All, is there anyone who uses g726-32 ? If not, then does anyone know why don't people use it? It's free, and provides the best compromise on quality, bandwidth and cpu load (judging by it's specs and algorithm) and oh did I mention, it's FREE? So why don't people use it? Any ideas? Is it too good to be true or it's not what it sounds like? Oh and since I am only looking at codecs to use between the subscriber and our system (no carriers involved), the popularity and ubiquity of g729 and g711 aren't a qualifying factor for this particular discussion :) Thx \R
RR wrote:> All, > > is there anyone who uses g726-32 ? If not, then does anyone know why > don't people use it?I use g726 on iax links between systems and to teliax.com for LD calls. Have no idea if its -32 or what though. What ships with asterisk (in terms of g726) has been working very well for us with the exception of a period of time where all g726 calls via teliax were not usable. Teliax had to have had a problem or was playing around as that was the only iax link that had bad audio.> Oh and since I am only looking at codecs to use between the subscriber > and our system (no carriers involved), the popularity and ubiquity of > g729 and g711 aren't a qualifying factor for this particular > discussion :)