Hi,
spandsp-0.0.2pre18 works fine for txfax with HT488(version-1.0.1.2),
but rxfax doesn't work. After some FAX sounds, it hangup!
Could someone tell me how to debug?
The following is the * CLI> log
to 192.168.0.161:43222
-- Executing NoOp("SIP/4881-bde9", "") in new stack
-- Executing RxFAX("SIP/4881-bde9",
"/home/zenkato/voip/asterisk/fax/tif/send22.tif") in new stack
Sip read:
ACK sip:4883@192.168.0.3:5070 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.161:43222;branch=z9hG4bK3d3700001a29ffff
From: <sip:4881@192.168.0.3:5070>;tag=bdf000008f360000
To: <sip:4883@192.168.0.3:5070>;tag=as4090e42f
Contact: <sip:4881@192.168.0.161:43222>
Proxy-Authorization: DIGEST username="4881",
realm="asterisk", algorithm=MD5,
uri="sip:4883@192.168.0.3:5070", nonce="05ea8e51",
response="04269c40dad3c4c71a9d53e56ef6c790"
Call-ID: 52b500004eb40000@192.168.0.161
CSeq: 42398 ACK
User-Agent: Grandstream HT488 1.0.1.2
Max-Forwards: 70
Allow: INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY,REFER,OPTIONS,INFO,SUBSCRIBE
Content-Length: 0
12 headers, 0 lines
Sip read:
BYE sip:4883@192.168.0.3:5070 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.161:43222;branch=z9hG4bK746cffff2b140000
From: <sip:4881@192.168.0.3:5070>;tag=bdf000008f360000
To: <sip:4883@192.168.0.3:5070>;tag=as4090e42f
Proxy-Authorization: DIGEST username="4881",
realm="asterisk", algorithm=MD5,
uri="sip:4883@192.168.0.3:5070", nonce="05ea8e51",
response="f18d922cb703582e1f9de0f0e2fd040b"
Call-ID: 52b500004eb40000@192.168.0.161
CSeq: 42399 BYE
User-Agent: Grandstream HT488 1.0.1.2
Max-Forwards: 70
Allow: INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY,REFER,OPTIONS,INFO,SUBSCRIBE
Content-Length: 0
11 headers, 0 lines
Sending to 192.168.0.161 : 43222 (non-NAT)
Transmitting (no NAT):
SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.161:43222;branch=z9hG4bK746cffff2b140000
From: <sip:4881@192.168.0.3:5070>;tag=bdf000008f360000
To: <sip:4883@192.168.0.3:5070>;tag=as4090e42f
Call-ID: 52b500004eb40000@192.168.0.161
CSeq: 42399 BYE
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Contact: <sip:4883@192.168.0.3:5070>
Content-Length: 0
to 192.168.0.161:43222
-- Executing Hangup("SIP/4881-bde9", "") in new stack
== Spawn extension (sip, h, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/4881-bde9'
Destroying call '52b500004eb40000@192.168.0.161'
Regards,
Zen
After I did rxfax(...|debug), I got the followings; ......(snip).......>>> DIS: 80 00 ce f4 80 80 81 80 80 80 18HDLC underflow in state 9 Changed from phase 4 to 3 T4 timeout in state 9 Changed from phase 3 to 4 DIS: Prefer 256 octet blocks Can receive fax Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter and V.29 R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm 2D coding Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: Unlimited Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85 R8x15.4lines/mm Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7 North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm) North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm)>>> DIS: 80 00 ce f4 80 80 81 80 80 80 18HDLC underflow in state 9 Changed from phase 4 to 3 T2 timeout Start receiving document Changed from phase 3 to 4 DIS: Prefer 256 octet blocks Can receive fax Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter and V.29 R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm 2D coding Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: Unlimited Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85 R8x15.4lines/mm Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7 North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm) North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm)>>> DIS: 80 00 ce f4 80 80 81 80 80 80 18......(snip)....... Does HT488 version-1.0.1.2 work OK? Zen
> -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Underwood [mailto:steveu@coppice.org] > Sent: 25 May 2005 15:02 > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] rxfax(spandsp-0.0.2pre18) and HT488 > > What is the page supposed to say? Something like: > > IF YOU TRY TO FAX OVER A VOIP CHANNEL YOU ARE WASTING YOUR > TIME. DON'T > WASTE MINE. > > maybe? Would that win your seal of approval? -) > > Regards, > Steve >My knowledge on this subject is approx zero squared (but I don't let such things hold me back from posting :-P) My understanding is that is exactly the case, so tbh I don't see a problem with having that plastered at the top of your pages. I have seen people claim it works but I gave up trying on my network. I am very happy with my fax to email from zap however, hooray for spandsp :-) alex Information contained in this e-mail and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee only, and may contain confidential information of Ubiquity Software Corporation. All unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this email. Unless otherwise expressly agreed in writing signed by an officer of Ubiquity Software Corporation, nothing in this communication shall be deemed to be legally binding. Thank you.
Magnus wrote: Snip > What do you think of http://www.soft-switch.org/foip.html now? Imho very good primer that explains situation well, raises question in terms of market opportunity for fax service at Asterisk zap pri location, does anyone have experience of linking Asterisk/Zap to RightFax style service?