asterisk users - Mar 2008 - Microsoft Office Communications Server

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Has anyone done any integration with this?

All I know so far is that it appears to use some non standard form of SIP.

Any pointers?

- --
Kind Regards,

Matt Riddell
Director
_______________________________________________

http://www.venturevoip.com (Great new VoIP end to end solution)
http://www.venturevoip.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://www.venturevoip.com/newrssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH1KVoDQNt8rg0Kp4RAgSfAJ0aXGIkKi6kGAjZK8TtSV2mMj79qQCdHhAS
1jZ9sjtsTJ3O1R9J3giztw8=Mlnt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

>
> Has anyone done any integration with this?
>
> All I know so far is that it appears to use some non standard form of
> SIP.
>
> Any pointers?
>
<sarcasm>
What!? Microsoft implementing something not compliant with official
standards. Your kidding?
</sarcasm>

Sorry Matt, no advice here but I just couldn't resist.
--
David Cook

They very likely purchased or licensed an engine from someone.  Use
Wireshark and compare it to other SIP proxies/servers/gateways.


On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Matt Riddell <matt at venturevoip.com>
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>  Hash: SHA1
>
>  Has anyone done any integration with this?
>
>  All I know so far is that it appears to use some non standard form of SIP.
>
>  Any pointers?
>
>  - --
>  Kind Regards,
>
>  Matt Riddell
>  Director
>  _______________________________________________
>
>  http://www.venturevoip.com (Great new VoIP end to end solution)
>  http://www.venturevoip.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
>  http://www.venturevoip.com/newrssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
>  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>  Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
>  Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
>  iD8DBQFH1KVoDQNt8rg0Kp4RAgSfAJ0aXGIkKi6kGAjZK8TtSV2mMj79qQCdHhAS
>  1jZ9sjtsTJ3O1R9J3giztw8>  =Mlnt
>  -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
>  asterisk-users mailing list
>  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>


-- 
/*
 Andrew Latham
 LATHAMA (lay-th-ham-eh)
 lathama at lathama.com
 lathama at gmail.com

 TuxTone Inc.
 http://www.TuxTone.com
*/

On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Matt Riddell <matt at venturevoip.com>
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>  Hash: SHA1
>
>  Has anyone done any integration with this?
>
>  All I know so far is that it appears to use some non standard form of SIP.
>
>  Any pointers?
>
>  - --
>  Kind Regards,
>
>  Matt Riddell
>  Director
Matt,

  I believe OCS only supports SIP over TCP.  You'll either need to use
Asterisk 1.6/trunk with SIP TCP or install SER/OpenSER as a UDP-TCP
proxy.

-- 
Kristian Kielhofner

What is the logic of them using SIP over TCP? Is this a broad industry
trend? Or just the latest attempt to get around SIP/NAT issues?

Michael Graves
mgraves <at> mstvp.com
o(713) 861-4005
c(713) 201-1262
sip:mjgraves at pixelpower.onsip.com
skype mjgraves
FWD 54245

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Microsoft Office Communications Server
> From: "Kristian Kielhofner" <kristian.kielhofner at
gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, March 10, 2008 5:18 pm
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Matt Riddell <matt at
venturevoip.com> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >  Hash: SHA1
> >
> >  Has anyone done any integration with this?
> >
> >  All I know so far is that it appears to use some non standard form of
SIP.
> >
> >  Any pointers?
> >
> >  - --
> >  Kind Regards,
> >
> >  Matt Riddell
> >  Director
> Matt,
>   I believe OCS only supports SIP over TCP.  You'll either need to use
> Asterisk 1.6/trunk with SIP TCP or install SER/OpenSER as a UDP-TCP
> proxy.
> -- 
> Kristian Kielhofner
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

I would rather stick needles in my eyes but that's just me.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Riddell [mailto:matt at venturevoip.com] 
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 8:05 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Microsoft Office Communications Server

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Has anyone done any integration with this?

All I know so far is that it appears to use some non standard form of SIP.

Any pointers?

- --
Kind Regards,

Matt Riddell
Director
_______________________________________________

http://www.venturevoip.com (Great new VoIP end to end solution)
http://www.venturevoip.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://www.venturevoip.com/newrssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH1KVoDQNt8rg0Kp4RAgSfAJ0aXGIkKi6kGAjZK8TtSV2mMj79qQCdHhAS
1jZ9sjtsTJ3O1R9J3giztw8=Mlnt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Razza wrote:
>     Imagine, repairing an engine of your brand new car you just bought?
>     Imagine "restarting" your TV because it just froze?  What if
your shoes
>     have "just" changed colour to "blue screen"?
>     It will just not "pass", will it? ... You will DEMAND a
service for your
>     car/TV,shoes or you may return it or whatever.
> 
>     So.. Imagine how much your business will be affected with a phone
SYSTEM
>     based on a such operating system, one which can not even meet basic
>     desktop user requirements let alone crucial every day in/out business
>     communications tool like a phone system.
> 
>     At the end, if you do not answer a call some else will!!!
> 
> 
>     Senad Jordanovic
>     www.bicomsystems.com <http://www.bicomsystems.com>
> 
> What utter stereotypical dross.
I would suggest to you learning how to use text emails and quoting first 
then you may have some responses that may be your worth while.


Senad

On 11/03/2008, Senad Jordanovic <senad at bicom.us>
wrote:
>
> I would suggest to you learning how to use text emails and quoting first
> then you may have some responses that may be your worth while.
>
Clearly, you keep responding!
Oh and move out of the dark ages and get a decent mail reader.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080311/435b577f/attachment.htm

Razza wrote:
> On 11/03/2008, *Senad Jordanovic* <senad at bicom.us 
> <mailto:senad at bicom.us>> wrote:
> 
>     I would suggest to you learning how to use text emails and quoting
first
>     then you may have some responses that may be your worth while.
> 
> Clearly, you keep responding!
> Oh and move out of the dark ages and get a decent mail reader.
>  
there is a say...

"never start a silly fight first, but always make sure you finish it"

Guess, which one are you?



Senad

On 10/03/2008, Matt Riddell <matt at venturevoip.com>
wrote:
>
> Has anyone done any integration with this?
>
> All I know so far is that it appears to use some non standard form of SIP.
>
> Any pointers?
>
If you are looking to use "Enterprise Voice" (voice breakout between
the OCS
and PBX environment) as opposed to setting up "Remote Call Control".
It
might be simpler to employ a seperate MS supported SIP-E1/T1 gateway, and
fitting an E1/T1 card to the PBX(s).
This would also give a good demarcation point.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080311/934c9b38/attachment.htm

We are interested in getting something working also, let me know how it
goes.  We are currently using LCS 2005 for IM, the only thing we want to add
is the ability to update the "On the Phone" status in communicator.  I
have
a test system on 1.6, but so far have been unable to update the presence
information, would be interested if anyone has been able to do it will
Office communications server.


On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Razza <razza30 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/03/2008, Matt Riddell <matt at venturevoip.com> wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone done any integration with this?
> >
> > All I know so far is that it appears to use some non standard form of
> > SIP.
> >
> > Any pointers?
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080311/74842735/attachment.htm

On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 16:05 +1300, Matt Riddell wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Has anyone done any integration with this?
> 
> All I know so far is that it appears to use some non standard form of SIP.
> 
> Any pointers?

afaik, one of my colleages has done something with it.
Instead of asterisk-1.4 plus (open)ser i convinced him in trying just
asterisk-1.6. needed just one additional parameter: use tcp. That's all.


Want any specific details?
I'll ask when i see him again...


hw