I'm going to poll the group one more time on this one. I have posted this before and didn't get any takers. Digium advises that I should just do IAX in place of TDMoE but I don't have that luxury. I have a very complex dial plan built around the TDMoE functionality and it would be very difficult/expensive to rewrite it. This has always worked excellent on 2.4 but now that we need to upgrade to 2.6 I'm getting all kinds of headaches. I'm willing to pay a consultant to work this out for me. Please contact me off list if interested.... The following is my original message: "Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c on 2.6.X" I'm seeing this on Kernel 2.6.+ implementations, namely Centos 4.1, FC4 machines while trying to do TDMoE trunks between two machines. 2.4 Kernel operates fine on the same hardware.... I'm compiling zaptel-1.0.9.2 as per instructions in README.Linux26 + README.udev. I've also tried CVS head zaptel. Here are some references where the issue has been reported before but I've yet to find a documented solution; http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-February/091867.html http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5126
I received some postings back, as I was trying to do the same thing. it' is a problem with Kernel 2.6... 2.4 works fine .. this is the summary I got from reading the posts before. I hope that helps... I dont have the ability to go DOWn in kernel to 2.4..> I'm going to poll the group one more time on this one. I have posted > this before and didn't get any takers. > > Digium advises that I should just do IAX in place of TDMoE but I don't > have that luxury. I have a very complex dial plan built around the TDMoE > functionality and it would be very difficult/expensive to rewrite it. > This has always worked excellent on 2.4 but now that we need to upgrade > to 2.6 I'm getting all kinds of headaches. I'm willing to pay a > consultant to work this out for me. Please contact me off list if > interested.... > > The following is my original message: > > "Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c on 2.6.X" > > I'm seeing this on Kernel 2.6.+ implementations, namely Centos 4.1, FC4 > machines while trying to do TDMoE trunks between two machines. > 2.4 Kernel operates fine on the same hardware.... > > I'm compiling zaptel-1.0.9.2 as per instructions in README.Linux26 + > README.udev. I've also tried CVS head zaptel. > > Here are some references where the issue has been reported before but > I've yet to find a documented solution; > > http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-February/091867.html > > http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5126 > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
Hi, I am having the same problem on 2 machines running suse 9.3 kernel 2.6.11.4-20a I was hoping that TDMoE would solve some problem that I am having using IAX2. As IAX2 takes the DTMF outof band the timing of the signal is not quite the same as the original and creates problems for other equipment. Ed Pringle -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of pbx@itsngroup.com Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 10:28 AM To: astgroups@adelphia.net; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDMoE and Badness in Kernel I received some postings back, as I was trying to do the same thing. it' is a problem with Kernel 2.6... 2.4 works fine .. this is the summary I got from reading the posts before. I hope that helps... I dont have the ability to go DOWn in kernel to 2.4..> I'm going to poll the group one more time on this one. I have posted > this before and didn't get any takers. > > Digium advises that I should just do IAX in place of TDMoE but I don't > have that luxury. I have a very complex dial plan built around the TDMoE > functionality and it would be very difficult/expensive to rewrite it. > This has always worked excellent on 2.4 but now that we need to upgrade > to 2.6 I'm getting all kinds of headaches. I'm willing to pay a > consultant to work this out for me. Please contact me off list if > interested.... > > The following is my original message: > > "Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c on 2.6.X" > > I'm seeing this on Kernel 2.6.+ implementations, namely Centos 4.1, FC4 > machines while trying to do TDMoE trunks between two machines. > 2.4 Kernel operates fine on the same hardware.... > > I'm compiling zaptel-1.0.9.2 as per instructions in README.Linux26 + > README.udev. I've also tried CVS head zaptel. > > Here are some references where the issue has been reported before but > I've yet to find a documented solution; > > http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-February/091867.html > > http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5126 > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
2.6.13.4 which digium staff recommended. 2.6.14 both fail
Hello, There is a company that does have a strong interest in seeing TDMoE work well with asterisk and the 2.6 linux kernel tree, Red Fone who has a T1/E1 bridge appliance that works over TDMoE with Asterisk. Maybe you should contact them and see if they have any ideas: http://www.red-fone.com/ MATT--- On 11/3/05, Franz Wu <franz.wu@qleap.com.tw> wrote:> 2.6.13.4 which digium staff recommended. > 2.6.14 > > both fail > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >