Does anyone have any experience of these, I have been offered one and am thinking of adding sticking it onto the back of my Asterisk box and just ignore the WAN port if possible, It would be to stick my exisiting phones onto the asterisk box Sean -- +----------------------------------------------------+ |VOIP: FreeWorldDial 689482 VOIPBuster thecivvie | |GPG Key: http://thecivvie.fastmail.fm/thecivvie.asc | +----------------------------------------------------+ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 2859 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050818/3c083a67/smime.bin
Eric Wieling aka ManxPower
2005-Aug-18 12:02 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] SPA-2100 Analog Telephone Adapter
Sean Rima wrote:> Does anyone have any experience of these, I have been offered one and am > thinking of adding sticking it onto the back of my Asterisk box and just > ignore the WAN port if possible, It would be to stick my exisiting > phones onto the asterisk boxNo, you would ignore the LAN port. When I am at home I use this setup: Phones -> 2100 FXS ports -> 2100 WAN port -> Ethernet Switch -> Asterisk
Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote:> Sean Rima wrote: >> Does anyone have any experience of these, I have been offered one and am >> thinking of adding sticking it onto the back of my Asterisk box and just >> ignore the WAN port if possible, It would be to stick my exisiting >> phones onto the asterisk box > > No, you would ignore the LAN port. When I am at home I use this setup: > > Phones -> 2100 FXS ports -> 2100 WAN port -> Ethernet Switch -> AsteriskExcellent, will get it then Sean -- +----------------------------------------------------+ |VOIP: FreeWorldDial 689482 VOIPBuster thecivvie | |GPG Key: http://thecivvie.fastmail.fm/thecivvie.asc | +----------------------------------------------------+ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 2859 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050818/1a03faad/smime.bin
Sean Rima wrote:> Does anyone have any experience of these, I have been offered one and am > thinking of adding sticking it onto the back of my Asterisk box and just > ignore the WAN port if possible, It would be to stick my exisiting > phones onto the asterisk box > > SeanI just bought 12 of them to link 5 offices PBX systems together. so far in my testing they work extremmly well with asterisk. you will want to modify the dial plan on it otherwise you will get a delay when calling extentions. Dennis
Dennis Gilmore wrote:> Sean Rima wrote: >> Does anyone have any experience of these, I have been offered one and am >> thinking of adding sticking it onto the back of my Asterisk box and just >> ignore the WAN port if possible, It would be to stick my exisiting >> phones onto the asterisk box >> >> Sean > > I just bought 12 of them to link 5 offices PBX systems together. so far > in my testing they work extremmly well with asterisk. you will want to > modify the dial plan on it otherwise you will get a delay when calling > extentions. >Excellent, I am still waiting on the bloke to get back to me or else it is ebay :) Sean -- +----------------------------------------------------+ |VOIP: FreeWorldDial 689482 VOIPBuster thecivvie | |GPG Key: http://thecivvie.fastmail.fm/thecivvie.asc | +----------------------------------------------------+ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 2859 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050819/74535970/smime.bin
Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote:> Sean Rima wrote: >> Does anyone have any experience of these, I have been offered one and am >> thinking of adding sticking it onto the back of my Asterisk box and just >> ignore the WAN port if possible, It would be to stick my exisiting >> phones onto the asterisk box > > No, you would ignore the LAN port. When I am at home I use this setup: > > Phones -> 2100 FXS ports -> 2100 WAN port -> Ethernet Switch -> AsteriskIf I were to get another 2100 would I use the LAN port to connect to it? Sean -- +----------------------------------------------------+ |VOIP: FreeWorldDial 689482 VOIPBuster thecivvie | |GPG Key: http://thecivvie.fastmail.fm/thecivvie.asc | +----------------------------------------------------+ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 2859 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050820/43e03eef/smime.bin
Eric Wieling aka ManxPower
2005-Aug-20 18:53 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] SPA-2100 Analog Telephone Adapter
Sean Rima wrote:> Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote: >> Sean Rima wrote: >>> Does anyone have any experience of these, I have been offered one and am >>> thinking of adding sticking it onto the back of my Asterisk box and just >>> ignore the WAN port if possible, It would be to stick my exisiting >>> phones onto the asterisk box >> >> No, you would ignore the LAN port. When I am at home I use this setup: >> >> Phones -> 2100 FXS ports -> 2100 WAN port -> Ethernet Switch -> Asterisk > > If I were to get another 2100 would I use the LAN port to connect to it?You would only use the LAN port if you wanted the device to provide NAT translation/routing between the LAN port and the WAN port.
Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote:> Sean Rima wrote: >> Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote: >>> Sean Rima wrote: >>>> Does anyone have any experience of these, I have been offered one >>>> and am >>>> thinking of adding sticking it onto the back of my Asterisk box and >>>> just >>>> ignore the WAN port if possible, It would be to stick my exisiting >>>> phones onto the asterisk box >>> >>> No, you would ignore the LAN port. When I am at home I use this setup: >>> >>> Phones -> 2100 FXS ports -> 2100 WAN port -> Ethernet Switch -> Asterisk >> >> If I were to get another 2100 would I use the LAN port to connect to it? > > You would only use the LAN port if you wanted the device to provide NAT > translation/routing between the LAN port and the WAN port. >Ahh ok, will get a bigger switch in time then Sean -- +----------------------------------------------------+ |VOIP: FreeWorldDial 689482 VOIPBuster thecivvie | |GPG Key: http://thecivvie.fastmail.fm/thecivvie.asc | +----------------------------------------------------+ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 2859 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050821/cfddd47b/smime.bin