Carmi Weinzweig
2004-Sep-14 07:48 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Comparisons between * and sipXpbx (PingTel's open source product)
Has anyone compared * to sipXpbx? From a cursory look, this open source version of PingTel's PBX has many features that make it more suitable as a replacement for a traditional PBX, including the ability for users to tell if a phone/trunk is in use. What I am trying to figure out is what I'd give up using sipX instead of * (and vice versa). /carmi
Steven P. Donegan
2004-Sep-14 08:36 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Comparisons between * and sipXpbx (PingTel's open source product)
Carmi Weinzweig wrote:> Has anyone compared * to sipXpbx? From a cursory look, this open > source version of PingTel's PBX has many features that make it more > suitable as a replacement for a traditional PBX, including the ability > for users to tell if a phone/trunk is in use. What I am trying to > figure out is what I'd give up using sipX instead of * (and vice versa). > > /carmi > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >Well, the first thing you'd be giving up is this - Asterisk compiles/runs/works. The open source version of Pingtel's code does none of these things...