asterisk@mazone.info
2006-Apr-21 03:28 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] AAH or Fedora an Asterisk by sources
Hello list users, I come to you in order to ask you your best recommendation for a large scale production Server, which Hill be your best recommendation between Asterisk@H and an installation from scratch with Fedora Core 4 and asterisk compiled by sources?? Thanks in advance, have fun! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060421/a0e72f96/attachment.htm
Install from sources. Run only Asterisk on the production machine, no extra processes. If you must have databases, GUI, AGI and ... put those on another machine and call them across the network. Also, I am not sure how much it helps, but eliminate asterisk modules you will not use by using noload= in modules.conf. chmod 444 the files that you do not want to overwrite on the production box (zapata.conf, zaptel.conf, xxx_addtional, ...) If you like A@H, install it on a test machine. Make all of your configs there and then copy the .confs to the production server (I use WinSCP to copy and also keep a set of copies in Source Safe.) Thanks, Steve -----Original Message----- From: asterisk@mazone.info [mailto:asterisk@mazone.info] Sent: Fri 4/21/2006 6:28 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Cc: Subject: [Asterisk-Users] AAH or Fedora an Asterisk by sources Hello list users, I come to you in order to ask you your best recommendation for a large scale production Server, which Hill be your best recommendation between Asterisk@H and an installation from scratch with Fedora Core 4 and asterisk compiled by sources?? Thanks in advance, have fun! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 5226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060421/1cea126f/attachment.bin