>Why do people want to develop more softphones? There's already lots ofsoftphone projects out there >that could use a hand, if you want to work on one. Starting from scratch will just add one more half >baked softphone to the growing list of unuseful Open Source applications.>Especially since you consider using an ActiveX control :)Actually, I have an application for a IAX ActiveX control myself. Rather use IAX because of the whole NAT-traversal issue. I found this: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2002-August/003766.html But little else, and I can't find the source. Anyone else found this, or is the original author of the linked post on this list?
Colin Anderson wrote:>Actually, I have an application for a IAX ActiveX control myself. Rather use >IAX because of the whole NAT-traversal issue. I found this: > >http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2002-August/003766.html > >But little else, and I can't find the source. Anyone else found this, or is >the original author of the linked post on this list? > >I would recommend looking at the iaxclient lib. Somebody also made an OCX control for it. The code doesn't look very mature, but it worked great for my testing and it doesn't suffer from the silence suppression issues that SIP controls may have. iaxclient: http://iaxclient.sourceforge.net/ ocx: http://www.geocities.com/babarnazmi/index2.htm Tim Greiser -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.6 - Release Date: 2/7/2005