I don't see the sip.conf subscribecontext directive specified (on a per user basis) for use with Realtime. Does realtime allow it? What's the field called? Thanks, Doug
Douglas Garstang wrote:> I don't see the sip.conf subscribecontext directive specified (on a per user basis) for use with Realtime. Does realtime allow it? What's the field called?Any option that can be specified for a user/peer/friend in sip.conf can be specified in Realtime using the same option name as the column name.
Thanks.... while we're on the topic of realtime. Can realtime sipusers be shared amongst multiple Asterisk boxes, to share a common location database? I'm sitting here on a Sunday jerking around with it, having problems. I'd like to know before I spend more Sundays doing the same thing if it's even supposed to work or not. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Kevin P. Fleming [mailto:kpfleming@digium.com] Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005 3:37 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime Subscribecontext Douglas Garstang wrote:> I don't see the sip.conf subscribecontext directive specified (on a per user basis) for use with Realtime. Does realtime allow it? What's the field called?Any option that can be specified for a user/peer/friend in sip.conf can be specified in Realtime using the same option name as the column name. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Oh dear. This is not good news. The issues of NAT, call limit handling and registration expiration don't sound quite so bad. I think we can live with those, if we can in fact just get a central location database. Do you have any suggestions or ideas about how this can be implemented with Asterisk? Because, honestly, right now this current limitation is proving to be a real thorn in our side. Doug. -----Original Message----- From: Kevin P. Fleming [mailto:kpfleming@digium.com] Sent: Sun 12/11/2005 3:51 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Cc: Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime Subscribecontext Douglas Garstang wrote: > Thanks.... while we're on the topic of realtime. Can realtime sipusers be shared amongst multiple Asterisk boxes, to share a common location database? I'm sitting here on a Sunday jerking around with it, having problems. I'd like to know before I spend more Sundays doing the same thing if it's even supposed to work or not. Uhhh... you already quoted my previous message on that topic stating that it was not supported at this time. In any given situation, it may or may not work properly, depending on exactly what the servers and clients are doing. Even if the code had been written, there will still be many issues involved in actually implementing it, including (but not limited to) NAT traversal, call limit handling, registration expiration and others. It also mandates that there can be _no_ caching of peer/user information in memory, which currently means there is no 'qualify' or MWI notification possible. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 5250 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20051211/4977fc82/attachment.bin
Actually, you know, I can't STOP it from caching. I have rtcacheusers=no (or whatever it's called. I'm not in front of the system right now) and it's still populating astdb with registration entries. Hmmm. -----Original Message----- From: Kevin P. Fleming [mailto:kpfleming@digium.com] Sent: Sun 12/11/2005 3:51 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Cc: Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime Subscribecontext Douglas Garstang wrote: > Thanks.... while we're on the topic of realtime. Can realtime sipusers be shared amongst multiple Asterisk boxes, to share a common location database? I'm sitting here on a Sunday jerking around with it, having problems. I'd like to know before I spend more Sundays doing the same thing if it's even supposed to work or not. Uhhh... you already quoted my previous message on that topic stating that it was not supported at this time. In any given situation, it may or may not work properly, depending on exactly what the servers and clients are doing. Even if the code had been written, there will still be many issues involved in actually implementing it, including (but not limited to) NAT traversal, call limit handling, registration expiration and others. It also mandates that there can be _no_ caching of peer/user information in memory, which currently means there is no 'qualify' or MWI notification possible. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users