Colin Anderson
2005-Dec-21 11:32 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] New To Asterisk/POTS - Hardware Setup Questi on
Um, not trying to be a smartass, but a simple 2 way splitter like the one you get in the dollar store would do the trick nicely. Then you could just plug in a POTS phone and turn the ringer off. Don't think it would suck too much voltage so your FXO card shouldn't notice. hth -----Original Message----- From: john@cusick.ws [mailto:john@cusick.ws] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 11:26 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] New To Asterisk/POTS - Hardware Setup Question Regards to All, I recently setup an Asterisk system (A@H) and it works like a charm so far. It is in a SOHO behind another Linux iptable NAT firewall with no problems. Hopefully this isn't too dumb a question, and its the right place to ask it. The situation is that at this time I have only one incoming PSTN line which I have not yet hooked up (I have a single port FXO wildcard arriving soon for test purposes) which I would like to have available whether the server is available or not. I'm thinking that a Sipura or Grandstream analog adapter with PSTN passthrough is the solution, but I'm not sure, as I'm new to the whole PBX/POTS system. Everything I've seen with passthrough is also a router/gateway. Is that necesary and will it work or is there a better solution? For example, we have regular power outages here at my location lasting anywhere from 1 minute to two hours and if the system is down I would like to still have access to local 911 as well as other local numbers. The obvious thing to do is just unplug one of the phones and plug it directly into the POTS line, but I'm hoping there is a product available that will work with both Asterisk and allow passthrough that will not only transparent, but be less expensive than setting up a UPS system that will hold the server up for an hour or so. A UPS to hold up the adapting device and phone for an extended period would be far cheaper, I think. TIA for any replies. Regards, John C. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
john@cusick.ws
2005-Dec-21 12:05 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] New To Asterisk/POTS - Hardware Setup Questi on
With pen in hand, Colin Anderson succussfully stormed bulwarks which others armed with sword and excommunication have been repulsed, and said ...> Um, not trying to be a smartass, but a simple 2 way splitter like the one > you get in the dollar store would do the trick nicely. Then you could just > plug in a POTS phone and turn the ringer off. Don't think it would suck > too > much voltage so your FXO card shouldn't notice. > > hthGreat! I thought of that too, but not knowing the required voltage/current levels made me hesitate even suggesting it. I think I have a couple of those laying around in the bottom drawers in just about every room in the house. Thanks for a simple answer to what is probably percieved as a "simple" question. :-) John C.> -----Original Message----- > From: john@cusick.ws [mailto:john@cusick.ws] > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 11:26 AM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] New To Asterisk/POTS - Hardware Setup Question > > Regards to All, > > I recently setup an Asterisk system (A@H) and it works like a charm so > far. It is in a SOHO behind another Linux iptable NAT firewall with no > problems. > > Hopefully this isn't too dumb a question, and its the right place to ask > it. > > The situation is that at this time I have only one incoming PSTN line > which I have not yet hooked up (I have a single port FXO wildcard arriving > soon for test purposes) which I would like to have available whether the > server is available or not. > > I'm thinking that a Sipura or Grandstream analog adapter with PSTN > passthrough is the solution, but I'm not sure, as I'm new to the whole > PBX/POTS system. Everything I've seen with passthrough is also a > router/gateway. Is that necesary and will it work or is there a better > solution? > > For example, we have regular power outages here at my location lasting > anywhere from 1 minute to two hours and if the system is down I would like > to still have access to local 911 as well as other local numbers. > > The obvious thing to do is just unplug one of the phones and plug it > directly into the POTS line, but I'm hoping there is a product available > that will work with both Asterisk and allow passthrough that will not only > transparent, but be less expensive than setting up a UPS system that will > hold the server up for an hour or so. A UPS to hold up the adapting device > and phone for an extended period would be far cheaper, I think. > > TIA for any replies. > > Regards, > > John C. > > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
John Millican
2005-Dec-21 12:11 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] New To Asterisk/POTS - Hardware Setup Questi on
see bottom post On Wednesday December 21 2005 1:32 pm, Colin Anderson wrote:> Um, not trying to be a smartass, but a simple 2 way splitter like the one > you get in the dollar store would do the trick nicely. Then you could just > plug in a POTS phone and turn the ringer off. Don't think it would suck too > much voltage so your FXO card shouldn't notice. > > hth > > -----Original Message----- > From: john@cusick.ws [mailto:john@cusick.ws] > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 11:26 AM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] New To Asterisk/POTS - Hardware Setup Question > > Regards to All, > > I recently setup an Asterisk system (A@H) and it works like a charm so > far. It is in a SOHO behind another Linux iptable NAT firewall with no > problems. > > Hopefully this isn't too dumb a question, and its the right place to ask > it. > > The situation is that at this time I have only one incoming PSTN line > which I have not yet hooked up (I have a single port FXO wildcard arriving > soon for test purposes) which I would like to have available whether the > server is available or not. > > I'm thinking that a Sipura or Grandstream analog adapter with PSTN > passthrough is the solution, but I'm not sure, as I'm new to the whole > PBX/POTS system. Everything I've seen with passthrough is also a > router/gateway. Is that necesary and will it work or is there a better > solution? > > For example, we have regular power outages here at my location lasting > anywhere from 1 minute to two hours and if the system is down I would like > to still have access to local 911 as well as other local numbers. > > The obvious thing to do is just unplug one of the phones and plug it > directly into the POTS line, but I'm hoping there is a product available > that will work with both Asterisk and allow passthrough that will not only > transparent, but be less expensive than setting up a UPS system that will > hold the server up for an hour or so. A UPS to hold up the adapting device > and phone for an extended period would be far cheaper, I think. > > TIA for any replies. > > Regards, > > John C.In my opinion the solution of a sipura 3000 would be the better of the 2 options you mention. this will allow you to have a receptionist phone plugged into it that will work at all times so there will not be any confusion about when power is on use this phone, when power is out use that phone. somewhat compensates for panic factor. Now this will depend on number of extensions in the SOHO. If this is the only extension all is good. Remember that without a ups on the * box when the power goes out all calls end rather abruptly and that dirty shut downs can be a very bad thing. John M