Hello, I just got my Xorcom BRI bank. Seems to work. But I have some questions. Is anyone getting good values using zttest? Here is what I get: root at ldidelot:~# zttest -v Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.376 system clock sample intervals (99.992%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8190.040 system clock sample intervals (99.976%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.136 system clock sample intervals (99.989%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.248 system clock sample intervals (99.991%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.120 system clock sample intervals (99.989%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.185 system clock sample intervals (99.990%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.231 system clock sample intervals (99.991%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.177 system clock sample intervals (99.990%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.128 system clock sample intervals (99.989%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.232 system clock sample intervals (99.991%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.279 system clock sample intervals (99.991%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.216 system clock sample intervals (99.990%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.192 system clock sample intervals (99.990%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.112 system clock sample intervals (99.989%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.192 system clock sample intervals (99.990%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.208 system clock sample intervals (99.990%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8190.536 system clock sample intervals (99.982%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.200 system clock sample intervals (99.990%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.248 system clock sample intervals (99.991%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.224 system clock sample intervals (99.991%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.151 system clock sample intervals (99.990%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.151 system clock sample intervals (99.990%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.200 system clock sample intervals (99.990%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.160 system clock sample intervals (99.990%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.152 system clock sample intervals (99.990%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.184 system clock sample intervals (99.990%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.256 system clock sample intervals (99.991%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.192 system clock sample intervals (99.990%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.231 system clock sample intervals (99.991%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8192.145 system clock sample intervals (100.002%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.169 system clock sample intervals (99.990%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.128 system clock sample intervals (99.989%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.353 system clock sample intervals (99.992%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8190.960 system clock sample intervals (99.987%) 8192 zaptel samples in 8191.208 system clock sample intervals (99.990%) --- Results after 35 passes --- Best: 99.998 -- Worst: 99.976 -- Average: 99.989757, Difference: 99.98985 -- Lo?c DIDELOT MIXvoip S.a. ldidelot at mixvoip.com http://www.mixvoip.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Loic Didelot wrote:> Hello, > I just got my Xorcom BRI bank. Seems to work. But I have some questions. > Is anyone getting good values using zttest?Is it plugged into the BRI? Is it the sync master? i.e. xpp_sync - -- Kind Regards, Matt Riddell Director _______________________________________________ http://www.venturevoip.com (Great new VoIP end to end solution) http://www.venturevoip.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html) http://www.venturevoip.com/newrssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIfVZ4DQNt8rg0Kp4RAt0hAJ4029j/sh/HG5bcktRFCzYTs5y8HgCdGvLx ehhwenzbGTA9Vr/n2rYNTvE=InwQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hello, yes it is plugged in and working (just not very good for now) and it is the MASTER. Loic On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 14:01 +1200, Matt Riddell wrote:> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Loic Didelot wrote: > > Hello, > > I just got my Xorcom BRI bank. Seems to work. But I have some questions. > > Is anyone getting good values using zttest? > > Is it plugged into the BRI? > > Is it the sync master? > > i.e. xpp_sync > > - -- > Kind Regards, > > Matt Riddell > Director > _______________________________________________ > > http://www.venturevoip.com (Great new VoIP end to end solution) > http://www.venturevoip.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html) > http://www.venturevoip.com/newrssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss) > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFIfVZ4DQNt8rg0Kp4RAt0hAJ4029j/sh/HG5bcktRFCzYTs5y8HgCdGvLx > ehhwenzbGTA9Vr/n2rYNTvE> =InwQ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona > Register Now: http://www.astricon.net > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- Lo?c DIDELOT MIXvoip S.a. ldidelot at mixvoip.com http://www.mixvoip.com
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:27:00AM +0200, Loic Didelot wrote:> Hello, > yes it is plugged in and working (just not very good for now) and it is > the MASTER.Is the zaptel sync master a different span from a different Astribank on the same system? All Astribanks should have synchronized clock. So if the master happens to be a different Astribank on the same system, its clock should still be in sync with the clock of the BRI Astribank (which should be taken from the clock of your BRI provider). -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com +972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com http://www.xorcom.com iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir