Hello, We are thinking in use asterisk-java to an billing solution, wich is the better choice, and if someone could give us a understandable description about the difference between DeadAGI and FastAGI, i found a very interesting project called asterisk2billing and they use DeadAGI, anyway wich one scale better? And there is a tool for test performance? Thanks, Roberto -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080506/cc5f1072/attachment.htm
Google is awesome http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+AGI -- Matt From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of chetherston miles Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 10:20 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Performance issues Hello, We are thinking in use asterisk-java to an billing solution, wich is the better choice, and if someone could give us a understandable description about the difference between DeadAGI and FastAGI, i found a very interesting project called asterisk2billing and they use DeadAGI, anyway wich one scale better? And there is a tool for test performance? Thanks, Roberto -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080506/bcc943b5/attachment.htm
I'm not an expert, but FastAGI you use in a live channel over TCP connection ... Most people agree it is better because doesn't spawn a new process every time it is called ... but they also suggest to do not use in the same server ... DeadAGI you cannot use it in a live channel ... By the way, a2billing is a nice software ... Areski does a great job ... I neither use it a lot nor in a production high volume environment but I liked it ... ----- Original Message ----- Subject: [asterisk-users] Performance issues From: "chetherston miles" >;miles.chet at gmail.com> Date: Tue, May 6, 2008 10:20 Hello, We are thinking in use asterisk-java to an billing solution, wich is the better choice, and if someone could give us a understandable description about the difference between DeadAGI and FastAGI, i found a very interesting project called asterisk2billing and they use DeadAGI, anyway wich one scale better? And there is a tool for test performance? Thanks, Roberto _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080506/9c83d4d9/attachment.htm
Udo Schacht-Wiegand
2008-Jul-09 23:45 UTC
[asterisk-users] fxotune: Unable to set impedance
Hi, we have a strong echo on an Astribank running on Asterisk 1.2.29-BRIstuffed-0.3.0-PRE-1y-s The echo is on the opposite site of the analogue phones connected to the Astribank. I tried to use fxotune. It is a production system, so I cannot shutdown Asterisk for long, I did: CLI> zap destroy channel 120 and then: # fxotune -vvv -i -b 120 -e 120 Tuning module /dev/zap/120 Unable to set impedance on fd 4 Failure! Unable to tune 1 devices, even though those devices are present What can I do to use fxotune? Udo