thr3ads.net - asterisk users - [Asterisk-Users] RE: [Asterisk-biz] Asterisk as a VoiceConferenceServer [Nov 2005]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Jonathan k. Creasy

2005-Nov-02 15:38 UTC

[Asterisk-Users] RE: [Asterisk-biz] Asterisk as a VoiceConferenceServer

Any IRQ or duplex problem with your NIC? Any collisions or errors? 

I have had similar results to others here in that conferences with
50-100 users are just fine even on fairly outdated hardware. 

-Jonathan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
> bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of BJ Weschke
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 5:20 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: [Asterisk-biz] Asterisk as a
> VoiceConferenceServer
> 
>  SIP
> 
> On 11/2/05, Tom Hayden <haydenth@msu.edu> wrote:
> > Can I ask what kind of trunking you are using for the calls?
> Zap/SIP/IAX?
> >
> > --
> > Tom
> >
> > On 11/2/05, Cullin J. Wible <cwible@algorim.com> wrote:
> > > We used to run a conference server on a PII 400Mhz with 512MB of
RAM.> We had
> > > 2 separate conference rooms with 15 users each (30 simultaneous)
calls> with
> > > no problem.
> > >
> > > We have since upgraded it to a P4 2.0Ghz with 1GB of RAM (just
because> it
> > > was getting old) and it still works just fine with even higher
call> volumes.
> > >
> > > No degradation of quality either that we can see.
> > >
> > > Cullin
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
> > > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
Kanuri,> Seshu
> > > (Company IT)
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 2:51 PM
> > > To: Iain Barker
> > > Cc: Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] RE: [Asterisk-biz] Asterisk as a Voice
> > > ConferenceServer
> > >
> > > Iain Barker Wrote:
> > > -----------------
> > > >Our experience with over 10 or more participants
> > > >in a single Asterisk conference was that quality
> > > >degraded quite rapidly.
> > >
> > > Is this really true as there were many in this list
> > > who had confirmed that they have used the conference
> > > bridge for a lot more connections than what you have
> > > Suggested as the upper limit.
> > >
> > > Logically the conference bridge should work at the
> > > same capacity as the number of calls Asterisk can
> > > handle in a given configuration.
> > >
> > > Though your solution looks impressive and probably is
> > > the best for upto 30 simultaneous calls, I am more
> > > interested in knowing what it takes for Asterisk to be
> > > able to handle the 100 channels I need to run
> > > Simultaneously.
> > >
> > > Seshu Kanuri
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Iain Barker [mailto:yoshac@hotmail.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 1:41 PM
> > > To: Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT)
> > > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] Asterisk as a Voice Conference Server
> > >
> > > Seshu,
> > >
> > > Our experience with over 10 or more participants in a single
Asterisk> > > conference was that quality degraded quite rapidly.
> > >
> > > The solution was a dedicated hardware bridge for conference
mixing
> > >
> > > http://www.aastra.com/enterpriseip/pro_238.asp
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT) wrote:
> > > >
> > > >I am working on a bid for a New York State requirement where
we
need> to
> > >
> > > >provide access to 100 Simulataneous Investors to get into a
> conference
> > > >with the Pension Funds Officer for discussions.
> > > >
> > > >As you might have guessed it, I am presenting an Asterisk
enabled
> > > >Conference solution.
> > > >
> > > >One of the Bid requirement is to provide three verifiable
references> > > >who have implemented a similar voice conference solution for
more
or> > > >less 100 simultaneous calls, with a possible recording of the
entire> > > call.
> > > >
> > > >If anyone has implemented this on a commercial scale, I am
looking> for
> > > >referrals at this time, and a possible co-operation in
future.
> > > >
> > > >I would appreciate if you can send me your name, contact
Info,
> company
> > > >name and a one para description of the solution and the
name/type
of> > > >client whom/where this solution is running at this time.
> > > >
> > > >A couple of minutes of your time is needed when the guys at
Albany> may
> > > >like to speak to you for a confirmation that Asterisk is real
and
it> > > >can do the 100 people conference, what they are looking for.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > I do thousands of conferences a day using asterisk as the
backend,
> most
> > > are in the 5-50 user range, but many are in the 150+ range. (but,
I> use
> > > app_conference, not app_meetme for them).
> > >
> > > I can give you my contact information off-list if you want it.
> > >
> > > -SteveK
> > > --------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.
> Sender does
> > > not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
> > >
> > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
> > >
> > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Tom
> > _______________________________________________
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
> >
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
> 
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

BJ Weschke

2005-Nov-02 16:22 UTC

head link

[Asterisk-Users] RE: [Asterisk-biz] Asterisk as a VoiceConferenceServer

No. None. We're using 100Mb full-duplex switched ethernet connections.

