Mark Hulber
2005-Nov-02 15:02 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Warning -- chan_iax2.c: ast_sched_runq tasks
I've started to see this lately on outgoing IAX calls using CVS Head: -- IAX2/voipjet-out-5 is making progress passing it to SIP/64.26.157.252-094e4058 -- IAX2/voipjet-out-6 is making progress passing it to SIP/64.26.157.252-094e4058 Nov 2 16:56:15 WARNING[22566]: chan_iax2.c:7948 network_thread: chan_iax2: ast_sched_runq ran 2502 scheduled tasks all at once Nov 2 16:56:15 WARNING[22566]: chan_iax2.c:7948 network_thread: chan_iax2: ast_sched_runq ran 3131 scheduled tasks all at once Nov 2 16:56:15 WARNING[22566]: chan_iax2.c:7948 network_thread: chan_iax2: ast_sched_runq ran 3074 scheduled tasks all at once -- IAX2/voipjet-out-6 answered SIP/64.26.157.252-094e4058 Any interpretation? MARK.
Rich Adamson
2005-Nov-02 15:29 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Warning -- chan_iax2.c: ast_sched_runq tasks
> I've started to see this lately on outgoing IAX calls using CVS Head: > > -- IAX2/voipjet-out-5 is making progress passing it to > SIP/64.26.157.252-094e4058 > -- IAX2/voipjet-out-6 is making progress passing it to > SIP/64.26.157.252-094e4058 > Nov 2 16:56:15 WARNING[22566]: chan_iax2.c:7948 network_thread: > chan_iax2: ast_sched_runq ran 2502 scheduled tasks all at once > Nov 2 16:56:15 WARNING[22566]: chan_iax2.c:7948 network_thread: > chan_iax2: ast_sched_runq ran 3131 scheduled tasks all at once > Nov 2 16:56:15 WARNING[22566]: chan_iax2.c:7948 network_thread: > chan_iax2: ast_sched_runq ran 3074 scheduled tasks all at once > -- IAX2/voipjet-out-6 answered SIP/64.26.157.252-094e4058 > > Any interpretation?The above would suggest a _very_ busy box. Any idea how many calls were in progress during this? Some of the folks on the -dev list might be interested in seeing the above numbers, so I'll cross-post my response over there as well. Rich
Mark Hulber
2005-Nov-02 16:12 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Warning -- chan_iax2.c: ast_sched_runq tasks
Ok. It seems my calls are completing ok. MARK. Rich Adamson wrote:> Steve committed the source code changes to cvs-head to display these > numbers, and I believe he was working on jitterbuffer or codec stuff. > He has since posted an item that he wished he would not have done that > as its generating lots of questions. > > His thought process was something along the lines that if too many > tasks are in the secheduler, then servicing the code he was playing > with might not occur in the time frames that one might expect. So he > dumped those lines of code in there to find out. Since there is no > other data, no one knows what those other scheduled tasks might be, > so there's no way to answer the question of 'what's going on'. > > Just ignore the item for now. > > Rich > > ------------------------ > From: Mark Hulber <asterisk-admin@hulber.com> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Warning -- chan_iax2.c: ast_sched_runq tasks > Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 17:50:28 -0500 > To: Rich Adamson <radamson@routers.com> > > >> Not busy at all. Like these were the only calls in progress at the time. >> >> MARK. >> >> Rich Adamson wrote: >>>> I've started to see this lately on outgoing IAX calls using CVS Head: >>>> >>>> -- IAX2/voipjet-out-5 is making progress passing it to >>>> SIP/64.26.157.252-094e4058 >>>> -- IAX2/voipjet-out-6 is making progress passing it to >>>> SIP/64.26.157.252-094e4058 >>>> Nov 2 16:56:15 WARNING[22566]: chan_iax2.c:7948 network_thread: >>>> chan_iax2: ast_sched_runq ran 2502 scheduled tasks all at once >>>> Nov 2 16:56:15 WARNING[22566]: chan_iax2.c:7948 network_thread: >>>> chan_iax2: ast_sched_runq ran 3131 scheduled tasks all at once >>>> Nov 2 16:56:15 WARNING[22566]: chan_iax2.c:7948 network_thread: >>>> chan_iax2: ast_sched_runq ran 3074 scheduled tasks all at once >>>> -- IAX2/voipjet-out-6 answered SIP/64.26.157.252-094e4058 >>>> >>>> Any interpretation? >>> The above would suggest a _very_ busy box. Any idea how many calls >>> were in progress during this? >>> >>> Some of the folks on the -dev list might be interested in seeing >>> the above numbers, so I'll cross-post my response over there as >>> well. >>> >>> Rich >>> >>> > > ---------------End of Original Message----------------- > >