j_amorim
2005-Jun-21 06:22 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] MFC R2 - Can this problem be solved??????????
Hi, MFC R2 - UniCall implementation. The * is configured to send a 1101 Idle signal: zaptel.conf span=3,1,0,cas,hdb3 # cas=9-23:1101 cas=25-39:1101 But is sending 1001 Idle signal Can anyone send me a tip?????? Jun 20 19:06:56 WARNING[24118]: chan_unicall.c:704 unicall_report: MFC/R2 UniCall/12 1001 -> [1/40000000/Idle /Idle ] Jun 20 19:06:56 WARNING[24118]: chan_unicall.c:704 unicall_report: MFC/R2 UniCall/12 <- 1011 [1/40000000/Idle /Idle ] Jun 20 19:06:56 WARNING[24118]: chan_unicall.c:704 unicall_report: MFC/R2 UniCall/12 R2 prot. err. [1/40000000/Idle /Idle ] cause 32773 Jun 20 19:06:56 WARNING[24118]: chan_unicall.c:704 unicall_report: MFC/R2 UniCall/12 1001 -> [1/40000000/Idle /Idle ] Jun 20 19:06:56 WARNING[24118]: chan_unicall.c:2865 handle_uc_event: Unicall/12 event Protocol failure -- Unicall/12 protocol error. Cause 32773
Steve Underwood
2005-Jun-21 07:33 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] MFC R2 - Can this problem be solved??????????
j_amorim wrote:>Hi, > >MFC R2 - UniCall implementation. > >The * is configured to send a 1101 Idle signal: > >zaptel.conf > > >span=3,1,0,cas,hdb3 ># >cas=9-23:1101 >cas=25-39:1101 >You seem to have configured 1101 as the blocking signal.> >But is sending 1001 Idle signal > >1001 is the usual idle signal.>Can anyone send me a tip?????? > >Jun 20 19:06:56 WARNING[24118]: chan_unicall.c:704 unicall_report: MFC/R2 >UniCall/12 1001 -> [1/40000000/Idle /Idle ] >Jun 20 19:06:56 WARNING[24118]: chan_unicall.c:704 unicall_report: MFC/R2 >UniCall/12 <- 1011 [1/40000000/Idle /Idle ] >Jun 20 19:06:56 WARNING[24118]: chan_unicall.c:704 unicall_report: MFC/R2 >UniCall/12 R2 prot. err. [1/40000000/Idle /Idle ] cause >32773 >Jun 20 19:06:56 WARNING[24118]: chan_unicall.c:704 unicall_report: MFC/R2 >UniCall/12 1001 -> [1/40000000/Idle /Idle ] >Jun 20 19:06:56 WARNING[24118]: chan_unicall.c:2865 handle_uc_event: >Unicall/12 event Protocol failure > -- Unicall/12 protocol error. Cause 32773 > >The far ends seems to be acting like the China or Thailand protocols, but I guess from your email address you are in Brazil. A number of people use my R2 software Brazil, but this is the second time someone has reported this problem this week. Strange. I am currently changing the software to make it more flexible, and tolerate this kind of behaviour. It should be ready in a day or two. Regards, Steve