asterisk runs great on BSD if you follow the sirections, and the card i believe does work On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 00:01 -0400, Daniel Salama wrote:> Anyone know if Digium cards, especifically TE410P, are compatible with > BSD (FreeBSD or NetBSD)? How does * run on BSD? > > Thanks, > Daniel > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- skamp <skamp@arkayinc.com> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050502/e83da447/attachment.pgp
Anyone know if Digium cards, especifically TE410P, are compatible with BSD (FreeBSD or NetBSD)? How does * run on BSD? Thanks, Daniel
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com
2005-May-02 21:19 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] BSD Compatability
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 00:06 -0400, skamp wrote:> asterisk runs great on BSD if you follow the sirections, and the card i > believe does workThat is debateable :) First which bsd? FreeBSD 4.x for example doesnt compile becuase of the zaptel stuff, however 5.x does (from ports anyway). In FBSD 5.x the translation times between codecs is higher than a *slower* linux box (again fbsd 5.x ports vs 1.0.7 stable from the debian sarge repository). The speed difference in cpu was roughly 2x faster for fbsd (without anything running no load to speak of) and translation times were 1.5 longer than the linux box. I was amazed at that becuase I see no reason why the os would matter for that. Maybe its just a display error from the CLI, where values were miscalculated and stored and then when displayed incorrect. -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050502/e2e608cb/attachment.pgp
On 5/2/05, trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com <trixter@0xdecafbad.com> wrote:> On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 00:06 -0400, skamp wrote: > > asterisk runs great on BSD if you follow the sirections, and the card i > > believe does work > > That is debateable :) First which bsd?[snip]> Here is the translation table from a dell poweredge 2650/3.06 mhz > running fbsd 5.4-stable.> g723 gsm ulaw alaw g726 adpcm slin lpc10 g729 speex ilbc > g723 - - - - - - - - - - - > gsm - - 2 2 3 2 1 4 8 23 12 > ulaw - 3 - 1 3 2 1 4 8 23 12 > alaw - 3 1 - 3 2 1 4 8 23 12 > g726 - 4 3 3 - 3 2 5 9 24 13 > adpcm - 3 2 2 3 - 1 4 8 23 12 > slin - 2 1 1 2 1 - 3 7 22 11 > lpc10 - 3 2 2 3 2 1 - 8 23 12 > g729 - 3 2 2 3 2 1 4 - 23 12 > speex - 3 2 2 3 2 1 4 8 - 12 > ilbc - 3 2 2 3 2 1 4 8 23 -Here is the translation table from a home brew P-4 3.6 GHz running fbsd 5.4-stable: Translation times between formats (in milliseconds) Source Format (Rows) Destination Format(Columns) g723 gsm ulaw alaw g726 adpcm slin lpc10 g729 speex ilbc g723 - - - - - - - - - - - gsm - - 2 2 2 2 1 3 - - 13 ulaw - 2 - 1 2 2 1 3 - - 13 alaw - 2 1 - 2 2 1 3 - - 13 g726 - 2 2 2 - 2 1 3 - - 13 adpcm - 2 2 2 2 - 1 3 - - 13 slin - 1 1 1 1 1 - 2 - - 12 lpc10 - 2 2 2 2 2 1 - - - 13 g729 - - - - - - - - - - - speex - - - - - - - - - - - ilbc - 3 3 3 3 3 2 4 - - - Lets see how badly the text formatting get mangled ;) -kim