hello ___________________________________________________________________________ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger T?l?chargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Yes? harry gaillac wrote:>hello > > > > > > >___________________________________________________________________________ >Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger >T?l?chargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com >_______________________________________________ >Asterisk-Dev mailing list >Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev > >_______________________________________________ >--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- > >Asterisk-Users mailing list >Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >
Hi, All Does any one has successful experience use te410p and spandsp together? Could they work well with all 120 channels receive/send fax at the same time? My practice is that rxfax always get broken fax page. Help!
I have some experience using the TE410p and spandsp. I think my max concurrent rxfax has been about 16 or so on a single E1 on a single cpu 3.0Ghz P4. I expect that it could handle at least 30 concurrent faxes, thereafter I think that the disk controller may start to impact performance. My experience of txfax is that it is very sensitive to system load. When I was testing things I was able to get no more than three concurrent instances of txfax going on a system that was otherwise idle. If I was receiving a fax at all via rxfax then I could reliably have no more than one instance of txfax. Craig ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ma Zhiyong" <mazhiyong@sohu.com> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 9:21 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P and SPANDSP> Hi, All > Does any one has successful experience use te410p and spandsp together? > Could they work well with all 120 channels receive/send fax at the same > time? > > My practice is that rxfax always get broken fax page. > > Help!--------------------------------------------------------------------------------> _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Hi, I also experienced broken page receiving fax on asterisk + spandsp with Digium TE410P. I also tried diff. versions of spandsp and asterisk, still no luck. I had no issues using the same asterisk + spandsp config with TE110P. Any ideas? At 09:21 AM 11/24/2005, you wrote:>Hi, All > Does any one has successful experience use te410p and spandsp together? > Could they work well with all 120 channels receive/send fax at > the same time? > > My practice is that rxfax always get broken fax page. > > Help!
TE405p and spandsp works good. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users