asterisk users - Apr 2005 - Quadbri & bristuff: can * respond only to 1 MSN and leave 1 number to other ISDN phones ?

Hi,

I have problem with Quadbri and bristuffed Asterisk - I guess this is only 
configuration trick. I'd like Asterisk to respond only to 1 number on BRI 
interface and do nothing on other. Right now, even if I leave out that 
number in incoming context, Asterisk takes out and rejects call as number is 
non existant. I'd like that Asterisk wouldn't respond, so other ISDN
phone
can answer it....

I did this with chan_capi, where you can determin incoming MSNs on which 
Asterisk responds, but wonder how to do that with Zap channels....

Thanks in advance,

regards,

Rob.

Hi,
> I have problem with Quadbri and bristuffed Asterisk - I guess this is only 
> configuration trick. I'd like Asterisk to respond only to 1 number on
BRI
> interface and do nothing on other. Right now, even if I leave out that 
> number in incoming context, Asterisk takes out and rejects call as number
is
> non existant. I'd like that Asterisk wouldn't respond, so other
ISDN phone
I think a ugly trick is to do:

exten => MSN_TO_BE_FREE,1,Wait(1000000)

Matteo

> I have eight MSN at home. Six are handled by Asterisk. The two remaining 
> are handled by an external ISDN "modem" which is connected to my
HylaFax
> on another machine. Asterisk and ISDN "modem" are plugged into
the same
> NT1. That works fine for me...
Works for me too.
We have an old fax machine sitting on the same NT1 as
asterisk. In asterisk I ignored the MNS by setting the line
exten => my_fax_msn,1,wait(30)
-- 
Michiel van Baak
http://lunteren.vanbaak.info
michiel@vanbaak.info
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7E0B9A2D

"Two of the most famous products of Berkeley are LSD and BSD. I don't
think that this is a coincidence."

> >
> >Works for me too.
> >We have an old fax machine sitting on the same NT1 as
> >asterisk. In asterisk I ignored the MNS by setting the line
> >exten => my_fax_msn,1,wait(30)
> > 
> >
> Doesn't it work without the wait() in .nl? I just didn't mention
the fax
> MSNs in my incoming context...
> 
I tried, but my default context only has a line:
exten => s,1,Congestion
I did that to prevent usage from outside, since my asterisk
box is open for outside sip phones. My folks connect to it
etc. So without the wait, the incoming call will search for
an exten=> line in the incoming context, won't find one so
falls back to default,s,1
That way faxes wont arrive on my fax machine cause asterisk
is playing the congestion tone.
-- 
Michiel van Baak
http://lunteren.vanbaak.info
michiel@vanbaak.info
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7E0B9A2D

"Two of the most famous products of Berkeley are LSD and BSD. I don't
think that this is a coincidence."

On 20:47, Sat 23 Apr 05, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
> Besides chan_capi does not understand Busy() and Congestion(), that 
> probably is a matter of how fast the faxmodem picks up the call and to 
> what value your timeout is set.
> However, I think, I have another strategy regarding security... I have 
> separate contexts for incoming calls, and each outgoing line... I also 
> have separate contexts for phones, one for "fully trusted" and
one for
> remote clients.
> 
<snip>
> [default]
> exten => s,1,Hangup
> 
> I also have
> 
> exten => i,1,Goto(playrejectmessageandhangup,s,1)
> exten =>ti,1,Goto(playrejectmessageandhangup,s,1)
> 
> at the end of each incoming context, so it's rather unlikely that 
> somebody ever even enters the default context...
> 
</snip>

Sounds like a setup better then mine.
The wait always looked evil to me ;)
Maybe I should set the faxmachine to pickup right away
instead of ringing twice before picking up.
The fax also has a phone in it, that's prolly why it is set
to ring twice now. I took over admin here, so not my call to
start with.
Thanks for the clear setup information :)
-- 
Michiel van Baak
http://lunteren.vanbaak.info
michiel@vanbaak.info
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7E0B9A2D

"Two of the most famous products of Berkeley are LSD and BSD. I don't
think that this is a coincidence."