Zeeshan Zakaria
2008-Jun-05 22:01 UTC
[asterisk-users] Similar extension numbers for multiple users
Hi everybody, Is it possible to create similar extension numbers for multiple users. I am looking at a case of virtual PBX with 5 tenants on one server. Any applicable ideas or suggestions would be highly appreciated. -- Zeeshan A Zakaria -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080605/1b1b9ae1/attachment.htm
Carlos Chavez
2008-Jun-05 22:10 UTC
[asterisk-users] Similar extension numbers for multiple users
As long as each tenant has its own context you can use the same numbering plan. The only thing you need to keep unique are the names for the SIP devices. If you want your tenants to be able to call each other then you would need to set up a special prefix for each tenant. On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 18:01 -0400, Zeeshan Zakaria wrote:> Hi everybody, > > Is it possible to create similar extension numbers for multiple users. > I am looking at a case of virtual PBX with 5 tenants on one server. > Any applicable ideas or suggestions would be highly appreciated. > > -- > Zeeshan A Zakaria > _______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- ?Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de M?xico S.A. de C.V. Carlos Ch?vez Prats Director de Tecnolog?a +52-55-91169161 ext 2001 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080605/e7cde9e9/attachment.pgp
Joe Carroll
2008-Jun-05 22:53 UTC
[asterisk-users] Similar extension numbers for multiple users
Would it be possible to have a context with includes for each tenant and include that context in the specific tenant contexts that you would have calling each other.....if that makes any sense whatsoever.. ________________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Carlos Chavez [cursor at telecomabmex.com] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 5:10 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Similar extension numbers for multiple users As long as each tenant has its own context you can use the same numbering plan. The only thing you need to keep unique are the names for the SIP devices. If you want your tenants to be able to call each other then you would need to set up a special prefix for each tenant. On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 18:01 -0400, Zeeshan Zakaria wrote:> Hi everybody, > > Is it possible to create similar extension numbers for multiple users. > I am looking at a case of virtual PBX with 5 tenants on one server. > Any applicable ideas or suggestions would be highly appreciated. > > -- > Zeeshan A Zakaria > _______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- ?Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de M?xico S.A. de C.V. Carlos Ch?vez Prats Director de Tecnolog?a +52-55-91169161 ext 2001
Zeeshan Zakaria
2008-Jun-06 00:34 UTC
[asterisk-users] Similar extension numbers for multiple users
Currently my devices are set as follows: Devices ----------- [100] type=friend secret=42335432 qualify=yes port=5060 host=dynamic dial=SIP/100 context=user1 canreinvite=no accountcode=user1 I guess I can change it to 100a, 100b and so on for different users. But I would need help with a sample context for how to make them dial out and each other. -- Zeeshan A Zakaria -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080605/680da46b/attachment.htm