James Dyer
2006-Sep-19 05:12 UTC
[asterisk-users] Aastra 9133i and Atcom AT-320 - Comments please
I'm planning to deploy an Asterisk system in our office soon, and am thinking of using a mixture of Aastra 9133i and Atcom AT-320 phones. Has anyone got any comments (good or bad) about these phone models? Thanks, James
bails
2006-Sep-19 05:19 UTC
[asterisk-users] Aastra 9133i and Atcom AT-320 - Comments please
I've never used the Aastra but the AT-320's seem to work fairly well, my only bug with them is there lack of weight, they slide across the desk to readily. Bails James Dyer wrote:> I'm planning to deploy an Asterisk system in our office soon, and am > thinking of using a mixture of Aastra 9133i and Atcom AT-320 phones. > > Has anyone got any comments (good or bad) about these phone models? > > Thanks, > > James > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >
Dave Cotton
2006-Sep-19 06:15 UTC
[asterisk-users] Aastra 9133i and Atcom AT-320 - Comments please
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 13:13 +0100, James Dyer wrote:> I'm planning to deploy an Asterisk system in our office soon, and am > thinking of using a mixture of Aastra 9133i and Atcom AT-320 phones. > > Has anyone got any comments (good or bad) about these phone models?I now only use Aastra phones, the 9133i is solid and professional looking and works very well with *. My experience with support is A1. Message waiting is well signalled as is no service. The switch and POE save a lot of cabling. -- Dave Cotton <dcotton@linuxautrement.com>