi-SIP & 802.11f - Inter Access Point Protocol HANDOFF
On Saturday 30 August 2008 11:51:49 am Karl Fife wrote:> Let's say a 'YES' only counts if you had a bona-fide handoff. ?In other > words, you began in place 'A' (within range of AP#1 but OUTSIDE the > range of AP#2), AND THEN MOVED to place 'B' (in range of AP#2, but > completely outside the range of AP#1) WITYOUT dropping the call. ?wouldn't the ap ranges have to have *some* overlap, lest the basic network connection be dropped, whereby dropping the voip call? -- Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080830/0e92ddb2/attachment.pgp