asterisk users - Jul 2006 - Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!

The Asterisk development team is pleased to announce new releases of
Asterisk and Zaptel: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7.

These releases incorporate a number of bug fixes, and the Asterisk
release contains a new option to help avoid a potential denial of
service vulnerability in the IAX2 channel driver. The Zaptel release
also adds support for the TE407P and TE412P quad T1/E1 interface cards.

The release files are available in the usual place (ftp.digium.com), as
both tarballs and patch files relative to the last release. In addition,
both the tarballs and the patch files have been signed using GPG keys of
the release maintainers, so that you can ensure their authenticity.

Thanks for supporting Asterisk and Zaptel!

What is the best way to update from 1.2.9 to 1.2.10?
 
Thanks
 
Julian


> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:14:31 -0500> From: asteriskteam@digium.com>
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk
1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!> > The Asterisk development team is
pleased to announce new releases of> Asterisk and Zaptel: Asterisk 1.2.10 and
Zaptel 1.2.7.> > These releases incorporate a number of bug fixes, and the
Asterisk> release contains a new option to help avoid a potential denial
of> service vulnerability in the IAX2 channel driver. The Zaptel release>
also adds support for the TE407P and TE412P quad T1/E1 interface cards.> >
The release files are available in the usual place (ftp.digium.com), as> both
tarballs and patch files relative to the last release. In addition,> both the
tarballs and the patch files have been signed using GPG keys of> the release
maintainers, so that you can ensure their authenticity.> > Thanks for
supporting Asterisk and Zaptel!> > > >
_______________________________________________> --Bandwidth and Colocation
provided by Easynews.com --> > asterisk-users mailing list> To
UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:>   
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060714/26a8ab66/attachment.htm

So I can just install it over 1.2.9?  This is what I did and everything seems to
be working fine.




----------------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:47:40 +1200
> From: matt.riddell@sineapps.com
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Julian Varanini wrote:
> > What is the best way to update from 1.2.9 to 1.2.10?
> 
> If it was downloaded from SVN then you can just type make update in the
> directory.
> 
> If it was a .tar.gz download then you will need to reinstall.  I would
> recommend using the 1.2 branch of SVN as it means you don't have to
wait
> for the releases to get the bugfixes.
> 
> - --
> Cheers,
> 
> Matt Riddell
> _______________________________________________
> 
> http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
> http://freevoip.gedameurope.com (Free Asterisk Voip Community)
> http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFEuLm8S6d5vy0jeVcRAk9RAJ478UyMx8g7WLzkhAp+9VT9eZfXewCggHXo
> 9bn2Ob7u9jlDsqrKLZVrv/4> =y79J
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

In article <44B8B9BC.9010006@sineapps.com>, matt.riddell@sineapps.com
says...
> If it was a .tar.gz download then you will need to reinstall.  
Hi Matt!

If I upgrade to 1.2.10 and than decide to go back to some prior version, how
will I do that (using tar.gz)?


--
Tomislav Par?ina
Lama Computers Split
Stinice 12, 21000 Split
Tel.: +385(21)495148
Mob.: +385(91)1212148
SIP: tomo@pbx.lama.hr
e-mail: tparcina#lama.hr
http://www.lama.hr

On Jul 16, 2006, at 11:12 PM, Tomislav Par?ina wrote:
> In article <44B8B9BC.9010006@sineapps.com>, matt.riddell@sineapps.com
> says...
>> If it was a .tar.gz download then you will need to reinstall.
>
> Hi Matt!
>
> If I upgrade to 1.2.10 and than decide to go back to some prior 
> version, how will I do that (using tar.gz)?
>
>
I think if you keep the older source in a separate directory,  you can 
always cd back to it and do a make clean, make,  make install.

This is only what I have gleaned from the list,  so hopefully more 
knowledgeable list members will chime in.

This is also the reason I have avoided building from SVN, as I like the 
idea of being able to revert to an earlier working build if need be...


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 812 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060716/219acc16/attachment.bin

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 19:21 +1200, Matt Riddell (NZ) wrote:
>> It will sometimes tell you that there are modules inside
>> /var/lib/asterisk/modules which were not compiled for the version you
>> are compiling.  If these are not asterisk-addons modules you will
likely
>> need to remove them.
> 
> or modules from others that arent allowed to contribute to
> asterisk-addons or the tree itself for whatever reason, of which I have
> a few of those that have been specifically rejected for inclusion even
> though disclaimers are on file :/
> 
> politics at its finest.  At least they work and it appears that some of
> them take less ram and cpu than default asterisk stuffs :)
:)

Which applications exist that have been disclaimed, well coded, are
patent unencumbered and are not accepted?

- --
Cheers,

Matt Riddell
_______________________________________________

http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://freevoip.gedameurope.com (Free Asterisk Voip Community)
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEu9C8S6d5vy0jeVcRAuW9AJ0Z7+RC4+4sN6Sij0PySd9k2n0EmACeKAZx
L5uAsnu61xqG0/tRXEDhuhE=UMqE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 06:02 +1200, Matt Riddell (NZ)
wrote:
> :)
> 
> Which applications exist that have been disclaimed, well coded, are
> patent unencumbered and are not accepted?
res_js for example, which in my experience on a more or less fair
comparison (the javascript dialplan has more error control, better error
checking, and slightly more functionality but other than that it does
the same stuff) uses LESS ram and LESS cpu on the same hardware with the
same asterisk version when compared to extensions.conf dialplan
processing.  

That is just one example of something that could easily be placed in
asterisk-addons, was disclaimed, and wasnt wanted.  It has no patent and
the license for the code it uses is mozilla spidermonkey which depends
on the nspr stuff, both of which are tri-licensed - gpl,lgpl and mpl
(more like BSD).  

There are more examples, but this is one that doesnt break.  


-- 
Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com     Bret McDanel
Belfast IE +44 28 9099 6461    DE +49 801 777 555 3402
Utrecht NL +31 306 553058      US WA +1 360 207 0479
US NY +1 516 687 5200          FreeWorldDialup: 635378
http://www.trxtel.com the VoIP provider that pays you!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060718/6fc49385/attachment.pgp

Can Digium legally sell this?  It is my understanding that if the license of
all parts cannot be legally sold, then there is no way it is going to be
included.

On 7/18/06, trixter aka Bret McDanel <trixter@0xdecafbad.com>
wrote:
>
>
> res_js for example, which in my experience on a more or less fair
> comparison (the javascript dialplan has more error control, better error
> checking, and slightly more functionality but other than that it does
> the same stuff) uses LESS ram and LESS cpu on the same hardware with the
> same asterisk version when compared to extensions.conf dialplan
> processing.
>
> That is just one example of something that could easily be placed in
> asterisk-addons, was disclaimed, and wasnt wanted.  It has no patent and
> the license for the code it uses is mozilla spidermonkey which depends
> on the nspr stuff, both of which are tri-licensed - gpl,lgpl and mpl
> (more like BSD).
>
> There are more examples, but this is one that doesnt break.
>
>
> --
> Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com     Bret McDanel
> Belfast IE +44 28 9099 6461    DE +49 801 777 555 3402
> Utrecht NL +31 306 553058      US WA +1 360 207 0479
> US NY +1 516 687 5200          FreeWorldDialup: 635378
> http://www.trxtel.com the VoIP provider that pays you!
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQBEvMZA+1olxlzQw5cRAl3yAKCs0dBbVtlNk4eOlsQl2lyclURRawCgsMxY
> JuQAKQ1BBi3k+D5upBQZi0Y> =GoUd
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>

-- 
Lacy Moore
Aspendora, Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060718/ad3e5f30/attachment.htm