asterisk users - Oct 2005 - Opinions on IAX JitterBuffer in old-school 1 .0.0?

>Does sound like you have the fix - upgrade to a newer Asterisk.
*groan* Yes, it did solve the problem, 100%. I upgraded a single site to
1.0.9 and call quality is perfect. Now, on to the other 29....thank GOD for
SSH.

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Colin Anderson wrote:
> >Does sound like you have the fix - upgrade to a newer Asterisk.
> 
> *groan* Yes, it did solve the problem, 100%. I upgraded a single site to
> 1.0.9 and call quality is perfect. Now, on to the other 29....thank GOD for
> SSH. 
As its such a big job, are you SURE you wouldn't rather move them all the 
CVS-HEAD, which is oh-so-nearly 1.2 beta2 and then 1.2 release...?

Steve

Wasn't that terrible thanks to asterisk-update.sh, just drudgery. As to HEAD
/ 1.2 I'd rather let others be early adopters, thanks. I'm trying to get
business done, not lay awake at night thinking how my dialplan is going to
be broken because of syntax changes or waiting for a box to core dump. I
know, I know, HEAD is way better but I have to be conservative - my users
are still leery about VoIP and they will nit-pick about any little thing
("You mean I have to press OK after I dial? That's stupid" and my
all-time
favorite "I get confused when I have three incoming calls at one, I forget
who's on each line - why can't the phone help me with that, I thought
these
phones were so great")

Straw poll: What's the stupidest complaint you've ever had to chase
down?

-----Original Message-----
From: steve@daviesfam.org [mailto:steve@daviesfam.org]
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 11:26 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Opinions on IAX JitterBuffer in old-school
1 .0.0?




On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Colin Anderson wrote:
> >Does sound like you have the fix - upgrade to a newer Asterisk.
> 
> *groan* Yes, it did solve the problem, 100%. I upgraded a single site to
> 1.0.9 and call quality is perfect. Now, on to the other 29....thank GOD
for
> SSH. 
As its such a big job, are you SURE you wouldn't rather move them all the 
CVS-HEAD, which is oh-so-nearly 1.2 beta2 and then 1.2 release...?

Steve

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Colin Anderson wrote:
> I know, I know, HEAD is way better

Not suggesting you put it on 30 machines without testing.  But it really 
is better you know...

Steve

Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
>On Saturday 29 October 2005 13:57, Paul wrote:
>  
>
>>Find me an affordable color LCD with USB interface and I can use my
>>linksys NSLU2 to give them what they want.
>>    
>>
>
>Does it have to be colour?  What do you define as Affordable?
>  
>
Colour and backlighting are highly desirable. Size is important. 
Remember that such a display is often viewed while engaged in conversation.

I would consider it affordable if the complete system would cost a lot 
less than one based on via mainboards with external svga lcd display.