-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, my topology is like that: ISP --[sip]-- Asterisk --[sip]-- CME Cisco -- ip phones ISP services are g711 and g729 enabled. My Asterisk is registered on ISP with two sip UA. Then I've forwarded calls from ISP to ip phones registered on CME Cisco. With g711 all works like a charm, but for audio quality, and bandwidth utilization, I'm trying now to work with g729 between CME and ISP. What about Asterisk? this is a pass-thru example, or maybe I've to pay a g729 license? Thanks for your support Regards Andrea -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDmBioMakHrsrHP9wRAr2+AJkBgIkiBa6R2mayleAdDM8U505b9wCeIdmu 61KS6xIesH47QknyZI04Gy4=STDC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > On Dec 8, 2005, at 3:27 AM, Andrea Riela wrote: > <snip>With g711 all works like a charm, but for audio quality, and > bandwidth utilization, I'm trying now to work with g729 between CME > and ISP. What about Asterisk? this is a pass-thru example, or maybe > I've to pay a g729 license?Yes, you need to buy the codec for $10(us) per channel if you want to be able to translate g729. I purchased the "unsupported" OSX version of the codec and it seems to work great and solved or improved many quality issues I was seeing. Marty