Tomasz Zieleniewski
2008-Jan-04 09:58 UTC
[asterisk-users] Unable to forward call on SIP channel after SIP response 302 Moved Temporarily
Hi, I have the following problem that when asterisk receives SIP response 302 it cannot forward the call I get such debug: [Jan 4 10:43:27] WARNING[18671]: channel.c:3281 ast_request: No channel type registered for 'Local' [Jan 4 10:43:27] NOTICE[18671]: app_dial.c:505 wait_for_answer: Unable to create local channel for call forward to 'Local/poczta at routing-sip' (cause 66) What could be the reason for this? Thank You in advance bests -tomasz <--- SIP read from 192.168.0.165:7060 ---> SIP/2.0 302 Moved Temporarily Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7070;branch=z9hG4bK274b7d50;rport=7070 Contact: <sip:poczta at voip.rd.touk.pl:7170> To: <sip:hellboy at voip.rd.touk.pl:7060>;tag=12711d6c From: "IPFon"<sip:0225761853 at 192.168.0.165:7070>;tag=as66773d49 Call-ID: 08027b6d45abc7a00c2c6a8630d2de47 at 192.168.0.165 CSeq: 102 INVITE User-Agent: X-Lite release 1011s stamp 41150 Content-Length: 0 <-------------> [Jan 4 10:43:27] --- (9 headers 0 lines) --- [Jan 4 10:43:27] -- Got SIP response 302 "Moved Temporarily" back from 192.168.0.165 [Jan 4 10:43:27] Transmitting (no NAT) to 192.168.0.165:7060: ACK sip:hellboy at voip.rd.touk.pl:7060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7070;branch=z9hG4bK274b7d50;rport From: "IPFon" <sip:0225761853 at 192.168.0.165:7070>;tag=as66773d49 To: <sip:hellboy at voip.rd.touk.pl:7060>;tag=12711d6c Contact: <sip:0225761853 at 192.168.0.165:7070> Call-ID: 08027b6d45abc7a00c2c6a8630d2de47 at 192.168.0.165 Seq: 102 ACK User-Agent: TouK S.K.A Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Length: 0 --- [Jan 4 10:43:27] -- Now forwarding SIP/213.218.117.72-00837b20 to ' Local/poczta at routing-sip' (thanks to SIP/voip.rd.touk.pl-00843c10) [Jan 4 10:43:27] WARNING[18671]: channel.c:3281 ast_request: No channel type registered for 'Local' [Jan 4 10:43:27] NOTICE[18671]: app_dial.c:505 wait_for_answer: Unable to create local channel for call forward to 'Local/poczta at routing-sip' (cause 66) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080104/21305151/attachment.htm
Benchev
2008-Jan-04 10:50 UTC
[asterisk-users] Unable to forward call on SIP channel after SIP response 302 Moved Temporarily
On Friday 04 January 2008 11:58:25 Tomasz Zieleniewski wrote:> Hi, > > I have the following problem that when asterisk receives SIP response 302 > it cannot forward the call > I get such debug: > [Jan 4 10:43:27] WARNING[18671]: channel.c:3281 ast_request: No channel > type registered for 'Local' > [Jan 4 10:43:27] NOTICE[18671]: app_dial.c:505 wait_for_answer: Unable to > create local channel for call forward to 'Local/poczta at routing-sip' (cause > = 66)Maybe this: "Local channel Description: Local Proxy Channel Driver Syntax: Local/extension at context/n Configuration file: none chan_local is a pseudo-channel. Use of this channel simply loops calls back into the dialplan in a different context. Useful for recursive routing. Notes: Adding "/n" at the end of the string will make the Local channel not do a native transfer (the "n" stands for "n"o release) upon the remote end answering the line. This is an esoteric, but important feature if you expect the Local channel to handle calls _exactly_ like a normal channel. If you do not have the "no release" feature set, then as soon as the destination (inside of the Local channel0 answers the line, the variables and dial plan will revert back to that of the original call, and the Local channel will become a zombie and be removed from the active channels list. This is desirable in some circumstances, but can result in unexpected dialplan behavior if you are doing fancy things with variables in your call handling. " Boyko
Seemingly Similar Threads
- mwi with sip
- Asterisk SIP handling - why 491 Request Pending response
- meetme with ztxen - WARNING[10725]: app_meetme.c:772 build_conf: Unable to open pseudo device
- meetme music on hold - when only conference member problem
- Realtime - mysql query gives wrong results??