Hello, Would you please share your experience regarding h323 and oh323 in asterisk. I am confused to choose one. Thanks, -- You don't have any choice, you already made it before you came here.
Prely subjective, but I first installed h323 and it worked. Somewhere along the line something happened and it no longer worked. Recompiling it etc seemed to have no effect. I then tried oh323 and it worked first time and has stayed working. I probably did soemthing wrong, but oh323 seems to work for me. Thanks David -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Innocent Evil Sent: 05 December 2005 14:36 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] h323 vs oh323 Hello, Would you please share your experience regarding h323 and oh323 in asterisk. I am confused to choose one. Thanks, -- You don't have any choice, you already made it before you came here._______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Try chan_oh323 and if it is not ok, try chan_h323 Both work well in different situations/equipments. Isamar On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Innocent Evil wrote:> Hello, > > Would you please share your experience regarding h323 and oh323 in asterisk. > I am confused to choose one. > > Thanks, > > > -- > You don't have any choice, you already made it before you came here._______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
I like the chan_ooh323. I like the idea of selfcontained H323 channel that doesn't rely external libraries, often with specific versions that conflict with something else. OOH323 works "right out of box" and since we started using it to interconnect Asterisk to Samsung OfficeServ 500 we had no problems whatsoever. regards -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of isamar@isamarmaia.org Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2005 08:11 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] h323 vs oh323 Try chan_oh323 and if it is not ok, try chan_h323 Both work well in different situations/equipments. Isamar On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Innocent Evil wrote:> Hello, > > Would you please share your experience regarding h323 and oh323 inasterisk.> I am confused to choose one. > > Thanks, > > > -- > You don't have any choice, you already made it before you camehere._______________________________________________> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
No, max we used is 30 channels. But according to voip-info its faster protocol because it offloads media processing to asterisk (which is a better choice I think) and only looks after H323 call setup. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of isamar@isamarmaia.org Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2005 11:28 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] h323 vs oh323 Ok.. how many channels are you using? More than 100? Maybe it can be good only for 10 or 20 simultaneous connections... Isamar On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Boris Bakchiev wrote:> I like the chan_ooh323. > I like the idea of selfcontained H323 channel that doesn't relyexternal> libraries, often with specific versions that conflict with something