On 11/2/05, Jonathan k. Creasy <jonathan@bluegrass.net>
wrote:> Any IRQ or duplex problem with your NIC? Any collisions or errors?
>
> I have had similar results to others here in that conferences with
> 50-100 users are just fine even on fairly outdated hardware.
>
> -Jonathan
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
> > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of BJ Weschke
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 5:20 PM
> > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: [Asterisk-biz] Asterisk as a
> > VoiceConferenceServer
> >
> >  SIP
> >
> > On 11/2/05, Tom Hayden <haydenth@msu.edu> wrote:
> > > Can I ask what kind of trunking you are using for the calls?
> > Zap/SIP/IAX?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Tom
> > >
> > > On 11/2/05, Cullin J. Wible <cwible@algorim.com> wrote:
> > > > We used to run a conference server on a PII 400Mhz with
512MB of
> RAM.
> > We had
> > > > 2 separate conference rooms with 15 users each (30
simultaneous)
> calls
> > with
> > > > no problem.
> > > >
> > > > We have since upgraded it to a P4 2.0Ghz with 1GB of RAM
(just
> because
> > it
> > > > was getting old) and it still works just fine with even
higher
> call
> > volumes.
> > > >
> > > > No degradation of quality either that we can see.
> > > >
> > > > Cullin
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
> > > > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf
Of
> Kanuri,
> > Seshu
> > > > (Company IT)
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 2:51 PM
> > > > To: Iain Barker
> > > > Cc: Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > > > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] RE: [Asterisk-biz] Asterisk as a
Voice
> > > > ConferenceServer
> > > >
> > > > Iain Barker Wrote:
> > > > -----------------
> > > > >Our experience with over 10 or more participants
> > > > >in a single Asterisk conference was that quality
> > > > >degraded quite rapidly.
> > > >
> > > > Is this really true as there were many in this list
> > > > who had confirmed that they have used the conference
> > > > bridge for a lot more connections than what you have
> > > > Suggested as the upper limit.
> > > >
> > > > Logically the conference bridge should work at the
> > > > same capacity as the number of calls Asterisk can
> > > > handle in a given configuration.
> > > >
> > > > Though your solution looks impressive and probably is
> > > > the best for upto 30 simultaneous calls, I am more
> > > > interested in knowing what it takes for Asterisk to be
> > > > able to handle the 100 channels I need to run
> > > > Simultaneously.
> > > >
> > > > Seshu Kanuri
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Iain Barker [mailto:yoshac@hotmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 1:41 PM
> > > > To: Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT)
> > > > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] Asterisk as a Voice Conference
Server
> > > >
> > > > Seshu,
> > > >
> > > > Our experience with over 10 or more participants in a single
> Asterisk
> > > > conference was that quality degraded quite rapidly.
> > > >
> > > > The solution was a dedicated hardware bridge for conference
mixing
> > > >
> > > > http://www.aastra.com/enterpriseip/pro_238.asp
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT) wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >I am working on a bid for a New York State requirement
where we
> need
> > to
> > > >
> > > > >provide access to 100 Simulataneous Investors to get
into a
> > conference
> > > > >with the Pension Funds Officer for discussions.
> > > > >
> > > > >As you might have guessed it, I am presenting an
Asterisk enabled
> > > > >Conference solution.
> > > > >
> > > > >One of the Bid requirement is to provide three
verifiable
> references
> > > > >who have implemented a similar voice conference solution
for more
> or
> > > > >less 100 simultaneous calls, with a possible recording
of the
> entire
> > > > call.
> > > > >
> > > > >If anyone has implemented this on a commercial scale, I
am
> looking
> > for
> > > > >referrals at this time, and a possible co-operation in
future.
> > > > >
> > > > >I would appreciate if you can send me your name, contact
Info,
> > company
> > > > >name and a one para description of the solution and the
name/type
> of
> > > > >client whom/where this solution is running at this time.
> > > > >
> > > > >A couple of minutes of your time is needed when the guys
at
> Albany
> > may
> > > > >like to speak to you for a confirmation that Asterisk is
real and
> it
> > > > >can do the 100 people conference, what they are looking
for.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I do thousands of conferences a day using asterisk as the
backend,
> > most
> > > > are in the 5-50 user range, but many are in the 150+ range.
(but,
> I
> > use
> > > > app_conference, not app_meetme for them).
> > > >
> > > > I can give you my contact information off-list if you want
it.
> > > >
> > > > -SteveK
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify
sender.
> > Sender does
> > > > not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is
prohibited.
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
> > > >
> > > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > > >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
> > > >
> > > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > > >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Tom
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
> > >
> > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > >   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
> >
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>

asterisk users - Nov 2005 - RE: [Asterisk-biz] Asterisk as a VoiceConferenceServer

[Asterisk-Users] RE: [Asterisk-biz] Asterisk as a VoiceConferenceServer

[Asterisk-Users] RE: [Asterisk-biz] Asterisk as a VoiceConferenceServer