Has anyone had any success creating a redundant ethernet connection from their Asterisk server? What I would like it to do is use both ethernet controllers on my motherboard so that if one fails the other one takes over. I don't see anyway to make it work seamlessly with 2 IP addresses it would probably have to be a hot standby in software type of thing. Preferrably with Debian Sarge but CentOS 4.3 is an option.
Yes, use the bonding driver. That way you only have one IP address and both connections are viewed as one logical. - Brad -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of shadowym Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 12:45 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Redundant Ethernet Has anyone had any success creating a redundant ethernet connection from their Asterisk server? What I would like it to do is use both ethernet controllers on my motherboard so that if one fails the other one takes over. I don't see anyway to make it work seamlessly with 2 IP addresses it would probably have to be a hot standby in software type of thing. Preferrably with Debian Sarge but CentOS 4.3 is an option. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it.
You can try bonding the interfaces into one: http://www.cyberciti.biz/nixcraft/vivek/blogger/2006/04/linux-bond-or-te am-multiple-network.php We have this in our Asterisk setup but recently got recommended to remove it to combat intermittent issues. -Dan -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of shadowym Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 9:45 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Redundant Ethernet Has anyone had any success creating a redundant ethernet connection from their Asterisk server? What I would like it to do is use both ethernet controllers on my motherboard so that if one fails the other one takes over. I don't see anyway to make it work seamlessly with 2 IP addresses it would probably have to be a hot standby in software type of thing. Preferrably with Debian Sarge but CentOS 4.3 is an option. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
On 7/20/06, shadowym <shadowym@hotmail.com> wrote:> their Asterisk server? What I would like it to do is use both ethernet > controllers on my motherboard so that if one fails the other one takes over. > I don't see anyway to make it work seamlessly with 2 IP addresses it wouldhere are some url's to look into: http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/350 http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/163 cheers
Have a google for 'interface bonding'. You bond your two cards together to appear as a single one and then bind Asterisk to an IP address on it. The cards work in loadbalance or failover mode as you specify. On 7/20/06, shadowym <shadowym@hotmail.com> wrote:> > > Has anyone had any success creating a redundant ethernet connection from > their Asterisk server? What I would like it to do is use both ethernet > controllers on my motherboard so that if one fails the other one takes > over. > I don't see anyway to make it work seamlessly with 2 IP addresses it would > probably have to be a hot standby in software type of thing. > > Preferrably with Debian Sarge but CentOS 4.3 is an option. > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060720/c56373a6/attachment.htm
We're using OSPF...> -----Original Message----- > From: Watkins, Bradley [mailto:Bradley.Watkins@compuware.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 10:50 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Redundant Ethernet > > > Yes, use the bonding driver. That way you only have one IP > address and > both connections are viewed as one logical. > > - Brad > > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of shadowym > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 12:45 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [asterisk-users] Redundant Ethernet > > > Has anyone had any success creating a redundant ethernet > connection from > their Asterisk server? What I would like it to do is use > both ethernet > controllers on my motherboard so that if one fails the other one takes > over. > I don't see anyway to make it work seamlessly with 2 IP addresses it > would probably have to be a hot standby in software type of thing. > > Preferrably with Debian Sarge but CentOS 4.3 is an option. > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named > addressee only. It contains information that may be > confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an > authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose > it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify > us immediately and then destroy it. > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
Mark Ackroyd
2006-Jul-20 10:04 UTC
[asterisk-users] Sending back a ring signal, SIP 180 i think.
Guys,
I am trying to set up a SIP to PSTN gateway, and I have a client sending in
SIP traffic, once on the asterisk machine, I do something like this.
[outbound-sip]
exten => _XXX.,1,NoOP(${CDR(accountcode)})
exten => _XXX.,2,Dial(ZAP/g1/${CDR(accountcode)}${EXTEN})
This works, except that the client wants to bill only when the call is
finally connected on the zap line, and to his SIP equipment he needs to see
a 180 or 183 SIP signal back until the call on the zap line is connected.
I am a bit stuck at this point :-(. Anyone know how I can do this?
Thanks,
Mark
LOL found this: http://fcp.homelinux.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=549 hope it helps... Guido> > We're using OSPF... > > Is That? > > Oh > Shit > PBX > Failed? > > > SNIP > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
In article <93D4BCE34C8C1A4E8D92E1A9E8738D6506AC14C2@EVS2.ad.greenspuncorp.com>, dan.brummer@vegas.com says...> We have this in our Asterisk setup but recently got recommended to > remove it to combat intermittent issues.Can you please explain this? What was the problem? -- Tomislav Par?ina Lama Computers Split Stinice 12, 21000 Split Tel.: +385(21)495148 Mob.: +385(91)1212148 SIP: tomo@pbx.lama.hr e-mail: tparcina#lama.hr http://www.lama.hr