I made a post to the list on 8/7 and said that music on hold in Asterisk 1.2 seemed broken. It seemed like the moh class that should be used when party A puts party B on hold, should be the class defined for party A. Asterisk 1.2 does it the other way around and uses party B's moh class. Olle Johannson replied with what's below. I've tested this in Asterisk 1.4, and it's still behaving the same way as it did for Asterisk 1.2. Did this change not make it into 1.4? Doug.> -----Original Message----- > From: Olle E Johansson [mailto:oej@edvina.net] > Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 2:24 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Music On Hold Class Not Makin' Sense > > > The music on hold system was changed by Russell in trunk a few days > ago, since what you > describe is a bug reported long time ago by Terry Wilson. > > In trunk/1.4, when you put someone on hold, the music played is > whatever is configured for the > device that puts someone else on hold. If you want to play > commercial > announcements for > your customers, you do it. > > We had a discussion on AstriDevCon in Pisa about this and > defined the > architecture that > Russell now has implemented. This required some changes to the > internal structure of > the coming Asterisk 1.4 that can't be backported to 1.2, so 1.2 will > remain as it is. > > regards > /Olle > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
Oops I got that a bit mixed up. I meant to say that when party A put party B on hold, the moh class used should be party A's moh. Essentially the moh class used should be what's defined for the person putting the OTHER party on hold. Doug.> -----Original Message----- > From: Douglas Garstang > Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 4:33 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: [asterisk-users] MOH in 1.4 - Still Broken? > > > I made a post to the list on 8/7 and said that music on hold > in Asterisk 1.2 seemed broken. It seemed like the moh class > that should be used when party A puts party B on hold, should > be the class defined for party A. Asterisk 1.2 does it the > other way around and uses party B's moh class. > > Olle Johannson replied with what's below. I've tested this in > Asterisk 1.4, and it's still behaving the same way as it did > for Asterisk 1.2. Did this change not make it into 1.4? > > Doug. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Olle E Johansson [mailto:oej@edvina.net] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 2:24 AM > > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Music On Hold Class Not Makin' Sense > > > > > > The music on hold system was changed by Russell in trunk a > few days > > ago, since what you > > describe is a bug reported long time ago by Terry Wilson. > > > > In trunk/1.4, when you put someone on hold, the music played is > > whatever is configured for the > > device that puts someone else on hold. If you want to play > > commercial > > announcements for > > your customers, you do it. > > > > We had a discussion on AstriDevCon in Pisa about this and > > defined the > > architecture that > > Russell now has implemented. This required some changes to the > > internal structure of > > the coming Asterisk 1.4 that can't be backported to 1.2, so > 1.2 will > > remain as it is. > > > > regards > > /Olle > > _______________________________________________ > > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > > > asterisk-users mailing list > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
Ahh, I assume your talking about mohinterpret and mohsuggest I assume. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Jason Parker [mailto:jparker@digium.com] Sent: Mon 9/25/2006 6:36 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Cc: Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] MOH in 1.4 - Still Broken? ----- Douglas Garstang <dgarstang@oneeighty.com> wrote: > Oops I got that a bit mixed up. I meant to say that when party A put > party B on hold, the moh class used should be party A's moh. > Essentially the moh class used should be what's defined for the person > putting the OTHER party on hold. > > Doug. > Take a look at the new sample configs for (random example) SIP, and look at the new moh options. -- Jason Parker Digium _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users