I just got a linode account and got * up and running without any problems. I was going to ask them to load zaptel/ztdummy, but I was wondering if anyone else was interested in an * friendly UML hosting provider? I might have more luck with getting them to load the kernel mods if there was more than just me interested in it. I almost hate to ask them to do this just for me anyways. Also, any dangers/performance issues from an isp point of view for running ztdummy? Chris
snacktime wrote:> I just got a linode account and got * up and running without any > problems. I was going to ask them to load zaptel/ztdummy, but I was > wondering if anyone else was interested in an * friendly UML hosting > provider? I might have more luck with getting them to load the kernel > mods if there was more than just me interested in it. I almost hate > to ask them to do this just for me anyways. > > > Also, any dangers/performance issues from an isp point of view for > running ztdummy? > > > ChrisI'm setting Xen up right now: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/ also see http://www.unixshell.com I'll let everyone know how it goes. -- Kristian Kielhofner
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:04:03PM -0700, snacktime wrote:> I just got a linode account and got * up and running without any > problems. I was going to ask them to load zaptel/ztdummy, but I was > wondering if anyone else was interested in an * friendly UML hosting > provider? I might have more luck with getting them to load the kernel > mods if there was more than just me interested in it. I almost hate > to ask them to do this just for me anyways. > > > Also, any dangers/performance issues from an isp point of view for > running ztdummy?Chris, Hi! I work for Linode, welcome aboard. ztdummy isn't likely in our UML Kernels and stock ztdummy doesn't work under xen in a user domain though I'm currently looking at some alternative solutions for timing sources. Feel free to pop by the Linode IRC channel to say hello. We should be starting a public beta of xen in about a week and currently have a private beta going on. Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050405/c716e8aa/attachment.pgp
This may be a stupid quesion but why do you need ztdummy? If it's for timing I thought that ztdummy is no longer required? Regards Cameron ----- Original Message ----- From: "snacktime" <snacktime@gmail.com> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 5:04 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk on UML>I just got a linode account and got * up and running without any > problems. I was going to ask them to load zaptel/ztdummy, but I was > wondering if anyone else was interested in an * friendly UML hosting > provider? I might have more luck with getting them to load the kernel > mods if there was more than just me interested in it. I almost hate > to ask them to do this just for me anyways. > > > Also, any dangers/performance issues from an isp point of view for > running ztdummy? > > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >
Anyone tried this on Virtuozzo? /Danny On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 22:04 -0700, snacktime wrote:> I just got a linode account and got * up and running without any > problems. I was going to ask them to load zaptel/ztdummy, but I was > wondering if anyone else was interested in an * friendly UML hosting > provider? I might have more luck with getting them to load the kernel > mods if there was more than just me interested in it. I almost hate > to ask them to do this just for me anyways. > > > Also, any dangers/performance issues from an isp point of view for > running ztdummy? > > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
On 2005-04-06, Antoine Delaporte <adlp@adlp.org> wrote:>>Also, any dangers/performance issues from an isp point of view for >>running ztdummy? > Few month ago I've run my Asterisk, under an UML. > > I was very disapointed, my Sipura3k don't stay registred much more than > 12 hours....I'm not really surprised, given what UML does. You (and some of the others using UML or XEN) ought to try VServer: http://www.linux-vserver.org/. It should give you native access to the device. We have had good luck with it for a wide range of activities, and if you've got a Linux host and want Linux virtual machines, it is probably the best way to go. -- John