asterisk users - Aug 2007 - Asterisk Manager Proxy - Still required?

Hi,

With more recent version of v1.2 and with v1.4 are things like the
AstManProxy still recommended if you want to have a bunch of
applications talking directly to Asterisk?

Cheers!

-- 
Andrew Ruthven, Wellington, New Zealand
At work: andrew.ruthven at catalyst.net.nz
At home: andrew at etc.gen.nz
GPG fpr: 34CA 12A3 C6F8 B156 72C2  D0D7 D286 CE0C 0C62 B791
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070818/8213bf34/attachment.pgp

On 8/17/07, Andrew Ruthven <puck at catalyst.net.nz>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With more recent version of v1.2 and with v1.4 are things like the
> AstManProxy still recommended if you want to have a bunch of
> applications talking directly to Asterisk?
>
 If you're looking to have a number of clients monitor events, etc,
I'd say that having a proxy in between is still a "good thing".
The
performance of the manager itself is greatly improved since before 1.2
but there are still ongoing (albeit random, sporadic) issues with cpu
race and huge memory allocations that still need to get resolved.

-- 
Bird's The Word Technologies, Inc.
http://www.btwtech.com/